This is part of a large change submitted by Markus Friedl <markus@openbsd.org>

Check if IDEA is being built or not.
This is part of a large change submitted by Markus Friedl <markus@openbsd.org>

This is part of a large change submitted by Markus Friedl <markus@openbsd.org>

specially if it is.
Add a few OpenBSD-specific cases.
This is part of a large change submitted by Markus Friedl <markus@openbsd.org>

This is part of a large change submitted by Markus Friedl <markus@openbsd.org>

This is part of a large change submitted by Markus Friedl <markus@openbsd.org>

This is part of a large change submitted by Markus Friedl <markus@openbsd.org>

Use BUF_strlcat() instead of strcat().
Use BIO_snprintf() instead of sprintf().
In some cases, keep better track of buffer lengths.
This is part of a large change submitted by Markus Friedl <markus@openbsd.org>

This is part of a large change submitted by Markus Friedl <markus@openbsd.org>

not the size of the integer used to index in said buffer.

PR: 794
Notified by: Rhett Garber <rhett_garber@hp.com>

Correct the typo PUKEY...

Correct the typo PUKEY...

Submitted by: Nils Larsch

Submitted by: Nils Larsch

Submitted by: Nils Larsch

Submitted by: Witold Filipczyk <witekfl@poczta.gazeta.pl>

PR: #513

- Add missing bn_check_top() calls and relocate some others
- Use BN_is_zero() where appropriate
- Remove assert()s that bn_check_top() is already covering
- Simplify the code in places (esp. bn_expand2())
- Only keep ambiguous zero handling if BN_STRICT isn't defined
- Remove some white-space and make some other aesthetic tweaks

the same thing.

Also, I have some stuff on the back-burner related to some BN_CTX notes
from Peter Gutmann about his cryptlib hacks to the bignum code. The BN_CTX
comments are there to remind me of some relevant points in the code.

once in the source (where it is set for the benefit of no other code
whatsoever). I've deprecated the declaration in the header and likewise
made the use of the flag conditional in bn_lib.c. Note, this change also
NULLs the 'd' pointer in a BIGNUM when it is reset but not deallocated.

white-space, and include extra headers to satisfy debugging builds.

white-space.

which, in turn, are used nowhere at all. This is a good thing because
bn_set_max() would currently generate code that wouldn't compile (BIGNUM
has no 'max' element).

The only apparent use for bn_set_[low|high] would be for implementing
windowing algorithms, and all of openssl's seem to use bn_***_words()
helpers instead (including the BN_div() that Nils fixed recently, which had
been using independently-coded versions of what these unused macros are
intended for). I'm therefore consigning these macros to cvs oblivion in the
name of readability.

bn_correct_top() or bn_check_top() depending on debug settings. For
internal source, all bn_fix_top()s should be converted one way or the other
depending on whether the use of bn_correct_top() is justified.

For BN_div_recp(), these cases should not require correction if the other
bignum functions are doing their jobs properly, so convert to
bn_check_top().

ty to allocate anything at all.  This will allow eNULL to still work.

PR: 751
Notified by: Lutz Jaenicke

PR: 751
Notified by: meder@mcs.anl.gov
Reviewed by: Lutz Jaenicke, Richard Levitte

if the give size is 0.

This is a thought that came up in PR 751.

PR: #735
Submitted by: Tim Rice <tim@multitalents.net>

this and a few other changes.

(ie. where top may be zero, or it may be one if the corresponding word is
set to zero). Note, this only affects the macros in bn.h, there are probably
similar corrections required in some c files.

Also, clarify the audit-related macros at the top of the header. Mental
note: I must not forget to clean all this out before 0.9.8 is released ...

tolerance of ambiguous zero-representation, it just improves
BN_abs_is_word() and simplifies other macros that depend on it.

pseudo-random data for each bn_pollute().

functions.

PR: 755
Notified by: Jakub Bogusz <qboosh@pld-linux.org>

Therefore, change all instances of the symbol 'list' to something else.

PR: 758
Submitted by: Frédéric Giudicelli <groups@newpki.org>

PR: 768
Submitted by: Vadim Fedukovich <vf@unity.net>

that gets built before objects barfs all over the place because it
uses a new NID that hasn't had a chance of getting defined yet (in
this case, it was about a couple of new EC curves, and therefore a
couple of new corresponding NIDs).

I'm placing objects first in SDIRS!  There.

compared it to the amount of bits required...
PR: 770
Submitted by: c zhang <czhang2005@hotmail.com>