Loading test/secmemtest.c +15 −10 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -82,18 +82,23 @@ static int test_sec_mem(void) * * CRYPTO_secure_malloc_init((size_t)1<<34, (size_t)1<<4); * * Which really only works on 64-bit systems, and even then the * code attempts to allocate 16 GB secure memory arena. Linux * can deal with this better than other Unixy OS's (e.g. MacOS) * but we don't want to push the system too hard during a unit * test. In addition, trying to allocate 16GB will cause the * mlock() call to fail, so that was at least changed to no * longer be an assert. If the reader of this comment really * wants to make sure that infinite loop is fixed, they can * enable the code below. * Which really only works on 64-bit systems, since it took 16 GB * secure memory arena to trigger the problem. It naturally takes * corresponding amount of available virtual and physical memory * for test to be feasible/representative. Since we can't assume * that every system is equipped with that much memory, the test * remains disabled. If the reader of this comment really wants * to make sure that infinite loop is fixed, they can enable the * code below. */ # if 0 /* This test should only be run under Linux... runner beware */ /*- * On Linux and BSD this test has a chance to complete in minimal * time and with minimum side effects, because mlock is likely to * fail because of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, which is customarily [much] * smaller than 16GB. In other words Linux and BSD users can be * limited by virtual space alone... */ if (sizeof(size_t) > 4) { TEST_info("Possible infinite loop: 1<<31 limit"); if (TEST_true(CRYPTO_secure_malloc_init((size_t)1<<34, (size_t)1<<4) != 0)) Loading Loading
test/secmemtest.c +15 −10 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -82,18 +82,23 @@ static int test_sec_mem(void) * * CRYPTO_secure_malloc_init((size_t)1<<34, (size_t)1<<4); * * Which really only works on 64-bit systems, and even then the * code attempts to allocate 16 GB secure memory arena. Linux * can deal with this better than other Unixy OS's (e.g. MacOS) * but we don't want to push the system too hard during a unit * test. In addition, trying to allocate 16GB will cause the * mlock() call to fail, so that was at least changed to no * longer be an assert. If the reader of this comment really * wants to make sure that infinite loop is fixed, they can * enable the code below. * Which really only works on 64-bit systems, since it took 16 GB * secure memory arena to trigger the problem. It naturally takes * corresponding amount of available virtual and physical memory * for test to be feasible/representative. Since we can't assume * that every system is equipped with that much memory, the test * remains disabled. If the reader of this comment really wants * to make sure that infinite loop is fixed, they can enable the * code below. */ # if 0 /* This test should only be run under Linux... runner beware */ /*- * On Linux and BSD this test has a chance to complete in minimal * time and with minimum side effects, because mlock is likely to * fail because of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, which is customarily [much] * smaller than 16GB. In other words Linux and BSD users can be * limited by virtual space alone... */ if (sizeof(size_t) > 4) { TEST_info("Possible infinite loop: 1<<31 limit"); if (TEST_true(CRYPTO_secure_malloc_init((size_t)1<<34, (size_t)1<<4) != 0)) Loading