bug #1326306

  #1334338 (http://curl.haxx.se/bug/view.cgi?id=1334338). When reading an SSL
  stream from a server and the server requests a "rehandshake", the current
  code simply returns this as an error. I have no good way to test this, but
  I've added a crude attempt of dealing with this situation slightly better -
  it makes a blocking handshake if this happens. Done like this because fixing
  this the "proper" way (that would handshake asynchronously) will require
  quite some work and I really need a good way to test this to do such a
  change.

it, it could then accidentally actually crash. Presumably, this concerns FTP
connections.  http://curl.haxx.se/bug/view.cgi?id=1330310

linked to the executable and not to the libcurld.lib
http://curl.haxx.se/bug/view.cgi?id=1326676

CURLE_COULDNT_RESOLVE_PROXY and CURLE_COULDNT_RESOLVE_HOST on resolving
errors (as documented).

(wrongly) sends *two* WWW-Authenticate headers for Digest. While this should
never happen in a sane world, libcurl previously got into an infinite loop
when this occurred. Dave added test 273 to verify this.

DEBUG_ADDRINFO to enable.

you set rtlibcfg=static for the make, then it would build with /MT. The
default behaviour is /MD (the original)."
http://curl.haxx.se/bug/view.cgi?id=1326665

when building the static library. http://curl.haxx.se/bug/view.cgi?id=1326665

copy them there.

was 0 as it seems at least some AIX versions don't like a "0" string there

modded since the given time, so we should compare <= and not just <.

the MEST and CEST time zones.

will break strict-aliasing rules".

runtime libs.

now contain the word "proxy" is the hostname is in fact a proxy. This will
help users detect situations when they mistakenly use a proxy.

(http://curl.haxx.se/bug/view.cgi?id=1299181) that identified a silly problem
with Content-Range: headers with the 'bytes' keyword written in a different
case than all lowercase! It would cause a segfault!

the modified FTPS negotiation change of August 19 2005. Thus, we revert the
change back to pre-7.14.1 status.

define SEC_ENTRY and thus fails unless this is done!

protocol sockets even if the resolved address may say otherwise

Should we do this for all targets?

have this check done on far too many places by now...

added. TODO: add them to docs. add TFTP server to test suite. add TFTP to
list of protocols whereever those are mentioned.

Kevin Lussier pointed this out!

for Windows, that could lead to an Access Violation when the multi interface
was used due to an issue with how the resolver thread was and was not
terminated.