Fix typos in PKCS#12 ASN1 code.

Make PKCS7_set_detached work again.

Submitted by: TJ Saunders <tj@castaglia.org>
Reviewed by:
PR: 268

Apply -nameopt patches to 0.9.7

Submitted by: anonymous
PR: 254

which was effectively bypassed in the ASN1 changed.

GNU ld comes first, checking the usage of collect2 gives that instead of
GNU ld, even if GNU ld would be the one that would get used if we link using
gcc.  It's much better, apparently, to ask gcc directly what the path to
GNU ld is (provided it's there at all and gcc knows about it), and ask
the result if it's a GNU or not.  The bonus is that our GNU ld detection
mechanism got shorter and easier to understand...

Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
PR: 212

Submitted by: Mike Castle <dalgoda@ix.netcom.com>
Reviewed by:
PR: 200

come up with all kinds of names we don't have in our targets).
Besides, our sparcv9 targets currently generate sparcv8 code, I'm told.

Notified by Doug Kaufman <dkaufman@rahul.net>

Fix block_size field for CFB and OFB modes: it should be 1.

PR: 220

Submitted by: Lorinczy Zsigmond <lzsiga@mail.ahiv.hu>

Part of PR 196

PR: 199

OpenSSL itself, since they aren't used there (yet).  It became quite
visible qhen building a shared library, however...

become rather large.  This becomes a problem when the default 1024
character large buffer that WRITE uses isn't enough.  WRITE/SYMBOL
uses a 2048 byte large buffer instead.

needed, call 'pod2man' directly if this works

PR: 217

That will make the test go through even if DH (or in some cases ECDH) aren't
built into OpenSSL.
PR: 216, part 2

typical output from a program in C.
PR: 222

Fix typo in OBJ_txt2obj which incorrectly passed the content
length, instead of the encoding length to d2i_ASN1_OBJECT.

This wasn't visible before becuse ASN1_get_object() used
to read past the length of the supplied buffer.

'OpenSSL_0_9_7-stable'.

contributed TO WORK WITH 0.9.7 can be built as dynamically loadable
libraries.

For now, they're not included in crypto/engine/ since 0.9.7 is in
feature freeze.  Further discussion might change that, but don't hold
your breath.

here).

PR: 216, point 1