Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

This is needed, because on VMS, select() can only be used on sockets.  being
able to use select() on all kinds of file descriptors is unique to Unix.

So, the solution for VMS is to create a layer that translates input from
standard input to socket communication.

Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Backport leak fix from master branch.

Thanks to Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.) for reporting this bug.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Thanks to Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.) for reporting this bug.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

This fixes the following error when building with no particular pointer size
is specified (implied 32 bit):

    static void *(*realloc_func) (void *, size_t) = realloc;
    ................................................^
    %CC-E-UNDECLARED, In the initializer for realloc_func, "_realloc32" is not declared.
    at line number 93 in file DEV:[OPENSSL102.crypto]mem.c;1

Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

The internal SRP function t_fromb64() converts from base64 to binary. It
does not validate that the size of the destination is sufficiently large -
that is up to the callers. In some places there was such a check, but not
in others.

Add an argument to t_fromb64() to provide the size of the destination
buffer and validate that we don't write too much data. Also add some sanity
checks to the callers where appropriate.

With thanks to Shi Lei for reporting this issue.

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 73f0df83)

A peer continually sending unrecognised warning alerts could mean that we
make no progress on a connection. We should abort rather than continuing if
we receive an unrecognised warning alert.

Thanks to Shi Lei for reporting this issue.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Backport leak fix from master branch.

Thanks to Shi Lei for reporting this bug.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

VMS sets that errno when the device part of a file spec is malformed
or a logical name that doesn't exist.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit e82e2186)

Some hardware devices don't provide the public EC_POINT data. The only
way for X509_check_private_key() to validate that the key matches a
given certificate is to actually perform a sign operation and then
verify it using the public key in the certificate.

Maybe that can come later, as discussed in issue 1532. But for now let's
at least make it fail gracefully and not crash.

GH: 1532

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1547)
(cherry picked from commit 92ed7fa5)

Never output -0; make "negative zero" an impossibility.
Do better checking on BN_rand top/bottom requirements and #bits.
Update doc.
Ignoring trailing garbage in BN_asc2bn.

Port this commit from boringSSL: https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/+/899b9b19a4cd3fe526aaf5047ab9234cdca19f7d%5E!/


        Ensure |BN_div| never gives negative zero in the no_branch code.

        Have |bn_correct_top| fix |bn->neg| if the input is zero so that we
        don't have negative zeros lying around.

        Thanks to Brian Smith for noticing.

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 01c09f9f)
(Some manual work required)

crypto/bn/*: x86[_64] division instruction doesn't handle constants, change constraint from 'g' to 'r'.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 68b4a6e9)

The function tls_construct_cert_status() is called by both TLS and DTLS
code. However it only ever constructed a TLS message header for the message
which obviously failed in DTLS.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

OPENSSL_cleanse() does not validate its input parameter for NULL so
SRP_create_verifier() should do so instead. Otherwise a segfault will
result.

Alternative solution to GitHub PR#1006

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

The definition of STITCHED_CALL relies on OPENSSL_NO_ASM.  However,
when a configuration simply lacks the assembler implementation for RC4
(which is where we have implemented the stitched call), OPENSSL_NO_ASM
isn't implemented.  Better, then, to rely on specific macros that
indicated that RC4 (and MD5) are implemented in assembler.

For this to work properly, we must also make sure Configure adds the
definition of RC4_ASM among the C flags.

(partly cherry picked from commit 216e8d91

)

Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

Fix a possible leak on NETSCAPE_SPKI_verify failure.

Backport of 0517538d
Backport of f6c006ea



Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>

(Modified for 1.0.2 by adding selected PACKET_xx() functions and PRF, and
subsequent cleanup from commit eb633d03

)

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 40425899200a3dea9ec3684d3eb80bcf50c99baf)

Baroque, almost uncommented code triggers behaviour which is undefined
by the C standard. You might quite reasonably not care that the code was
broken on ones-complement machines, but if we support a ubsan build then
we need to at least pretend to care.

It looks like the special-case code for 64-bit big-endian is going to
behave differently (and wrongly) on wrap-around, because it treats the
values as signed. That seems wrong, and allows replay and other attacks.
Surely you need to renegotiate and start a new epoch rather than
wrapping around to sequence number zero again?

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2e94723c)

Commit d8e8590e

 ("Fix missing return value checks in SCTP") made the
DTLS handshake fail, even for non-SCTP connections, if
SSL_export_keying_material() fails. Which it does, for DTLS1_BAD_VER.

Apply the trivial fix to make it succeed, since there's no real reason
why it shouldn't even though we never need it.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit c8a18468)

This also fixes no-tls which is an alias for no-tls1 in 1.0.2 (it is not
possible to do no-tls1_1 or no-tls1_2 in 1.0.2).

Because it is not possible to disable TLS1.1 or TLS1.2 it no longer follows
that disabling TLS1.0 should force the disabling of tlsext.

Also a few missing ifdef guards.

GitHub Iusse#935

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit d3034d31)

RT#4625

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit e3057a57)

Addition was not preserving inputs' property of being fully reduced.

Thanks to Brian Smith for reporting this.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit b62b2454)

Sessions are stored on the session_ctx, which doesn't change after
SSL_set_SSL_CTX().

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>

Thanks to Shi Lei for reporting this issue.

CVE-2016-6303

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 55d83bf7)

Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>

Use a ciphersuite in dtlstest that is not affected by no-* options.
Backport of commit fe34735c

.

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>

If a ticket callback changes the HMAC digest to SHA512 the existing
sanity checks are not sufficient and an attacker could perform a DoS
attack with a malformed ticket. Add additional checks based on
HMAC size.

Thanks to Shi Lei for reporting this bug.

