- 10 Jan, 1999 1 commit
-
-
Ben Laurie authored
-
- 09 Jan, 1999 2 commits
-
-
Ben Laurie authored
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
auto generated but not auto updated so it is included. Also remove the encryption from the sample DSA keys.
-
- 07 Jan, 1999 4 commits
-
-
Ben Laurie authored
-
Ben Laurie authored
Contributed by: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
-
Ben Laurie authored
-
Ben Laurie authored
Contributed by: Bodo Moeller <3moeller@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
-
- 06 Jan, 1999 4 commits
-
-
Ben Laurie authored
-
Ben Laurie authored
soon - I intend to do a lot of it!).
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
DSA_free(): this was causing crashes when for example an attempt was made to handle a (currently) unsupported DH public key. Also X509_PUBKEY_set()i wasn't checking errors from d2i_PublicKey().
-
- 04 Jan, 1999 4 commits
-
-
Ben Laurie authored
-
Ben Laurie authored
-
Ben Laurie authored
Submitted by: Arne Ansper <arne@ats.cyber.ee>
-
Ben Laurie authored
Submitted by: Arne Ansper <arne@ats.cyber.ee>
-
- 03 Jan, 1999 2 commits
-
-
Ralf S. Engelschall authored
in X509_STORE_new(), but document the fact that this variable is still unused in the certificate verification process.
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
handling to x509.c
-
- 02 Jan, 1999 3 commits
-
-
Ben Laurie authored
-
Ralf S. Engelschall authored
`openssl' and second, the shortcut symlinks for the `openssl <command>' are no longer created. This way we have a single and consistent command line interface `openssl <command>', similar to `cvs <command>'. Notice, the openssl.cnf, openssl.c and progs.pl files were changed after a repository copy, i.e. they still contain the complete file history.
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
zero unused bits.
-
- 01 Jan, 1999 3 commits
-
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
-
Paul C. Sutton authored
-
Paul C. Sutton authored
(including if user presses ^C)
-
- 31 Dec, 1998 3 commits
-
-
Ben Laurie authored
-
Ralf S. Engelschall authored
1. The already released version was 0.9.1c and not 0.9.1b 2. The next release should be 0.9.2 and not 0.9.1d, because first the changes are already too large, second we should avoid any more 0.9.1x confusions and third, the Apache version semantics of VERSION.REVISION.PATCHLEVEL for the version string is reasonable (and here .2 is already just a patchlevel and not major change). tVS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
stephen authored
-
- 30 Dec, 1998 2 commits
-
-
Ralf S. Engelschall authored
-
Ralf S. Engelschall authored
-
- 29 Dec, 1998 2 commits
-
-
Ben Laurie authored
-
Ben Laurie authored
-
- 28 Dec, 1998 4 commits
-
-
Ben Laurie authored
-
Ben Laurie authored
-
Ben Laurie authored
-
Ben Laurie authored
-
- 26 Dec, 1998 1 commit
-
-
Ralf S. Engelschall authored
-
- 23 Dec, 1998 5 commits
-
-
Ralf S. Engelschall authored
-
Ralf S. Engelschall authored
-
Ralf S. Engelschall authored
-
Ralf S. Engelschall authored
-
Ralf S. Engelschall authored
-