- Mar 27, 2018
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
If we don't have OID data for an object then we should fail if we are asked to encode the ASN.1 for that OID. Fixes #5723 Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5725)
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Comparison was effectively reduced to least significant bits. CVE-2018-0733 Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Constructed types with a recursive definition (such as can be found in PKCS7) could eventually exceed the stack given malicious input with excessive recursion. Therefore we limit the stack depth. CVE-2018-0739 Credit to OSSFuzz for finding this issue. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- Mar 26, 2018
-
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5756)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Bernd Edlinger authored
openssl x509 -in server.pem -signkey privkey.pem -out server.pem Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5746)
-
Bernd Edlinger authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5744)
-
- Mar 25, 2018
-
-
Bernd Edlinger authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5741)
-
Philippe Antoine authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5675)
-
- Mar 24, 2018
-
-
Andy Polyakov authored
'nmake clean' was leaving some artefacts behind. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- Mar 23, 2018
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
myDSO_dsobyaddr and myDSO_free are only used in a narrow block of code, and can therefore be made local to that block. Otherwise, some compilers may warn that they are unused. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5733)
-
Richard Levitte authored
These errors were hidden because compiling this file didn't get the macros derived from the dso_scheme attribute, and therefore, some code never got compiled. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5733)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5733)
-
Richard Levitte authored
The macros resulting from the dso_scheme attribute were defined for libraries only, but there's a test program that uses the macros as well. The easier way is to move the handling of this macro to crypto/include/internal/dso_conf.h and having the modules that need it include it. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5733)
-
- Mar 22, 2018
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
.res files weren't treated consistently. They weren't included at all in the build of a shared library, and were named inconsistently; .res sometimes, and .res.o otherwise. Now we standardise it to .res.o, which is the recommended way with GNU tools. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5730)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5713)
-
Bernd Edlinger authored
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5412)
-
Rich Salz authored
Add it to apps as well as libraries. Fix the copyright year generation. Thanks to user RTT for pointing this out. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5704)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4159)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4159)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Some platforms, cough-DJGPP, fail to compile claiming that requested alignment is greater than maximum possible. Supposedly original alignment was result of an attempt to utilize AVX2... Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5708)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
In other words no-sock DJGPP build should suppress syslogging. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5708)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
At earlier point e_os.h was omitted from a number of headers (in order to emphasize OS neutrality), but this affected o_fopen.c, which is not OS-neutral, and contains some DJGPP-specific code. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5708)
-
- Mar 21, 2018
-
-
Pauli authored
The strsignal call is not supported by some machines, so avoid its use. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5658)
-
Patrick Steuer authored
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> GH: #5580
-
Kurt Roeckx authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> GH: #5580
-
FdaSilvaYY authored
Add missing guards around STRP-related fields Remove two unneeded global variables: my 2'cents to #4679 Merge definition and instantiation of srpsrvparm global. Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4908)
-
Matt Caswell authored
Fixes #5711 Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5712)
-
Philippe Antoine authored
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5706)
-
David Benjamin authored
In particular, x and y may be NULL, as used in ecdsa_ossl.c. Make use of this in ecdh_ossl.c as well, to save an otherwise unnecessary temporary. Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5532)
-
Bernd Edlinger authored
Various code-cleanups. Use SSL_CTX_set_mode(ctx, SSL_MODE_AUTO_RETRY) insead of handling SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ everywhere. Turn off the linger option on connected sockets to avoid failure. Add BIO_set_conn_mode(conn, BIO_SOCK_NODELAY) to improve thruput. Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3952)
-
Jack Bates authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2181)
-
Matt Caswell authored
For DTLS/SCTP we were waiting for a dry event during the call to tls_finish_handshake(). This function just tidies up various internal things, and after it completes the handshake is over. I can find no good reason for waiting for a dry event here, and nothing in RFC6083 suggests to me that we should need to. More importantly though it seems to be wrong. It is perfectly possible for a peer to send app data/alerts/new handshake while we are still cleaning up our handshake. If this happens then we will never get the dry event and so we cannot continue. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5084)
-
Matt Caswell authored
At a couple of points in a DTLS/SCTP handshake we need to wait for a dry event before continuing. However if an alert has been sent by the peer then we will never receive that dry event and an infinite loop results. This commit changes things so that we attempt to read a message if we are waiting for a dry event but haven't got one yet. This should never succeed, but any alerts will be processed. Fixes #4763 Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5084)
-
Peter Wu authored
Fixes regression from #5667. Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5701)
-