ETSI's Bug Tracker |
Anonymous | Login | Signup for local Mantis account | 05-05-2024 15:05 IST |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Monitor project |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
0007322 | SECURITY | TSS&TP | public | 14-01-2016 10:42 | 28-01-2016 23:08 | ||||
Reporter | haddads | ||||||||
Assigned To | Denis Filatov | ||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried | ||||
Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||||||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||
Product Version | |||||||||
Target Version | Next Version | Fixed in Version | |||||||
Summary | 0007322: [TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CERT_08_03_BO] Use of "and" | ||||||||
Description | containing certificate (CERT_TS_08_03_BO_AT) { not containing validity_restrictions['region'] containing signer_info.digest referencing to a CERT_TS_D_AA } -> containing certificate (CERT_TS_08_03_BO_AT) { not containing validity_restrictions['region'] "and" containing signer_info.digest referencing to a CERT_TS_D_AA } They are on the same level so maybe we should add an "and" ? That is done in other tests. This should be harmonized (e.g. TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_05_02_BO). In a general way the use of the word "and" doesn't seem clear in the different tests. | ||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||
Notes | |
(0013783) Denis Filatov (administrator) 28-01-2016 23:08 |
done wherever it possible |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
14-01-2016 10:42 | haddads | New Issue | |
14-01-2016 10:42 | haddads | Status | new => assigned |
14-01-2016 10:42 | haddads | Assigned To | => Denis Filatov |
28-01-2016 23:08 | Denis Filatov | Note Added: 0013783 | |
28-01-2016 23:08 | Denis Filatov | Status | assigned => resolved |
28-01-2016 23:08 | Denis Filatov | Resolution | open => fixed |
MantisBT 1.2.14 [^] Copyright © 2000 - 2024 MantisBT Team |