CVE-2016-6302

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

We don't really have a mechanism to include other object files into a given
test program.  For now, a simple hack in mk1mf.pl will do.

RT#4653

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

a03f81f4

 added a malloc failure check to
EVP_PKEY_keygen, but there already was one.

Signed-off-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

GH: #1473

Fix an off by one error in the overflow check added by 07bed46f


("Check for errors in BN_bn2dec()").

Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 099e2968)

Also, re-organize RSA check to use goto err.
Try all checks, not just stopping at first (via Richard Levitte)

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 464d59a5)

Most of the time, this isn't strictly needed.  However, in the default
extern model (called relaxed refdef), symbols are treated as weak
common objects unless they are initialised.  The librarian doesn't
include weak symbols in the (static) libraries, which renders them
invisible when linking a program with said those libraries, which is a
problem at times.

Using the strict refdef model is much more like standard C on all
other platforms, and thereby avoid the issues that come with the
relaxed refdef model.

Note: this doesn't apply to VAX C.  It's possible that this will make
OpenSSL building with VAX C difficult some time in the future if it
isn't already.  However, VAX C is a very old compiler that we don't
expect to see too often, as DEC C (a.k.a VMS C) should have replaced
it a long time ago.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Some builds fail otherwise.

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>

The following would fail, or rather, freeze:

    openssl genrsa -out rsa2048.pem 2048
    openssl req -x509 -key rsa2048.pem -keyform PEM -out cert.pem

In that case, the second command wants to read a certificate request
from stdin, because -x509 wasn't fully flagged as being for creating
something new.  This changes makes it fully flagged.

RT#4655

Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

Original strategy for page-walking was adjust stack pointer and then
touch pages in order. This kind of asks for double-fault, because
if touch fails, then signal will be delivered to frame above adjusted
stack pointer. But touching pages prior adjusting stack pointer would
upset valgrind. As compromise let's adjust stack pointer in pages,
touching top of the stack. This still asks for double-fault, but at
least prevents corruption of neighbour stack if allocation is to
overstep the guard page.

Also omit predict-non-taken hints as they reportedly trigger illegal
instructions in some VM setups.

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 3ba1ef82)

In mempacket_test_read(), we've already fetched the top value of the
stack, so when we shift the stack, we don't care for the value.  The
compiler needs to be told, or it will complain harshly when we tell it
to be picky.

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 1c288878)

Follow on from CVE-2016-2179

The investigation and analysis of CVE-2016-2179 highlighted a related flaw.

This commit fixes a security "near miss" in the buffered message handling
code. Ultimately this is not currently believed to be exploitable due to
the reasons outlined below, and therefore there is no CVE for this on its
own.

The issue this commit fixes is a MITM attack where the attacker can inject
a Finished message into the handshake. In the description below it is
assumed that the attacker injects the Finished message for the server to
receive it. The attack could work equally well the other way around (i.e
where the client receives the injected Finished message).

The MITM requires the following capabilities:
- The ability to manipulate the MTU that the client selects such that it
is small enough for the client to fragment Finished messages.
- The ability to selectively drop and modify records sent from the client
- The ability to inject its own records and send them to the server

The MITM forces the client to select a small MTU such that the client
will fragment the Finished message. Ideally for the attacker the first
fragment will contain all but the last byte of the Finished message,
with the second fragment containing the final byte.

During the handshake and prior to the client sending the CCS the MITM
injects a plaintext Finished message fragment to the server containing
all but the final byte of the Finished message. The message sequence
number should be the one expected to be used for the real Finished message.

OpenSSL will recognise that the received fragment is for the future and
will buffer it for later use.

After the client sends the CCS it then sends its own Finished message in
two fragments. The MITM causes the first of these fragments to be
dropped. The OpenSSL server will then receive the second of the fragments
and reassemble the complete Finished message consisting of the MITM
fragment and the final byte from the real client.

The advantage to the attacker in injecting a Finished message is that
this provides the capability to modify other handshake messages (e.g.
the ClientHello) undetected. A difficulty for the attacker is knowing in
advance what impact any of those changes might have on the final byte of
the handshake hash that is going to be sent in the "real" Finished
message. In the worst case for the attacker this means that only 1 in
256 of such injection attempts will succeed.

It may be possible in some situations for the attacker to improve this such
that all attempts succeed. For example if the handshake includes client
authentication then the final message flight sent by the client will
include a Certificate. Certificates are ASN.1 objects where the signed
portion is DER encoded. The non-signed portion could be BER encoded and so
the attacker could re-encode the certificate such that the hash for the
whole handshake comes to a different value. The certificate re-encoding
would not be detectable because only the non-signed portion is changed. As
this is the final flight of messages sent from the client the attacker
knows what the complete hanshake hash value will be that the client will
send - and therefore knows what the final byte will be. Through a process
of trial and error the attacker can re-encode the certificate until the
modified handhshake also has a hash with the same final byte. This means
that when the Finished message is verified by the server it will be
correct in all cases.

In practice the MITM would need to be able to perform the same attack
against both the client and the server. If the attack is only performed
against the server (say) then the server will not detect the modified
handshake, but the client will and will abort the connection.
Fortunately, although OpenSSL is vulnerable to Finished message
injection, it is not vulnerable if *both* client and server are OpenSSL.
The reason is that OpenSSL has a hard "floor" for a minimum MTU size
that it will never go below. This minimum means that a Finished message
will never be sent in a fragmented form and therefore the MITM does not
have one of its pre-requisites. Therefore this could only be exploited
if using OpenSSL and some other DTLS peer that had its own and separate
Finished message injection flaw.

The fix is to ensure buffered messages are cleared on epoch change.

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>