the one to be used to denote local labels in single function scope.
Problem is that SHA uses same label set across functions, therefore I
have to switch back to $ prefix.

'OpenSSL_0_9_7-stable'.

warnings.

Reported by: Bernhard Simon.

shared libraries shared.

shared libraries shared.

callbacks

callbacks

BIO_s_bio.pod.  The most logical is to move everything needed from
BIO_new_bio_pair.pod to BIO_s_bio.pod (including the nice example)
and toss BIO_new_bio_pair.pod.  I hope I got all the info over properly.
PR: 370

BIO_s_bio.pod.  The most logical is to move everything needed from
BIO_new_bio_pair.pod to BIO_s_bio.pod (including the nice example)
and toss BIO_new_bio_pair.pod.  I hope I got all the info over properly.
PR: 370

since it's both enumerated and explained in BIO_s_connect.pod.
PR: 370

since it's both enumerated and explained in BIO_s_connect.pod.
PR: 370

PR: 353

PR: 353

that wants to use the hw_ncipher engine without having given any
callbacks for the dynamic type of locks.

engine work properly even in bad situations.

configured with zlib support).

callbacks) before attempting to lock.

callbacks) before attempting to lock.

pushed item.  The index is the number of items - 1.  And if a NULL item was
found, actually use it.
Finally, provide a little bit of safety in CRYPTO_lock() by asserting the a
requested dynamic lock really must exist, instead of just being silent about it

pushed item.  The index is the number of items - 1.  And if a NULL item was
found, actually use it.
Finally, provide a little bit of safety in CRYPTO_lock() by asserting the a
requested dynamic lock really must exist, instead of just being silent about it

were defined.

were defined.

were defined.

were defined.

(before SSLeay, maybe?), it's better to have that macro protect
the compatibility header des_old.h.  In the new des.h, let's use
a slightly different protecting macro.

The rationale is that there are application that might include (via
other header files, perhaps) both an old libdes des.h and OpenSSL's
des.h.  Whichever comes first would overshadow the other because of
the clash in protecting macro.  This fix solves that problem.

(before SSLeay, maybe?), it's better to have that macro protect
the compatibility header des_old.h.  In the new des.h, let's use
a slightly different protecting macro.

The rationale is that there are application that might include (via
other header files, perhaps) both an old libdes des.h and OpenSSL's
des.h.  Whichever comes first would overshadow the other because of
the clash in protecting macro.  This fix solves that problem.

(Noticed by Nils Larsch)

Submitted by: Bernhard Simon <simon@zid.tuwien.ac.at>
Reviewed by:
PR:

Submitted by: Bernhard Simon <simon@zid.tuwien.ac.at>
Reviewed by:
PR: