Skip to content
  1. Sep 21, 1999
  2. Sep 20, 1999
  3. Sep 19, 1999
  4. Sep 18, 1999
  5. Sep 17, 1999
  6. Sep 15, 1999
  7. Sep 14, 1999
  8. Sep 13, 1999
  9. Sep 11, 1999
    • Andy Polyakov's avatar
      Initial support for MacOS. · 17f389bb
      Andy Polyakov authored
      This will soon be complemented with MacOS specific source code files and
      INSTALL.MacOS.
      
      I (Andy) have decided to get rid of a number of #include <sys/types.h>.
      I've verified it's ok (both by examining /usr/include/*.h and compiling)
      on a number of Unix platforms. Unfortunately I don't have Windows box
      to verify this on. I really appreciate if somebody could try to compile
      it and contact me a.s.a.p. in case a problem occurs.
      
      Submitted by: Roy Wood <roy@centricsystems.ca>
      Reviewed by: Andy Polyakov <appro@fy.chalmers.se>
      17f389bb
    • Bodo Möller's avatar
      5bdae167
  10. Sep 10, 1999
  11. Sep 09, 1999
  12. Sep 08, 1999
  13. Sep 07, 1999
  14. Sep 06, 1999
  15. Sep 05, 1999
    • Bodo Möller's avatar
      Reinitialize conf to NULL whenver ca application is started. · a32640b0
      Bodo Möller authored
      Submitted by: Lennart Bang
      a32640b0
    • Andy Polyakov's avatar
      SHA clean-up Intel assembler companion. · 69fb1c3f
      Andy Polyakov authored
      I've chosen to nest two functions in order to save about 4K. As a result
      s1-win32.asm doesn't look right (nested PROC/ENDP SEGMENT/ENDS) and it's
      probably impossible to compile. I assume I have to reconsider... But not
      today...
      69fb1c3f
    • Andy Polyakov's avatar
      SHA clean-up and (LP64) tune-up. · 7f7c318c
      Andy Polyakov authored
      "Clean-up" stands for the fact that it's using common message digest
      template ../md32_common.h and sha[1_]dgst.c are reduced down to
      '#define SHA_[01]' and then '#include "sha_locl.h"'. It stands "(LP64)"
      there because it's 64 bit platforms which benefit most from the tune-up.
      The updated code exhibits 40% performance improvement on IRIX64
      (sounds too good, huh? I probably should double check if it's not
      some cache trashing that was holding it back before), 28% - on
      Alpha Linux and 12% - Solaris 7/64.
      7f7c318c
  16. Sep 04, 1999