Skip to content
  1. Feb 07, 2018
  2. Jan 29, 2018
  3. Jan 28, 2018
  4. Jan 23, 2018
  5. Jan 07, 2018
  6. Jan 02, 2018
  7. Dec 12, 2017
  8. Dec 07, 2017
  9. Dec 06, 2017
  10. Nov 21, 2017
    • Paul Yang's avatar
      Support multi-prime RSA (RFC 8017) · 665d899f
      Paul Yang authored
      
      
      * Introduce RSA_generate_multi_prime_key to generate multi-prime
        RSA private key. As well as the following functions:
          RSA_get_multi_prime_extra_count
          RSA_get0_multi_prime_factors
          RSA_get0_multi_prime_crt_params
          RSA_set0_multi_prime_params
          RSA_get_version
      * Support EVP operations for multi-prime RSA
      * Support ASN.1 operations for multi-prime RSA
      * Support multi-prime check in RSA_check_key_ex
      * Support multi-prime RSA in apps/genrsa and apps/speed
      * Support multi-prime RSA manipulation functions
      * Test cases and documentation are added
      * CHANGES is updated
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarBernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
      (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4241)
      665d899f
  11. Nov 12, 2017
  12. Nov 05, 2017
  13. Nov 02, 2017
  14. Oct 31, 2017
  15. Oct 25, 2017
  16. Oct 07, 2017
  17. Aug 30, 2017
  18. Aug 27, 2017
  19. Aug 15, 2017
  20. Aug 07, 2017
  21. Jul 25, 2017
  22. Jul 03, 2017
  23. Jun 29, 2017
  24. Jun 28, 2017
  25. Jun 27, 2017
    • Richard Levitte's avatar
      util/mkerr.pl: allow module names prefixed with OSSL_ or OPENSSL_ · 4b2799c1
      Richard Levitte authored
      
      
      To make sure that our symbols don't clash with other libraries, we
      claim the namespaces OSSL and OPENSSL.  Because C doesn't provide
      namespaces, the only solution is to have them as prefixes on symbols,
      thus we allow OSSL_ and OPENSSL_ as prefixes.
      
      These namespace prefixes are optional for the foreseeable future, and
      will only be used for new modules as needed on a case by case basis,
      until further notice.
      
      For extra safety, there's an added requirement that module names -
      apart from the namespace prefix - be at least 2 characters long.
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
      (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3781)
      4b2799c1
  26. Jun 19, 2017
  27. Jun 16, 2017
  28. Jun 08, 2017
  29. Jun 02, 2017
  30. May 31, 2017
  31. May 25, 2017
  32. May 17, 2017
    • Matt Caswell's avatar
      Don't allow fragmented alerts · bd990e25
      Matt Caswell authored
      
      
      An alert message is 2 bytes long. In theory it is permissible in SSLv3 -
      TLSv1.2 to fragment such alerts across multiple records (some of which
      could be empty). In practice it make no sense to send an empty alert
      record, or to fragment one. TLSv1.3 prohibts this altogether and other
      libraries (BoringSSL, NSS) do not support this at all. Supporting it adds
      significant complexity to the record layer, and its removal is unlikely
      to cause inter-operability issues.
      
      The DTLS code for this never worked anyway and it is not supported at a
      protocol level for DTLS. Similarly fragmented DTLS handshake records only
      work at a protocol level where at least the handshake message header
      exists within the record. DTLS code existed for trying to handle fragmented
      handshake records smaller than this size. This code didn't work either so
      has also been removed.
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
      (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3476)
      bd990e25
  33. Apr 27, 2017
  34. Apr 20, 2017
  35. Apr 10, 2017
  36. Apr 07, 2017
  37. Mar 30, 2017
  38. Mar 29, 2017