- Mar 15, 2018
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
It is quite likely for there to be multiple certificates with empty subjects, which are still distinct because of subjectAltName. Therefore we allow multiple certificates with an empty Subject even if unique_subject is set to yes. Reviewed-by:
Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5627)
-
Matt Caswell authored
Commit 87e8feca (16 years ago!) introduced a bug where if we are attempting to insert a cert with a duplicate subject name, and duplicate subject names are not allowed (which is the default), then we get an unhelpful error message back (error number 2). Prior to that commit we got a helpful error message which displayed details of the conflicting entry in the database. That commit was itself attempting to fix a bug with the noemailDN option where we were setting the subject field in the database too early (before extensions had made any amendments to it). This PR moves the check for a conflicting Subject name until after all changes to the Subject have been made by extensions etc. This also, co-incidentally fixes the ca crashing bug described in issue 5109. Fixes #5109 Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
This reverts commit f2982ad7 . Empty Subjects should be permissible. Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
This reverts commit 462163e9 . Empty subjects should be permissible. Reviewed-by:
-
- Mar 12, 2018
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
We should be using ASN1_OBJECT_free() not OPENSSL_free(). Fixes #5568 Reviewed-by:
Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5598)
-
Matt Caswell authored
If a mem allocation failed we would ignore it. This commit fixes it to always check. Reviewed-by:
-
Andy Polyakov authored
So far assembly modules were built as .pl->.S->.s followed by .s->.o. This posed a problem in build_all_generated rule if it was executed on another computer. So we change rule sequence to .pl->.S and then .S->.s->.o. (backport of a23f0316 ) Reviewed-by:
-
- Mar 11, 2018
-
-
Kurt Roeckx authored
Reviewed-by:Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> GH: #5582
-
- Mar 10, 2018
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
There are things depending on configdata.pm. However, it's perfectly possible that there is one in the source directory from a previous build, and that might disrupt an out of source build. To avoid this conflict, make sure never to use the source tree configdata.pm in that case, i.e. make the hard assumption that it's a generated file in the build tree, which it is. Reviewed-by:
Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5546) (cherry picked from commit 846e4c4d)
-
Richard Levitte authored
When generating the correct inclusion directory for DEPEND, we mangled it to be relative to the build or the source directory. However, the value we handle already come with a correct directory, so we only need to use it as is. Fixes #5543 Reviewed-by:
-
- Mar 09, 2018
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by:
-
- Mar 08, 2018
-
-
Andy Polyakov authored
-fno-common was removed for all Darwin targets in 0c873419 with rationale "it's either 'ranlib -c' or '-fno-common'." However, it's still absolutely required in 32-bit darwin-ppc-cc. And when trying things out I didn't quite see why it was formulated as one-or-another choice, as 'ranlib -c' shouldn't [and doesn't] have problems with object modules without commons. [Well, to be frank, I didn't manage to reproduce the problem the modification was meaning to resolve either...] (backport of 107783d9 ) Reviewed-by:
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Richard Levitte authored
Fixes #5310 Reviewed-by:
-
- Mar 07, 2018
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
We have never used these variables with the Unix Makefile, and there's no reason for us to change this, so to avoid confusion, we remove them. Reviewed-by:
-
Dr. Matthias St. Pierre authored
BIO_get_mem_data() and BIO_get_mem_ptr() assign to *pp, not pp Reviewed-by:
-
- Mar 06, 2018
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by:
-
knekritz authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Dr. Matthias St. Pierre authored
The 'pp' function parameters of d2i_TYPE() and i2d_TYPE() are referenced in the DESCRIPTION section as 'in' resp. 'out'. This commit renames the references to 'ppin' resp. 'ppout' and adds an explaining sentence. Reviewed-by:
-
- Mar 04, 2018
-
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Richard Levitte authored
