- Mar 24, 2017
-
-
Andy Polyakov authored
This module is used only with odd input lengths, i.e. not used in normal PKI cases, on contemporary processors. The problem was "illuminated" by fuzzing tests. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- Mar 23, 2017
-
-
Rich Salz authored
[skip ci] Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3021)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3019)
-
- Mar 22, 2017
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3014)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
One could have fixed the problem by arranging 64-bit alignment of EVP_AES_OCB_CTX.aad_buf in evp/e_aes.c, but CRYPTO_ocb128_aad prototype doesn't imply alignment and we have to honour it. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2994)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Initial IV was disregarded on SHAEXT-capable processors. Amazingly enough bulk AES128-SHA* talk-to-yourself tests were passing. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2992)
-
Andy Polyakov authored
As hinted by its name new subroutine processes 8 input blocks in parallel by loading data to 512-bit registers. It still needs more work, as it needs to handle some specific input lengths better. In this sense it's yet another intermediate step... Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3012)
-
- Mar 21, 2017
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
[extended tests] Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3007)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Some of the external tests do not run well with 'no-shared' Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3007)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Also, be less silent when installing, so possible errors are shown. [extended tests] Fixes #3005 Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3007)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3004)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3004)
-
Richard Levitte authored
When using run() with capture => 1, there was no way to find out if the command was successful or not. This change adds a statusvar option, that must refer to a scalar variable, for example: my $status = undef; my @line = run(["whatever"], capture => 1, statusvar => \$status); $status will be 1 if the command "whatever" was successful, 0 otherwise. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3004)
-
David Benjamin authored
These two functions do the same thing. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3001)
-
Matt Caswell authored
Make sure we actually test resumption where an HRR has occurred. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2996)
-
Matt Caswell authored
Commit 6b1bb98f moved the processing of ClientHello extensions into the state machine post-processing stage. After processing s->init_num is reset to 0, so by post-processing we cannot rely on its value. Unfortunately we were using it to handle the PSK extension. This causes the handshake to fail. We were using init_num to figure out the length of ClientHello2 so we can remove it from the handshake_buffer. The handshake_buffer holds the transcript of all the messages sent so far. For PSK processing though we only want to add in a partial ClientHello2. This commit changes things so we just work out where ClientHello2 starts, working forward from the beginning of handshake_buffer. Fixes #2983 Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2996)
-
Richard Levitte authored
The code to do this incorrectly assumed that the protocol version could be used as a valid cipher suite for the 'openssl cipher' command. While this is true in some cases, that isn't something to be trusted. Replace that assumption with code that takes the full 'openssl ciphers' command output and parses it to find the ciphers we look for. Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2956)
-
- Mar 20, 2017
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
LONG and ZLONG items (which are OpenSSL private special cases of ASN1_INTEGER) are encoded into DER with padding if the leading octet has the high bit set, where the padding can be 0x00 (for positive numbers) or 0xff (for negative ones). When decoding DER to LONG or ZLONG, the padding wasn't taken in account at all, which means that if the encoded size with padding is one byte more than the size of long, decoding fails. This change fixes that issue. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3000)
-
Rich Salz authored
Also fix an error in UI_STRING (typo; wrong case). Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2999)
-
Richard Levitte authored
They both return 2 when the revoked entry that's found has the reason removeFromCRL. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2993)
-
Bernd Edlinger authored
Fix a strict aliasing issue in ui_dup_method_data. Add test coverage for CRYPTO_dup_ex_data, use OPENSSL_assert. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2988)
-
Richard Levitte authored
The internals tests for chacha, poly1305 and siphash were erroneously made conditional on if mdc2 was enabled. Corrected to depend on the correct algorithms being enabled instead. Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2991)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Add a test recipe (test/recipes/15-test_ecparams.t) which uses 'openssl ecparam' to check the test vectors. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2544)
-
Joseph Birr-Pixton authored
This involves: - A directory of valid and invalid PEM-encoded curves. This is non-exhaustive and can be added to. - A minor patch to 'openssl ecparam' to make it exit non-zero when curve validation fails. - A test recipe is added in a separate commit. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2544)
-
- Mar 19, 2017
-
-
Joseph Birr-Pixton authored
These were still generated by openssl, but with the previous commit are corroborated by rustls. (cherry picked from commit eae1982619e90c6b79a6ebc89603d81c13c81ce8) Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2989)
-
Joseph Birr-Pixton authored
This label for this derivation was incorrectly "derived" or "der" depending on the pointer size of the build(!). The correct string is "derived secret". (cherry picked from commit 936dcf272033c1bf59a5e859ec63e2557194f191) Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2989)
-
Kurt Roeckx authored
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> GH: #2633
-
Kurt Roeckx authored
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> GH: #2633
-
- Mar 18, 2017
-
-
Peter Wu authored
Add it in the options section, not the "Connected commands" section. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2977)
-
- Mar 17, 2017
-
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2918)
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2918)
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2918)
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2918)
-
Péter Budai authored
The documentation of this function states that the password parameter can be NULL. However, the implementation returns an error in this case due to the inner workings of the HMAC_Init_ex() function. With this change, NULL password will be treated as an empty string and PKCS5_PBKDF2_HMAC() no longer fails on this input. I have also added two new test cases that tests the handling of the special values NULL and -1 of the password and passlen parameters, respectively. Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1692)
-
Matt Caswell authored
Commits f2ff1432 in master and 14d4d7eda in 1.1.0 broke the no-dtls build by moving the position of a "#endif" for OPENSSL_NO_DTLS in a change which is otherwise unrelated to DTLS. This puts it back to where it was. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2974)
-
Matt Caswell authored
At one point the stack was passing a pointer of the element *before* an array which is undefined. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2971)
-
Pauli authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2965)
-
- Mar 16, 2017
-
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2969)
-