- Nov 23, 2018
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by:
Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7692) (cherry picked from commit 8d9535ec)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Since recently, OpenSSL tarballs are produced with 'make tar' rather than 'make dist', as the latter has turned out to be more troublesome than useful. The next step to look at is why we would need to configure at all to produce a Makefile just to produce a tarball. After all, the tarball should now only contain source files that are present even without configuring. Furthermore, the current method for producing tarballs is a bit complex, and can be greatly simplified with the right tools. Since we have everything versioned with git, we might as well use the tool that comes with it. Added: util/mktar.sh, a simple script to produce OpenSSL tarballs. It takes the options --name to modify the prefix of the distribution, and --tarfile tp modify the tarball file name specifically. This also adds a few entries in .gitattributes to specify files that should never end up in a distribution tarball. Reviewed-by:
-
- Nov 20, 2018
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by:Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: -
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by:
Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7666)
-
- Nov 13, 2018
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by:
Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7633) (cherry picked from commit 2dc37bc2)
-
Richard Levitte authored
We therefore must add defaults. Reviewed-by:
Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7631)
-
Richard Levitte authored
When libssl and libcrypto are compiled on Linux with "-rpath", but not "--enable-new-dtags", the RPATH takes precedence over LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and we end up running with the wrong libraries. This is resolved by using full (or at least relative, rather than just the filename to be found on LD_LIBRARY_PATH) paths to the shared objects. Reviewed-by:
-
Richard Levitte authored
Fixes #7634 Reviewed-by:
-
Richard Levitte authored
We made the build of foo.obj depend on foo.d, meaning the latter gets built first. Unfortunately, the way the compiler works, we are forced to redirect all output to foo.d, meaning that if the source contains an error, the build fails without showing those errors. We therefore remove the dependency and force the build of foo.d to always happen after build of foo.obj. Reviewed-by:
Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7533)
-
- Nov 10, 2018
-
-
Billy Brumley authored
Reviewed-by:
-
- Nov 09, 2018
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
A couple of $(ECHO) sneaked in from patches in newer branches Fixes #7600 Reviewed-by:
-
Richard Levitte authored
... otherwise, it's taken to be part of a device name. Reviewed-by:
-
Richard Levitte authored
We only had the main 'install' target depend on 'all'. This changes the dependencies so targets like install_dev, install_runtime_libs, install_engines and install_programs depend on build targets that are correspond to them more specifically. This increases the parallel possibilities. Fixes #7466 Reviewed-by:
Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7583) (cherry picked from commit e8d01a60)
-
Richard Levitte authored
When trying 'make -j{n} install', you may occasionally run into trouble because to sub-targets (install_dev and install_runtime) try to install the same shared libraries. That makes parallel install difficult. This is solved by dividing install_runtime into two parts, one for libraries and one for programs, and have install_dev depend on install_runtime_libs instead of installing the shared runtime libraries itself. Fixes #7466 Reviewed-by:
-
- Nov 01, 2018
-
-
Pauli authored
Reviewed-by:
-
- Oct 30, 2018
-
-
Rod Vagg authored
Commit 56fb454d backported the DSA reallocation fix to 1.1.0, however a code block that has multiple statements in 1.1.1+ only has a `goto` in 1.1.0 so introduces a brace that causes a compile failure. CLA:trivial Reviewed-by:
-
- Oct 28, 2018
-
-
Pauli authored
Preallocate an extra limb for some of the big numbers to avoid a reallocation that can potentially provide a side channel. Reviewed-by:
Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7486) (cherry picked from commit 99540ec7)
-
Pauli authored
Avoid a timing attack that leaks information via a side channel that triggers when a BN is resized. Increasing the size of the BNs prior to doing anything with them suppresses the attack. Thanks due to Samuel Weiser for finding and locating this. Reviewed-by:
-
Pauli authored
