| |
ETSI's Bug Tracker |
| Anonymous | Login | Signup for local Mantis account | 02-05-2024 23:58 IST |  |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Monitor project |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
| 0005610 | CAM | TSS&TP | public | 14-07-2010 16:13 | 23-08-2010 13:49 | ||||
| Reporter | Francois FISCHER (FSCOM) | ||||||||
| Assigned To | user67 | ||||||||
| Priority | high | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always | ||||
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||||||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||
| Product Version | |||||||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | Next Release | |||||||
| Summary | 0005610: OTV TPs | ||||||||
| Description | MAny Optional TaggedValue parameter are not objectively related to a possible "signal". For instance occupancy. Furthermore, the base standard does not specify the usage of these optional values. Having defined PICS for these optional values, we might only and simply check that when the PICS indicates these optional are supported, the corresponding TaggedValue is then sent in the CAM message. Note the absence of the TaggedValue shall not be checked, this would corresponds to checking the PICS (ie. when the PICS is set to "false", we shall not check that the TaggedValue is not included. Being optional, it can be included!) Thus I would like the corresponding TPS to be rewritten, and as applicable removed. | ||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||||
 Relationships |
|
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
|
(0009534) Francois FISCHER (FSCOM) (developer) 16-07-2010 11:21 |
FFI-JCW: looks like if PICS is true then we check for presence of the TaggedValue. Need to check if any other requirement leads to include or not the TaggedValue. |
|
(0009555) Sebastian Muellers (administrator) 22-07-2010 09:30 edited on: 22-07-2010 15:30 |
It seems correct to NOT check the absence of the TaggedValue. Make the necessary changes (= delete them). For the completion, I'd like to mention that after clarification with Miro, the absence of the SITUATIONAL tagged values shall be checked. as this is already done now changes needed. |
|
(0009572) user67 26-07-2010 17:20 |
TP for absence of tagged value deleted. Other TP modified taken into account the values inside the optionnal tagged IE. |
|
(0009628) Sebastian Muellers (administrator) 23-08-2010 13:49 |
resolved in meeting 20100823 |
|
Notes |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 14-07-2010 16:13 | Francois FISCHER (FSCOM) | New Issue | |
| 15-07-2010 15:42 | Sebastian Muellers | Status | new => assigned |
| 15-07-2010 15:42 | Sebastian Muellers | Assigned To | => user67 |
| 16-07-2010 11:21 | Francois FISCHER (FSCOM) | Note Added: 0009534 | |
| 16-07-2010 11:21 | Francois FISCHER (FSCOM) | Status | assigned => acknowledged |
| 22-07-2010 09:30 | Sebastian Muellers | Note Added: 0009555 | |
| 22-07-2010 15:30 | Sebastian Muellers | Note Edited: 0009555 | |
| 26-07-2010 17:20 | user67 | Status | acknowledged => resolved |
| 26-07-2010 17:20 | user67 | Fixed in Version | => Next Release |
| 26-07-2010 17:20 | user67 | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 26-07-2010 17:20 | user67 | Note Added: 0009572 | |
| 23-08-2010 13:49 | Sebastian Muellers | Status | resolved => closed |
| 23-08-2010 13:49 | Sebastian Muellers | Note Added: 0009628 | |
|
Issue History |
| MantisBT 1.2.14 [^] Copyright © 2000 - 2024 MantisBT Team |
 |