- Oct 28, 2016
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
Rename some parameters. Also change handling of buffer sizes >INT_MAX in length. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
They should return 0 for a failure (retryable or not), and 1 for a success. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
In converting a new style BIO_read() call into an old one, read as much data as we can (INT_MAX), if the size of the buffer is >INT_MAX. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Also extend BIO_METHOD to be able to supply an implementation for the new BIO_write_ex function. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Also extend BIO_METHOD to be able to supply an implementation for the new BIO_read function. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Providing a spkac file with no default section causes a double free. Thanks to Brian Carpenter for reporting this issue. Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
A BIO_read() 0 return indicates that a failure occurred that may be retryable. An SSL_read() 0 return indicates a non-retryable failure. Check that if BIO_read() returns 0, SSL_read() returns <0. Same for SSL_write(). The asyncio test filter BIO already returns 0 on a retryable failure so we build on that. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
A zero return from BIO_read()/BIO_write() could mean that an IO operation is retryable. A zero return from SSL_read()/SSL_write() means that the connection has been closed down (either cleanly or not). Therefore we should not propagate a zero return value from BIO_read()/BIO_write() back up the stack to SSL_read()/SSL_write(). This could result in a retryable failure being treated as fatal. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- Oct 26, 2016
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Move manpages to manX directories Add Windows/VMS install fix from Richard Levitte Update README Fix typo's Remove some duplicates Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
The current version of the VMS compiler provides C99 features, strictly language wise. Unfortunately, even the most recent standard library isn't fully updated for that standard, so we need to use an earlier standard that the compiler supports. Most importantly, this affects the __STDC_VERSION__ value, which the compiler unfortunately currently defaults to 199901L. With this change we won't have to give VMS special treatment when looking for features based on that macro. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1785)
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
- Oct 25, 2016
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1767)
-
Richard Levitte authored
This is overdue since the addition of the unified build system Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1767)
-
- Oct 24, 2016
-
-
Andy Polyakov authored
[And remove FPU mutiplication subroutine.] Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1629)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- Oct 22, 2016
-
-
Kurt Roeckx authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> GH: #1770
-
jrmarino authored
The __DragonFly__ macros were introduced in issue #1546 along with a function naming fix, but it was decided they should be handled separately. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1765)
-
- Oct 21, 2016
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1768)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1759)
-
Claus Assmann authored
CLA: trivial Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1762)
-
Rich Salz authored
Add DragonFly version of BSD. Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1584)
-
- Oct 19, 2016
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1643)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1643)
-
Richard Levitte authored
In apps/apps.c, one can set up an engine with setup_engine(). However, we freed the structural reference immediately, which means that for engines that don't already have a structural reference somewhere else (because it's a built in engine), we end up returning an invalid reference. Instead, the function release_engine() is added, and called at the end of the routines that call setup_engine(). Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1643)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1686)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1686)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1686)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Also, fix __wrap_cmd so it doesn't return unnecessary empty strings Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1686)
-
Richard Levitte authored
So far, apps and test programs, were a bit rigidely accessible as executables or perl scripts. But what about scripts in some other language? Or what about running entirely external programs? The answer is certainly not to add new functions to access scripts for each language or wrapping all the external program calls in our magic! Instead, this adds a new functions, cmd(), which is useful to access executables and scripts in a more generalised manner. app(), test(), fuzz(), perlapp() and perltest() are rewritten in terms of cmd(), and serve as examples how to do something similar for other scripting languages, or constrain the programs to certain directories. Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1686)
-