- 08 Jan, 2018 8 commits
-
-
EasySec authored
Reviewed-by:
Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by:
Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> Reviewed-by:
Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5000)
-
pass86 authored
CLA: trivial Reviewed-by:
Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5029)
-
Noah Robbin authored
Extract the RSA key using EVP_PKEY_get0. Type is checked externally to be either EVP_PKEY_RSA_PSS or EVP_PKEY_RSA. Reviewed-by:
-
Noah Robbin authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Dmitry Belyavskiy authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Dr. Matthias St. Pierre authored
usage: openssl-update-copyright [-h|--help] [file|directory] ... Updates the year ranges of all OpenSSL copyright statements in the given files or directories. (Directories are traversed recursively.) Only copyright statements containing the string 'The OpenSSL Project' are affected. The copyright time range is adjusted to include the current year. If only a single year was specified, it is replaced by a time range starting at that year and ending at the current year. All '(c)' and '(C)' signs are preserved. Signed-off-by:
Dr. Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Richard Levitte authored
So far, we've placed all extra library related flags together, ending up in the make variable EX_LIBS. This turns out to be problematic, as for example, some compilers don't quite agree with something like this: cc -o foo foo.o -L/whatever -lsomething They prefer this: cc -L/whatever -o foo foo.o -lsomething IBM's compiler on OS/390 is such a compiler that we know of, and we have previously handled that as a previous case. The answer here is to make a more general solution, where linking options are divided in two parts, where one ends up in LDFLAGS and the other in EX_LIBS (they corresponds to what is called LDFLAGS and LDLIBS in the GNU world) Reviewed-by: -
Richard Levitte authored
The uClinux targets included some attributes that would result in circular references of CFLAGS and LDCLAGS. Reviewed-by:
Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5034)
-
- 07 Jan, 2018 12 commits
-
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by:
Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5030)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Patrick Steuer authored
Signed-off-by:
Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by:
Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4634)
-
Patrick Steuer authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Patrick Steuer authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Andy Polyakov authored
SPARC ISA doesn't have provisions to back up 128-bit multiplications and additions. And so multiplications are done with library calls and carries with comparisons and conditional moves. As result base 2^51 code is >40% slower... Reviewed-by: -
Andy Polyakov authored
[and improve formatting] Reviewed-by:
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Andy Polyakov authored
This is based on RT#3810, which added dedicated modular inversion. ECDSA verify results improves as well, but not as much. Reviewed-by:
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by:
-
- 06 Jan, 2018 5 commits
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Konstantin Shemyak authored
Fixes #4996. Reviewed-by:
-
Bernd Edlinger authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Bernd Edlinger authored
Add comments to no longer usable ciphers. Reviewed-by:
-
- 05 Jan, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Viktor Dukhovni authored
Reviewed-by:
-
- 04 Jan, 2018 5 commits
-
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Dr. Matthias St. Pierre authored
The changes are analogous to the ones made in commit 0bf340e1 to x509.pod, see PR #4924. Reviewed-by:
-
Dr. Matthias St. Pierre authored
The DRGB concept described in NIST SP 800-90A provides for having different algorithms to generate random output. In fact, the FIPS object module used to implement three of them, CTR DRBG, HASH DRBG and HMAC DRBG. When the FIPS code was ported to master in #4019, two of the three algorithms were dropped, and together with those the entire code that made RAND_DRBG generic was removed, since only one concrete implementation was left. This commit restores the original generic implementation of the DRBG, making it possible again to add additional implementations using different algorithms (like RAND_DRBG_CHACHA20) in the future. Reviewed-by:
Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Dr. Matthias St. Pierre authored
The generic part of the FIPS DRBG was implemented in fips_drbg_lib.c and the algorithm specific parts in fips_drbg_<alg>.c for <alg> in {ctr, hash, hmac}. Additionally, there was the module fips_drbg_rand.c which contained 'gluing' code between the RAND_METHOD api and the FIPS DRBG. When the FIPS code was ported to master in #4019, for some reason the ctr-drbg implementation from fips_drbg_ctr.c ended up in drbg_rand.c instead of drbg_ctr.c. This commit renames the module drbg_rand.c back to drbg_ctr.c, thereby restoring a simple relationship between the original fips modules and the drbg modules in master: fips_drbg_lib.c => drbg_lib.c /* generic part of implementation */ fips_drbg_<alg>.c => drbg_<alg>.c /* algorithm specific implementations */ Reviewed-by:
-
- 03 Jan, 2018 2 commits
-
-
Benjamin Kaduk authored
Add a regression test for the functionality enabled in the previous commit. [extended tests] Reviewed-by:
-
Benjamin Kaduk authored
Although this is forbidden by all three(!) relevant specifications, there seem to be multiple server implementations in the wild that send it. Since we didn't check for unexpected extensions in any given message type until TLS 1.3 support was added, our previous behavior was to silently accept these extensions and pass them over to the custom extension callback (if any). In order to avoid regression of functionality, relax the check for "extension in unexpected context" for this specific case, but leave the protocol enforcment mechanism unchanged for other extensions and in other extension contexts. Leave a detailed comment to indicate what is going on. Reviewed-by:
-
- 02 Jan, 2018 2 commits
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
A TLSv1.3 Certificate Request message was issuing a "Message length parse error" using the -trace option to s_server/s_client. Reviewed-by:
-
Daniel Bevenius authored
Similar to commit 17b60280 ( "Remove extra `the` in SSL_SESSION_set1_id.pod"), this commit removes typos where additional 'the' have been added. Reviewed-by:
-
- 28 Dec, 2017 5 commits
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Following the changes that removed Makefile.shared, we also changed the generation of .def / .map / .opt files from ordinals more explicit, removing the need to the "magic" ORDINALS declaration. Reviewed-by:
-
Andy Polyakov authored
"Double" is in quotes because improvement coefficient varies significantly depending on platform and compiler. You're likely to measure ~2x improvement on popular desktop and server processors, but not so much on mobile ones, even minor regression on ARM Cortex series. Latter is because they have rather "weak" umulh instruction. On low-end x86_64 problem is that contemporary gcc and clang tend to opt for double-precision shift for >>51, which can be devastatingly slow on some processors. Just in case for reference, trick is to use 2^51 radix [currently only for DH]. Reviewed-by: -
Matt Caswell authored
Now that we attempt to send early data in the first TCP packet along with the ClientHello, the documentation for SSL_write_early_data() needed a tweak. Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
We don't keep track of the number of bytes written between in the SSL_write_ex() call and the subsequent flush. If the flush needs to be retried then we will have forgotten how many bytes actually got written. The simplest solution is to just disable it for this scenario. Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
We'd like the first bit of early_data and the ClientHello to go in the same TCP packet if at all possible to enable things like TCP Fast Open. Also, if you're only going to send one block of early data then you also don't need to worry about TCP_NODELAY. Fixes #4783 Reviewed-by:
-