Rely on the build.info constructor to do the right thing. Fixes #5500 Reviewed-by:
-
- Mar 03, 2018
-
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by:
Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5493) (cherry picked from commit 014cc4b2)
-
Bernd Edlinger authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Alex Gaynor authored
Reviewed-by:
Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com> Reviewed-by:
-
- Mar 01, 2018
-
-
Ivan Filenko authored
CLA: trivial Reviewed-by:
-
Brad Spencer authored
CLA: trivial Reviewed-by:
-
- Feb 28, 2018
-
-
David Benjamin authored
Thumb2 addresses are a bit a mess, depending on whether a label is interpreted as a function pointer value (for use with BX and BLX) or as a program counter value (for use with PC-relative addressing). Clang's integrated assembler mis-assembles this code. See https://crbug.com/124610#c54 for details. Instead, use the ADR pseudo-instruction which has clear semantics and should be supported by every assembler that handles the OpenSSL Thumb2 code. (In other files, the ADR vs SUB conditionals are based on __thumb2__ already. For some reason, this one is based on __APPLE__, I'm guessing to deal with an older version of clang assembler.) It's unclear to me which of clang or binutils is "correct" or if this is even a well-defined notion beyond "whatever binutils does". But I will note that https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4669 suggests binutils has also changed behavior around this before. Reviewed-by:
-
- Feb 26, 2018
-
-
Dr. Matthias St. Pierre authored
Fixes #5405, #1381 The base64 filter BIO reads its input in chunks of B64_BLOCK_SIZE bytes. When processing input in PEM format it can happen in rare cases that - the trailing PEM marker crosses the boundary of a chunk, and - the beginning of the following chunk contains valid base64 encoded data. This happened in issue #5405, where the PEM marker was split into "-----END CER" and "TIFICATE-----" at the end of the first chunk. The decoding of the first chunk terminated correctly at the '-' character, which is treated as an EOF marker, and b64_read() returned. However, when called the second time, b64_read() read the next chunk and interpreted the string "TIFICATE" as valid base64 encoded data, adding 6 extra bytes '4c 81 48 08 04 c4'. This patch restores the assignment of the error code to 'ctx->cont', which was deleted accidentally in commit 5562cfac and which prevents b64_read() from reading additional data on subsequent calls. This issue was observed and reported by Annie Yousar. Reviewed-by:
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Even though mlock(2) was standardized in POSIX.1-2001, vendors did implement it prior that point. Reviewed-by:
-
- Feb 24, 2018
-
-
Andy Polyakov authored
So far check for availability of Win32::API served as implicit check for $^O being MSWin32. Reportedly it's not safe assumption, and check for MSWin32 has to be explicit. Reviewed-by:
Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by:
-
- Feb 23, 2018
-
-
Bernd Edlinger authored
Reviewed-by:
-
- Feb 22, 2018
-
-
Per Sandström authored
CLA: trivial fix typo: EC_point2buf => EC_POINT_point2buf Reviewed-by:
-
- Feb 21, 2018
-
-
Pavel Kopyl authored
The memory pointed to by the 'push' is freed by the X509_NAME_ENTRY_free() in do_body(). The second time it is referenced to (indirectly) in certify_cert:X509_REQ_free(). Reviewed-by:
-
Pavel Kopyl authored
X509v3_add_ext: free 'sk' if the memory pointed to by it was malloc-ed inside this function. X509V3_EXT_add_nconf_sk: return an error if X509v3_add_ext() fails. This prevents use of a freed memory in do_body:sk_X509_EXTENSION_num(). Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
This could in theory result in an overread - but due to the over allocation of the underlying buffer does not represent a security issue. Thanks to Fedor Indutny for reporting this issue. Reviewed-by:
-
- Feb 19, 2018
-
-
Massimiliano Pala authored
This function makes it easier to retrieve a reference to the authority key identifier (akid->keyid) inside a certificate. Reviewed-by:
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by:
Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by:
-
- Feb 15, 2018
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
The function can fail so we should check the return code. Found by Coverity Reviewed-by:
Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5339) (cherry picked from commit 0d502c35)
-
