- 22 May, 2017 13 commits
-
-
Pauli authored
Don't highlight excess when comparing unequal length strings. Clean up the NULL / empty string display. Reviewed-by:
Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> Reviewed-by:
Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3514)
-
Pauli authored
Excess bytes, when one block is longer than the other, are not explicitly highlighted. The NULL / zero length block output has been cleaned up. Reviewed-by:
-
Alex Gaynor authored
Reviewed-by:
Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by:
-
Alex Gaynor authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Alex Gaynor authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Alex Gaynor authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Alex Gaynor authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Alex Gaynor authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Alex Gaynor authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Pauli authored
Modify one of the integration builds so that that the OPENSSL_SMALL_MEMORY option is compiled. There doesn't appear to be an automatic build with this option set. I think the options in the modified build are covered elsewhere (without the small memory) but a new job might still be preferable. Reviewed-by:
-
Todd Short authored
Fix the small arena test to just check for the symptom of the infinite loop (i.e. initialized set on failure), rather than the actual infinite loop. This avoids some valgrind errors. Reviewed-by:
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: -
Diego Santa Cruz authored
The password_callback() function does not necessarily NULL terminate the password buffer, the caller must use the returned length but the srp app uses this function as if it was doing NULL termination. This made the -passin and -passout options of "openssl srp" fail inexpicably and randomly or even crash. Fixed by enlarging the buffer by one, so that the maximum password length remains unchanged, and adding NULL termination upon return. [Rearrange code for coding style compliance in process.] Reviewed-by:
-
- 21 May, 2017 4 commits
-
-
Rich Salz authored
update pkcs12, smime, ts apps. Reviewed-by:
Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3507)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Switch to TAP::Harness inadvertently masked test failures. Test::Harness::runtests was terminating with non-zero exit code in case of failure[s], while TAP::Harness apparently holds caller responsible for doing so. Reviewed-by: -
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Todd Short authored
Remove assertion when mmap() fails. Only run the 1<<31 limit test on Linux Reviewed-by:
Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by:
-
- 20 May, 2017 5 commits
-
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by:
-
- 19 May, 2017 9 commits
-
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Import test data from sha1test.c, sha256t.c and sha512t.c which is from RFC6234 section 8.5 Reviewed-by:
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Allow multiple "Input" lines to call the update function multiple times. Add "Ncopy" keyword to copy the input buffer. So for example: Input = "a" Ncopy = 1024 Will create a buffer consisting of 1024 "a" characters. Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
The return code from tls1_mac is supposed to be a boolean 0 for fail, 1 for success. In one place we returned -1 on error. This would cause code calling the mac function to erroneously see this as a success (because a non-zero value is being treated as success in all call sites). Fortunately, AFAICT, the place that returns -1 can only happen on an internal error so is not under attacker control. Additionally this code only appears in master. In 1.1.0 the return codes are treated differently. Therefore there are no security implications. Reviewed-by:
-
Pauli authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Diego Santa Cruz authored
With the -list option the srp app loops on the main while() endlessly, whether users were given on the command line or not. The loop should be stopped when in list mode and there are no more users. Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
Fixes #1526 Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
Fixes #1526 Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
We are quite inconsistent about which alerts get sent. Specifically, these alerts should be used (normally) in the following circumstances: SSL_AD_DECODE_ERROR = The peer sent a syntactically incorrect message SSL_AD_ILLEGAL_PARAMETER = The peer sent a message which was syntactically correct, but a parameter given is invalid for the context SSL_AD_HANDSHAKE_FAILURE = The peer's messages were syntactically and semantically correct, but the parameters provided were unacceptable to us (e.g. because we do not support the requested parameters) SSL_AD_INTERNAL_ERROR = We messed up (e.g. malloc failure) The standards themselves aren't always consistent but I think the above represents the best interpretation. Reviewed-by:
-
- 18 May, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
add_key_share() is a helper function used during key_share extension construction. It is expected to be a simple boolean success/fail return. It shouldn't be using the new EXT_RETURN type but it was partially converted anyway. This changes it back. Reviewed-by:
-
- 17 May, 2017 8 commits
-
-
Paul Yang authored
recocognised -> recognised CLA: trivial Signed-off-by:
Paul Yang <paulyang.inf@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Todd Short authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
Check that a missing sig algs extension succeeds if we are resuming. Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
The current TLSv1.3 spec says: 'If a server is authenticating via a certificate and the client has not sent a "signature_algorithms" extension, then the server MUST abort the handshake with a "missing_extension" alert (see Section 8.2).' If we are resuming then we are not "authenticating via a certificate" but we were still aborting with the missing_extension alert if sig algs was missing. This commit ensures that we only send the alert if we are not resuming. Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
We already did this on an ad-hoc per extension basis (for some extensions). This centralises it and makes sure we do it for all extensions. Reviewed-by:
-
Richard Levitte authored
Notifications can be (and should be) configured on account basis on the CI web site. This avoids getting emails to openssl-commits for personal accounts that also build OpenSSL stuff. Reviewed-by:
-
