- Nov 17, 2016
-
-
Nicola Tuveri authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1658)
-
Nicola Tuveri authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1658)
-
Nicola Tuveri authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1658)
-
Nicola Tuveri authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1658)
-
Nicola Tuveri authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1658)
-
Nicola Tuveri authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1658)
-
Nicola Tuveri authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1658)
-
Nicola Tuveri authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1658)
-
Nicola Tuveri authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1658)
-
Nicola Tuveri authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1658)
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
FdaSilvaYY authored
Both strdup or malloc failure should raise à err. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1905)
-
FdaSilvaYY authored
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1905)
-
Rich Salz authored
Use \b on NOEXIST and EXPORT_VAR_AS_FUNC patterns as suggested by Andy. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1912)
-
- Nov 16, 2016
-
-
Rob Percival authored
This reflects its position in include/openssl/ct.h. Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1548)
-
Rob Percival authored
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1548)
-
Rob Percival authored
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1548)
-
Rob Percival authored
Otherwise, |dec| gets moved past the end of the signature by o2i_SCT_signature and then can't be correctly freed afterwards. Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1548)
-
Rob Percival authored
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1548)
-
Rob Percival authored
This gives better code coverage and is more representative of how a user would likely construct an SCT (using the base64 returned by a CT log). Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1548)
-
Richard Levitte authored
The rationale is that the linux-x86 is the most likely config target to evolve and should therefore be chosen when possible, while linux-elf is mostly reserved for older Linux machines. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1924)
-
Richard Levitte authored
'linux-x86' is similar to 'linux-x86_64' but uses -m32 rather than -m64. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1924)
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
ssl_test_old was reaching inside the SSL structure and changing the internal BIO values. This is completely unneccessary, and was causing an abort in the test when enabling TLSv1.3. I also removed the need for ssl_test_old to include ssl_locl.h. This required the addition of some missing accessors for SSL_COMP name and id fields. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
No need to continually get the list of supported curves for the client and server. Just do it once. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Numerous style issues as well as references to TLS1_3_VERSION instead of SSL_IS_TLS13(s) Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
The previous commits put in place the logic to exchange key_share data. We now need to do something with that information. In <= TLSv1.2 the equivalent of the key_share extension is the ServerKeyExchange and ClientKeyExchange messages. With key_share those two messages are no longer necessary. The commit removes the SKE and CKE messages from the TLSv1.3 state machine. TLSv1.3 is completely different to TLSv1.2 in the messages that it sends and the transitions that are allowed. Therefore, rather than extend the existing <=TLS1.2 state transition functions, we create a whole new set for TLSv1.3. Intially these are still based on the TLSv1.2 ones, but over time they will be amended. The new TLSv1.3 transitions remove SKE and CKE completely. There's also some cleanup for some stuff which is not relevant to TLSv1.3 and is easy to remove, e.g. the DTLS support (we're not doing DTLSv1.3 yet) and NPN. I also disable EXTMS for TLSv1.3. Using it was causing some a...
-
Matt Caswell authored
This is a temporary fix for while we are still using the old session resumption logic in the TLSv1.3 code. Due to differences in EXTMS support we can't resume a <=TLSv1.2 session in a TLSv1.3 connection (the EXTMS consistency check causes the connection to abort). This causes test failures. Ultimately we will rewrite the session resumption logic for TLSv1.3 so this problem will go away. But until then we need a quick fix to keep the tests happy. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
At the moment the server doesn't yet do anything with this information. We still need to send the server's key_share info back to the client. That will happen in subsequent commits. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-