- Nov 04, 2016
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Also document SSL_peek() which was missing from the docs. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Also implement the using of them Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Previously they return -1 for failure or the size of the mac. But the size was never used anywhere. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
And use them in the DTLS code Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
We also modify the SSL_get_error() function to handle the fact that with SSL_write_ex() the error return is 0 not -1, and fix some bugs in the SSL BIO reading. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Writing still to be done Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
As per permission from Google (Emilia). Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
The updated shim has the ability to skip tests using unimplemented flags. This should reduce the number of test failures. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Move from two ifs to a single one with an && Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
It was only a sanity check anyway, so isn't needed Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
It is no longer used (replaced with bssl:UniquePtr) Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
That way we can remove flags that we don't support Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
We will rely on the -allow-unimplemented feature instead. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
They were there for BoringSSL only features which are not relevant to us. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
It was just a sanity check and isn't needed Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-