There is a side channel attack against the division used to calculate one of the modulo inverses in the DSA algorithm. This change takes advantage of the primality of the modulo and Fermat's little theorem to calculate the inverse without leaking information. Thanks to Samuel Weiser for finding and reporting this. Reviewed-by:
-
- Oct 22, 2018
-
-
Dr. Matthias St. Pierre authored
Previously, the RNG sets `initialized=1` after the first call to RAND_poll(), although its criterion for being initialized actually is whether condition `entropy >= ENTROPY_NEEDED` is true. This commit now assigns `initialized=(entropy >= ENTROPY_NEEDED)`, which has the effect that on the next call, RAND_poll() will be called again, if it previously failed to obtain enough entropy. Reviewed-by:
-
- Oct 19, 2018
-
-
Andy Polyakov authored
{make|swap|get|set}context are removed in POSIX.1-2008, but glibc apparently keeps providing it. Reviewed-by:
-
- Oct 18, 2018
-
-
Viktor Dukhovni authored
Also, some readers of the code find starting the count at 1 for EE cert confusing (since RFC5280 counts only non-self-issued intermediate CAs, but we also counted the leaf). Therefore, never count the EE cert, and adjust the path length comparison accordinly. This may be more clear to the reader. Reviewed-by:
-
Viktor Dukhovni authored
At the bottom of https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#page-12 and top of https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#page-13 (last paragraph of above https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-3.3), we see: This specification covers two classes of certificates: CA certificates and end entity certificates. CA certificates may be further divided into three classes: cross-certificates, self-issued certificates, and self-signed certificates. Cross-certificates are CA certificates in which the issuer and subject are different entities. Cross-certificates describe a trust relationship between the two CAs. Self-issued certificates are CA certificates in which the issuer and subject are the same entity. Self-issued certificates are generated to support changes in policy or operations. Self- signed certificates are self-issued certificates where the digital signature may be verified by the public key bound into the certificate. Self-signed certificates are used to convey a public key for use to begin certification paths. End entity certificates are issued to subjects that are not authorized to issue certificates. that the term "self-issued" is only applicable to CAs, not end-entity certificates. In https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-4.2.1.9 the description of path length constraints says: The pathLenConstraint field is meaningful only if the cA boolean is asserted and the key usage extension, if present, asserts the keyCertSign bit (Section 4.2.1.3). In this case, it gives the maximum number of non-self-issued intermediate certificates that may follow this certificate in a valid certification path. (Note: The last certificate in the certification path is not an intermediate certificate, and is not included in this limit. Usually, the last certificate is an end entity certificate, but it can be a CA certificate.) This makes it clear that exclusion of self-issued certificates from the path length count applies only to some *intermediate* CA certificates. A leaf certificate whether it has identical issuer and subject or whether it is a CA or not is never part of the intermediate certificate count. The handling of all leaf certificates must be the same, in the case of our code to post-increment the path count by 1, so that we ultimately reach a non-self-issued intermediate it will be the first one (not zeroth) in the chain of intermediates. Reviewed-by:
-
- Oct 17, 2018
-
-
Andy Polyakov authored
(back-port of commit 7d0effea ) Reviewed-by:
-
- Oct 15, 2018
-
-
Benjamin Kaduk authored
Historically (i.e., OpenSSL 1.0.x), the openssl applications would allow for empty subject attributes to be passed via the -subj argument, e.g., `opensl req -subj '/CN=joe/O=/OU=local' ...`. Commit db4c08f0 applied a badly needed rewrite to the parse_name() helper function that parses these strings, but in the process dropped a check that would skip attributes with no associated value. As a result, such strings are now treated as hard errors and the operation fails. Restore the check to skip empty attribute values and restore the historical behavior. Document the behavior for empty subject attribute values in the corresponding applications' manual pages. (cherry picked from commit 3d362f19) (cherry picked from commit a7ee1ef6 ) Reviewed-by:
-
- Oct 13, 2018
-
-
Tomas Mraz authored
Reviewed-by:
-
- Oct 12, 2018
-
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by:
-
- Oct 04, 2018
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Only a few clashing ones remain Reviewed-by:
