- Jun 07, 2018
-
-
Marcus Huewe authored
If the remove_session_cb accesses the session's data (for instance, via SSL_SESSION_get_protocol_version), a potential use after free can occur. For this, consider the following scenario when adding a new session via SSL_CTX_add_session: - The session cache is full (SSL_CTX_sess_number(ctx) > SSL_CTX_sess_get_cache_size(ctx)) - Only the session cache has a reference to ctx->session_cache_tail (that is, ctx->session_cache_tail->references == 1) Since the cache is full, remove_session_lock is called to remove ctx->session_cache_tail from the cache. That is, it SSL_SESSION_free()s the session, which free()s the data. Afterwards, the free()d session is passed to the remove_session_cb. If the callback accesses the session's data, we have a use after free. The free before calling the callback behavior was introduced in commit e4612d02 ("Remove sessions from external cache, even if internal cache not used."). CLA: trivial Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6222)
-
Richard Levitte authored
After some discussion, it was concluded that the better idea is to stipulate that the pass phrases passed to the OSSL_STORE API are expected to be UTF-8 encoded, and that all objects made accessible through OSSL_STORE URIs should adhere to this expectation (at the discretion of the loaders). Email ref: https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-project/2018-June/000771.html Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6416)
-
Matt Caswell authored
Improves readability Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6415)
-
Matt Caswell authored
We generate the secrets based on the nonce immediately so there is no need to keep the nonce. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6415)
-
Matt Caswell authored
All tickets on a connection need to have a unique nonce. When this was originally implemented we only ever sent one ticket on the conneciton so this didn't matter. We were just using the value 0. Now we can get multiple tickets to we need to start doing the ticket nonce properly. Fixes #6387 Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6415)
-
Matt Caswell authored
Commit 61fb5923 broke EAP-FAST support. This fixes it. Fixes #6395 Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6428)
-
Matt Caswell authored
Broken by 0336df2f . Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6427)
-
- Jun 06, 2018
-
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6419)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6419)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6419)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6419)
-
- Jun 05, 2018
-
-
Georg Schmidt authored
Issue a warning when generating DSA or RSA keys of size greater than OPENSSL_DSA_MAX_MODULUS_BITS resp. OPENSSL_RSA_MAX_MODULUS_BITS. Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6380)
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6413)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Needed for the platforms that don't define UINT16_MAX. Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6414)
-
- Jun 04, 2018
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
There were a large number of error codes that were unused (probably a copy&paste from somewhere else). Since these have never been made public we should remove then and rebuild the error codes. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6386)
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6386)
-
Matt Caswell authored
These were never made public so can just be deleted. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6386)
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6386)
-
Matt Caswell authored
Also general clean up of those tests Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6386)
-
Matt Caswell authored
Also does some reformatting to tidy things up Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6386)
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6386)
-
Jack Lloyd authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6386)
-
Jack Lloyd authored
Address issue #5670 Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6386)
-
- Jun 03, 2018
-
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Biggest part, ~7%, of improvement resulted from omitting constants' table index increment in each round. And minor part from rescheduling instructions. Apparently POWER9 (and POWER8) manage to dispatch instructions more efficiently if they are laid down as if they have no latency... Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6406)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
This comes at cost of minor 2.5% regression on G4, which is reasonable trade-off. [Further improve compliance with ABI requirements.] Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6406)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
As it turns out originally published results were skewed by "turbo" mode. VM apparently remains oblivious to dynamic frequency scaling, and reports that processor operates at "base" frequency at all times. While actual frequency gets increased under load. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6406)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
OPENSSL_memcmp is a must in GCM decrypt and general-purpose loop takes quite a portion of execution time for short inputs, more than GHASH for few-byte inputs according to profiler. Special 16-byte case takes it off top five list in profiler output. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6312)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
On contemporary platforms assembly GHASH processes multiple blocks faster than one by one. For TLS payloads shorter than 16 bytes, e.g. alerts, it's possible to reduce hashing operation to single call. And for block lengths not divisible by 16 - fold two final calls to one. Improvement is most noticeable with "reptoline", because call to assembly GHASH is indirect. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6312)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Even though calls can be viewed as styling improvement, they do come with cost. It's not big cost and shows only on short inputs, but it is measurable, 2-3% on some platforms. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6312)
-
Kurt Roeckx authored
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> GH: #6405
-
Kurt Roeckx authored
Only Linux and FreeBSD provide getrandom(), but they both also provide getentropy() since the same version and we already tried to call that. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> GH: #6405
-
Kurt Roeckx authored
This will actually support most OSs, and at least adds support for Solaris and OSX Fixes: #6403 Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> GH: #6405
-
Kurt Roeckx authored
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> GH: #6405
-
- Jun 02, 2018
-
-
Ken Goldman authored
ECDSA_SIG_new() returns NULL on error. Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6398)
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6404)
-
- Jun 01, 2018
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
This includes a quick recommendation on how to name loader docmentation. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6350)
-
- May 31, 2018
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Just because an engine implements algorithm methods, that doesn't mean it also implements the ASN1 method. Therefore, be careful when looking for an ASN1 method among all engines, don't try to use one that doesn't exist. Fixes #6381 Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6383) (cherry picked from commit 1ac3cd6277f880fac4df313702d5e3b3814e56e2) (cherry picked from commit 13b578ada3106a4ce9b836f167ee520539f5fa8f)
-
Matt Caswell authored
This is probably a "should not happen" scenario, but better check anyway. Found by Coverity. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6373)
-
Matt Caswell authored
Found by Coverity Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6373)
-
Matt Caswell authored
Fix a memory leak in storeutl. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6373)
-