introduced for a reason [like bug in initial gcc port], but proposed
=&r is treated correctly by senior 3.2, so we can assume it's safe now.
PR: 1031

PR: 860

PR: 658

OpenSSL distributions, or are about to.  This has been requested a
little now and then by users, for years :-/...

which cannot be evaluated in an if statement

client random values.

handle that properly.

Submitted by: Jean-Luc Duval
Reviewed by:  Nils Larsch

disabled by default (MDC2 and RC5), which until now were skipped
by "make links" and yet supposedly required by some of the Makefiles,
meaning that the recent snapshots failed to compile.

Problem reported by Nils Larsch.

from it which algorithms were disabled.  With these new changes,
"make depend" will properly take into account algorithms that are skipped.