ETSI's Bug Tracker - SECURITY | |||||
View Issue Details | |||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
0007322 | SECURITY | TSS&TP | public | 14-01-2016 10:42 | 28-01-2016 23:08 |
Reporter | haddads | ||||
Assigned To | Denis Filatov | ||||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||
Product Version | |||||
Target Version | Next Version | Fixed in Version | |||
Summary | 0007322: [TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CERT_08_03_BO] Use of "and" | ||||
Description | containing certificate (CERT_TS_08_03_BO_AT) { not containing validity_restrictions['region'] containing signer_info.digest referencing to a CERT_TS_D_AA } -> containing certificate (CERT_TS_08_03_BO_AT) { not containing validity_restrictions['region'] "and" containing signer_info.digest referencing to a CERT_TS_D_AA } They are on the same level so maybe we should add an "and" ? That is done in other tests. This should be harmonized (e.g. TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_05_02_BO). In a general way the use of the word "and" doesn't seem clear in the different tests. | ||||
Steps To Reproduce | |||||
Additional Information | |||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Relationships | |||||
Attached Files | |||||
Issue History | |||||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change | ||
14-01-2016 10:42 | haddads | New Issue | |||
14-01-2016 10:42 | haddads | Status | new => assigned | ||
14-01-2016 10:42 | haddads | Assigned To | => Denis Filatov | ||
28-01-2016 23:08 | Denis Filatov | Note Added: 0013783 | |||
28-01-2016 23:08 | Denis Filatov | Status | assigned => resolved | ||
28-01-2016 23:08 | Denis Filatov | Resolution | open => fixed |
Notes | |||||
|
|||||
|
|