Paul Yang <yang.yang@baishancloud.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7331) (cherry picked from commit b44882a0)
-
Richard Levitte authored
BIO_s_log() is declared for everyone, so should return NULL when not actually implemented. Also, it had explicit platform limitations in util/mkdef.pl that didn't correspond to what was actually in code. While at it, a few other hard coded things that have lost their relevance were removed. include/openssl/ocsp.h had a few duplicate declarations. Reviewed-by:
-
- Oct 02, 2018
-
-
Sohaib ul Hassan authored
This commit implements coordinate blinding, i.e., it randomizes the representative of an elliptic curve point in its equivalence class, for prime curves implemented through EC_GFp_simple_method, EC_GFp_mont_method, and EC_GFp_nist_method. This commit is derived from the patch https://marc.info/?l=openssl-dev&m=131194808413635 by Billy Brumley. Coordinate blinding is a generally useful side-channel countermeasure and is (mostly) free. The function itself takes a few field multiplicationss, but is usually only necessary at the beginning of a scalar multiplication (as implemented in the patch). When used this way, it makes the values that variables take (i.e., field elements in an algorithm state) unpredictable. For instance, this mitigates chosen EC point side-channel attacks for settings such as ECDH and EC private key decryption, for the aforementioned curves. For EC_METHODs using different coordinate representations this commit does nothing, but the corresponding coordinate blinding function can be easily added in the future to extend these changes to such curves. Co-authored-by:
Billy Brumley <bbrumley@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6526)
-
- Sep 29, 2018
-
-
Billy Brumley authored
This is a backport of #7028 to 1.1.0. It squashes the two original commits and applies changes for compatibility with 1.1.0. 1. cherry picked from commit 30c41bfb [test] ECC: make sure negative tests pass for the right reasons 2. cherry picked from commit bfb10b97 [test] throw error from wrapper function instead of an EC_METHOD specific one Given that in 1.1.0 `EC_POINT_get_affine_coordinates_GFp` and `EC_POINT_get_affine_coordinates_GF2m` have not been unified, in this backport the tests distinguish between the 2 different functions as the cause of the expected error. [extended tests] to trigger sanitizer checks and coverage analysis. Reviewed-by:
-
Billy Brumley authored
This is a backport of #6608 to 1.1.0. 1. For every named curve, two "golden" keypair positive tests. 2. Also two "golden" stock ECDH positive tests. 3. For named curves with non-trivial cofactors, additionally two "golden" ECC CDH positive tests. 4. For named curves with non-trivial cofactors, additionally two negative tests. There is some overlap with existing EVP tests, especially for the NIST curves (for example, positive testing ECC CDH KATs for NIST curves). "Golden" here means all the values are independent from OpenSSL's ECC code. I used sage to calculate them. What comes from OpenSSL is: 1. The OIDs (parsed by tooling) 2. The curve parameters (parsing ecparam output with tooling) The values inside the PEMs (private keys, public keys) and shared keys are from sage. The PEMs themselves are the output of asn1parse, with input taken from sage. (cherry picked from commit 249330de ) Reviewed-by:
-
Nicola Tuveri authored
This is a manual backport of #3472 to 1.1.0. This is a partial backport, limited only to evptests, as #3472 also affected bntests, which has a completely different form in 1.1.0. Reviewed-by:
-
Nicola Tuveri authored
This is a manual port of #3443 (and the related bugfix PR #3452) to 1.1.0. Reviewed-by:
-
- Sep 24, 2018
-
-
Daniel Bevenius authored
This commit documents the OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT which is currently missing in the man page. Reviewed-by:
-
Pauli authored
Change all calls to getenv() inside libcrypto to use a new wrapper function that use secure_getenv() if available and an issetugid then getenv if not. CPU processor override flags are unchanged. Extra checks for OPENSSL_issetugid() have been removed in favour of the safe getenv. Reviewed-by:
-
- Sep 21, 2018
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
This module includes bn.h via other headers, so it picks up the definition from there and doesn't need to define them locally (any more?). Worst case scenario, the redefinition may be different and cause all sorts of compile errors. Fixes #7227 Reviewed-by:
-
- Sep 20, 2018
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
These both indicate that the file descriptor we're trying to use as a terminal isn't, in fact, a terminal. Fixes #7271 Reviewed-by:
-
