Add a note as to how these functions do not always return the key size, and
how one can deal with that.

PR: 907

PR: 904

PR: 905

use it.

Notified by Frédéric L. W. Meunier <0@pervalidus.tk> in PR 713

well.

Notified by Frank Kardel <kardel@acm.org> in PR 879.

some similar code elsewhere.

Thanks to Francesco Petruzzi for bringing this to my attention.

PR: 854

PR: 847

PR: 849

by using the Codenomicon TLS Test Tool (CAN-2004-0079)

Prepare for 0.9.6m tagging and release

Submitted by: Steven Henson
Reviewed by: Joe Orton
Approved by: Mark Cox

If -offset exceeds -length of data available exit with an error.

Don't read past end of total data available when -offset supplied.

If -length exceeds total available truncate it.

therefore be static.  Furthermore, send_mem_chars() is unused, so I
#if 0'd it.

Adding a slash between the directoryt and the file is a problem with
VMS.  The C RTL can handle it well if the "directory" is a logical
name with no colon, therefore ending being 'logname/file'.  However,
if the given logical names actually has a colon, or if you use a full
VMS-syntax directory, you end up with 'logname:/file' or
'dev:[dir1.dir2]/file', and that isn't handled in any good way.

So, on VMS, we need to check if the directory string ends with a
separator (one of ':', ']' or '>' (< and > can be used instead [ and
])), and handle that by not inserting anything between the directory
spec and the file name.  In all other cases, it's assumed the
directory spec is a logical name, so we need to place a colon between
it and the file.

Notified by Kevin Greaney <kevin.greaney@hp.com>.

but never made to 0_9_6...
PR: 811

if the give size is 0.

This is a thought that came up in PR 751.

PR: 755
Notified by: Jakub Bogusz <qboosh@pld-linux.org>

Therefore, change all instances of the symbol 'list' to something else.

PR: 758
Submitted by: Frédéric Giudicelli <groups@newpki.org>

compared it to the amount of bits required...
PR: 770
Submitted by: c zhang <czhang2005@hotmail.com>

PR: 771
Submitted by: c zhang <czhang2005@hotmail.com>

PR: 777
Submitted by: Michael Shields <mshields@sunblocksystems.com>

PR: #759
Submitted by: Martin Kraemer <Martin.Kraemer@Fujitsu-Siemens.com>

certain ASN.1 tags (CAN-2003-0851)

prototypes, so I'm removing -Wstrict-prototypes and
-Wmissing-prototypes from my debugging target in favor of
-Wmissing-declarations.  That will make other issues more visible than
in the middle of a thousand warnings telling me there isn't a proper
prototype for this or that function pointer...