Skip to content
  1. Jul 11, 2017
    • Evgeny Kotkov's avatar
      mpm_winnt: Remove a duplicated comment in the child_main() function. · d2c26c3b
      Evgeny Kotkov authored 
      
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@1801656 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
      d2c26c3b
    • Evgeny Kotkov's avatar
      mpm_winnt: Use a LIFO stack instead of a FIFO queue to hold unused · 9db53e77
      Evgeny Kotkov authored 
      completion contexts, as that may significantly reduce the memory usage.

This simple change can have a noticeable impact on the amount of memory
consumed by the child process in various cases.  Every completion context
in the queue has an associated allocator, and every allocator has it's
ap_max_mem_free memory limit which is not given back to the operating
system.  Once the queue grows, it cannot shrink back, and every allocator
in each of the queued completion contexts keeps up to its max_free amount
of memory.  The queue can only grow when a server has to serve multiple
concurrent connections at once.

With that in mind, consider a case with a server that doesn't encounter many
concurrent connections most of the time, but has occasional spikes when
it has to serve multiple concurrent connections.  During such spikes, the
size of the completion context queue grows.

The actual difference between using LIFO and FIFO orders shows up after
such spikes, when the server is back to light load and doesn't see a lot
of concurrency.  With FIFO order, every completion context in the queue
will be used in a round-robin manner, thus using *every* available allocator
one by one and ultimately claiming up to (N * ap_max_mem_free memory) from
the OS.  With LIFO order, only the completion contexts that are close to
the top of the stack will be used and reused for subsequent connections.
Hence, only a small part of the allocators will be used, and this can
prevent all other allocators from unnecessarily acquiring memory from
the OS (and keeping it), and this reduces the overall memory footprint.

Please note that this change doesn't affect the worst case behavior, as
it's still (N * ap_max_mem_free memory), but tends to behave better in
practice, for the reasons described above.

Another thing worth considering is the new behavior when the OS decides
to swap out pages of the child process, for example, in a close-to-OOM
condition.  Handling every new connection after the swap requires the OS
to load the memory pages for the allocator from the completion context that
is used for this connection.  With FIFO order, the completion contexts are
used one by one, and this would cause page loads for every new connection.
With LIFO order, there will be almost no swapping, since the same completion
context is going to be reused for subsequent new connections.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@1801655 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
      9db53e77
    • Evgeny Kotkov's avatar
      mpm_winnt: Drop the APLOG_DEBUG diagnostic saying how many thread · 8dbdd95c
      Evgeny Kotkov authored 
      are blocked on the I/O completion port during the shutdown.

Prior to r1801635, the shutdown code required to know the amount of blocked
threads, as it has been dispatching the same amount of completion packets.
But this no longer holds, and the only reason why we maintain the
corresponding g_blocked_threads variable is because of this debug
diagnostic message.

Drop it in order to reduce complexity of the quite critical code in the
winnt_get_connection() function and to reduce the amount of global
variables.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@1801640 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
      8dbdd95c
    • Evgeny Kotkov's avatar
      mpm_winnt: Remove an unnecessary Sleep() in the winnt_accept() function. · 062c97a3
      Evgeny Kotkov authored 
      This sleep occured in a situation when:

 - We don't have a free completion context in the queue
 - We can't add one, as doing so would exceed the max_num_completion_contexts
   limit (all worker threads are busy)
 - We have exceeded a 1 second timeout while waiting for it

In this case, the Sleep() call is unnecessary, as there is no intermittent
failure that can be waited out, but rather than that, it's an ordinary
situation with all workers being busy.  Presumably, calling Sleep() here
can be even considered harmful, as it affects the fairness between the
listeners that are blocked waiting for the completion context.

So, instead of calling Sleep() just check for the possible shutdown and
immediately retry acquiring a completion context.  If all worker threads
are still busy, the retry will block in the same WaitForSingleObject() call,
which is fine.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@1801639 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
      062c97a3
    • Evgeny Kotkov's avatar
      mpm_winnt: Simplify the shutdown code that was waiting for multiple worker · 3168d3f9
      Evgeny Kotkov authored 
      thread handles in batches.

Starting from r1801636, there is no difference between ending the wait with
one or multiple remaining threads.  This is because we terminate the process
if at least one thread is still active when we hit a timeout.

Therefore, instead of making an effort to evenly distribute and batch the
handles with WaitForMultipleObjects(), we could just start from one end,
and wait for one thread handle at a time.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@1801637 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
      3168d3f9
    • Evgeny Kotkov's avatar
      mpm_winnt: Avoid using TerminateThread() in case the shutdown routine · 3b84b357
      Evgeny Kotkov authored 
      hits a timeout while waiting for the worker threads to exit.

Using TerminateThread() can have dangerous consequences such as deadlocks —
say, if the the thread is terminated while holding a lock or a heap lock
in the middle of HeapAlloc(), as these locks would not be released.
Or it can corrupt the application state and cause a crash.

(See https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms686717)

Rework the code to call TerminateProcess() in the described circumstances
and leave the cleanup to the operating system.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@1801636 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
      3b84b357
    • Evgeny Kotkov's avatar
      mpm_winnt: Make the shutdown faster by avoiding unnecessary Sleep()'s · 1c96d681
      Evgeny Kotkov authored 
      when shutting down the worker threads.

Previously, the shutdown code was posting an amount of I/O completion
packets equal to the amount of the threads blocked on the I/O completion
port.  Then it would Sleep() until all these threads "acknowledge" the
completion packets by decrementing the global amount of blocked threads.

A better way would be to send the number of IOCP_SHUTDOWN completion
packets equal to the total amount of threads and immediately proceed to
the next step.  There is no need to block until the threads actually receive
the completion, as the shutdown process includes a separate step that waits
until the threads exit, and the new approach avoids an unnecessary delay.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@1801635 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
      1c96d681
    • Jean-Frederic Clere's avatar
      · 4c7fa22a
      Jean-Frederic Clere authored 
      Add logic to read the Upgrade header and use it in the response.
Use we you are proxying to a server that has multiple upgrade on the same IP/Port.
PR 61142


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@1801594 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
      4c7fa22a
  3. Jul 10, 2017
  5. Jul 07, 2017
  7. Jul 06, 2017
  9. Jul 05, 2017
  11. Jul 04, 2017
  13. Jul 03, 2017
  15. Jul 02, 2017
  17. Jun 30, 2017
  19. Jun 29, 2017
  21. Jun 28, 2017
  23. Jun 26, 2017