- May 23, 2016
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
README is a fairly independent document, and so is INSTALL. NOTES are merely addendums to INSTALL. Therefore , INSTALL.DJGPP and README.PERL get renamed to NOTES.DJGPP and NOTES.PERL. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Todd Short authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
FdaSilvaYY authored
Fix possible leak in danetest.c Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
FdaSilvaYY authored
from BoringSSL 306ece31bcaaed49e0240a2e5555f8901ebb2d45 Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
FdaSilvaYY authored
Inspired from PR #873. Nearly same as 2bbf0baa . Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
FdaSilvaYY authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
- May 22, 2016
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
LHASH_NODE was used internally, which doesn't work when configured 'no-deprecated' Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
(i.e. remove some bugs) Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Kurt Roeckx authored
Found by tis-interpreter Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> GH: #1106
-
Kurt Roeckx authored
Found by tis-interpreter Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> GH: #1106
-
- May 21, 2016
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
RT#4471 Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
FdaSilvaYY authored
tofree pointer is no more used... Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1103)
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Fix some code examples, trailing whitespace Fix TBA sections in verify, remove others. Remove empty sections Use Mixed Case not ALL CAPS in head2 Enhance doc-nits script. Remove extra =cut line Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- May 20, 2016
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
The function InitOnceExceuteOnce is the best way to support the implementation of CRYPTO_THREAD_run_once() on Windows. Unfortunately WinXP doesn't have it. To get around that we had two different implementations: one for WinXP and one for later versions. Which one was used was based on the value of _WIN32_WINNT. This approach was starting to cause problems though because other parts of OpenSSL assume _WIN32_WINNT is going to be 0x0501 and crashes were occurring dependant on include file ordering. In addition a conditional based on _WIN32_WINNT had made its way into a public header file through commit 5c4328f0 . This is problematic because the value of this macro can vary between OpenSSL build time and application build time. The simplest solution to this mess is just to always use the WinXP version of CRYPTO_THREAD_run_once(). Its perhaps slightly sub-optimal but probably not noticably. GitHub Issue #1086 Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Rename sk_xxx to OPENSSL_sk_xxx and _STACK to OPENSSL_STACK Rename lh_xxx API to OPENSSL_LH_xxx and LHASH_NODE to OPENSSL_LH_NODE Make lhash stuff opaque. Use typedefs for function pointers; makes the code simpler. Remove CHECKED_xxx macros. Add documentation; remove old X509-oriented doc. Add API-compat names for entire old API Reviewed-by: Dr. Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Giving setbuf() a 64-bit pointer isn't faulty, as the argument is passed by a 64-bit register anyway, so you only get a warning (MAYLOSEDATA2) pointing out that only the least significant 32 bits will be used. However, we know that a FILE* returned by fopen() and such really is a 32-bit pointer (a study of the system header files make that clear), so we temporarly turn off that warning when calling setbuf(). Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
This adds an async IO test. There are two test runs. The first one does a normal handshake with lots of async IO events. The second one does the same but this time breaks up all the written records into multiple records of one byte in length. We do this all the way up until the CCS. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
In the new state machine if using nbio and we get the header of a handshake message is one record with the body in the next, with an nbio event in the middle, then the connection was failing. This is because s->init_num was getting reset. We should only reset it after we have read the whole message. RT#4394 Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
David Benjamin authored
ChangeCipherSpec messages have a defined value. They also may not occur in the middle of a handshake message. The current logic will accept a ChangeCipherSpec with value 2. It also would accept up to three bytes of handshake data before the ChangeCipherSpec which it would discard (because s->init_num gets reset). Instead, require that s->init_num is 0 when a ChangeCipherSpec comes in. RT#4391 Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
The write BIO for handshake messages is bufferred so that we only write out to the network when we have a complete flight. There was some complexity in the buffering logic so that we switched buffering on and off at various points through out the handshake. The only real reason to do this was historically it complicated the state machine when you wanted to flush because you had to traverse through the "flush" state (in order to cope with NBIO). Where we knew up front that there was only going to be one message in the flight we switched off buffering to avoid that. In the new state machine there is no longer a need for a flush state so it is simpler just to have buffering on for the whole handshake. This also gives us the added benefit that we can simply call flush after every flight even if it only has one message in it. This means that BIO authors can implement their own buffering strategies and not have to be aware of the state of the SSL object (previously they would have to switch off their own buffering during the handshake because they could not rely on a flush being received when they really needed to write data out). This last point addresses GitHub Issue #322. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
RT#4543 Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Add doc-nit-check to help find future issues. Make podchecker be almost clean. Remove trailing whitespace. Tab expansion Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- May 19, 2016
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
RT#1817 Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
the fact that it's community-supported target. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
GH: #102 Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Defintions of macros similar to _XOPEN_SOURCE belong in command line or in worst case prior first #include directive in source. As for macros is was allegedly controlling. One can argue that we are probably better off demanding S_IS* macros but there are systems that just don't comply, hence this compromise solution... Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
In the X509 app check that the obtained public key is valid before we attempt to use it. Issue reported by Yuan Jochen Kang. Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-