Skip to content
  1. Nov 10, 2005
  2. Nov 09, 2005
  3. Nov 08, 2005
  4. Nov 07, 2005
  5. Nov 05, 2005
  6. Nov 02, 2005
    • Daniel Stenberg's avatar
      oops · f5e85bab
      Daniel Stenberg authored
      f5e85bab
    • Daniel Stenberg's avatar
      Added: · 9a44fa83
      Daniel Stenberg authored
       1.9 Where do I buy commercial support for curl?
       1.10 How many are using curl?
       6.7 What are my obligations when using libcurl in my commerical apps?
      
      Edited a few other paragraphs slightly.
      9a44fa83
  7. Nov 01, 2005
  8. Oct 31, 2005
    • Daniel Stenberg's avatar
      Vilmos Nebehaj improved libcurl's LDAP abilities: · b91421b1
      Daniel Stenberg authored
      The LDAP code in libcurl can't handle LDAP servers of LDAPv3 nor binary
      attributes in LDAP objects. So, I made a quick patch to address these
      problems.
      
      The solution is simple: if we connect to an LDAP server, first try LDAPv3
      (which is the preferred protocol as of now) and then fall back to LDAPv2.
      In case of binary attributes, we first convert them to base64, just like the
      openldap client does. It uses ldap_get_values_len() instead of
      ldap_get_values() to be able to retrieve binary attributes correctly. I
      defined the necessary LDAP macros in lib/ldap.c to be able to compile
      libcurl without the presence of libldap
      b91421b1
    • Daniel Stenberg's avatar
      kill trailing whitespace · 43b3954f
      Daniel Stenberg authored
      43b3954f
  9. Oct 30, 2005
  10. Oct 29, 2005
  11. Oct 28, 2005
  12. Oct 27, 2005
  13. Oct 25, 2005
  14. Oct 22, 2005
    • Daniel Stenberg's avatar
      Dima Barsky reported a problem with GnuTLS-enabled libcurl in bug report · c890149c
      Daniel Stenberg authored
        #1334338 (http://curl.haxx.se/bug/view.cgi?id=1334338). When reading an SSL
        stream from a server and the server requests a "rehandshake", the current
        code simply returns this as an error. I have no good way to test this, but
        I've added a crude attempt of dealing with this situation slightly better -
        it makes a blocking handshake if this happens. Done like this because fixing
        this the "proper" way (that would handshake asynchronously) will require
        quite some work and I really need a good way to test this to do such a
        change.
      c890149c
  15. Oct 21, 2005