- Aug 22, 2016
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
The mem pointed to by cAB can be leaked on an error path. Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
The mem pointed to by tmp can be leaked on an error path. Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Sometimes it is called with a NULL pointer Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Don't leak pke_ctx on error. Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
Kurt Roeckx authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> GH: #1472
-
FdaSilvaYY authored
Signed-off-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> GH: #1471
-
Matt Caswell authored
The PKCS12 command line utility is not available if no-des is used. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Also, re-organize RSA check to use goto err. Add a test case. Try all checks, not just stopping at first (via Richard Levitte) Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Kazuki Yamaguchi authored
The variable 'buffer', allocated by EC_POINT_point2buf(), isn't free'd on the success path. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
Kazuki Yamaguchi authored
Declare EC{PK,}PARAMETERS_{new,free} functions in public headers. The free functions are necessary because EC_GROUP_get_ec{pk,}parameters() was made public by commit 60b350a3 ("RT3676: Expose ECgroup i2d functions"). Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
FdaSilvaYY authored
Code was relying on an implicit data-sharing through duplication of loopargs_t pointer-members made by ASYNC_start_job(). Now share structure address instead of structure content. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
The following would fail, or rather, freeze: openssl genrsa -out rsa2048.pem 2048 openssl req -x509 -key rsa2048.pem -keyform PEM -out cert.pem In that case, the second command wants to read a certificate request from stdin, because -x509 wasn't fully flagged as being for creating something new. This changes makes it fully flagged. RT#4655 Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Original strategy for page-walking was adjust stack pointer and then touch pages in order. This kind of asks for double-fault, because if touch fails, then signal will be delivered to frame above adjusted stack pointer. But touching pages prior adjusting stack pointer would upset valgrind. As compromise let's adjust stack pointer in pages, touching top of the stack. This still asks for double-fault, but at least prevents corruption of neighbour stack if allocation is to overstep the guard page. Also omit predict-non-taken hints as they reportedly trigger illegal instructions in some VM setups. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
The previous ciphersuite broke in no-ec builds. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Kazuki Yamaguchi authored
Fix an off by one error in the overflow check added by 07bed46f ("Check for errors in BN_bn2dec()"). Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
In mempacket_test_read(), we've already fetched the top value of the stack, so when we shift the stack, we don't care for the value. The compiler needs to be told, or it will complain harshly when we tell it to be picky. Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Originally PKCS#12 subroutines treated password strings as ASCII. It worked as long as they were pure ASCII, but if there were some none-ASCII characters result was non-interoperable. But fixing it poses problem accessing data protected with broken password. In order to make asscess to old data possible add retry with old-style password. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Follow on from CVE-2016-2179 The investigation and analysis of CVE-2016-2179 highlighted a related flaw. This commit fixes a security "near miss" in the buffered message handling code. Ultimately this is not currently believed to be exploitable due to the reasons outlined below, and therefore there is no CVE for this on its own. The issue this commit fixes is a MITM attack where the attacker can inject a Finished message into the handshake. In the description below it is assumed that the attacker injects the Finished message for the server to receive it. The attack could work equally well the other way around (i.e where the client receives the injected Finished message). The MITM requires the following capabilities: - The ability to manipulate the MTU that the client selects such that it is small enough for the client to fragment Finished messages. - The ability to selectively drop and modify records sent from the client - The ability to inject its own records and send them to the server The MITM forces the client to select a small MTU such that the client will fragment the Finished message. Ideally for the attacker the first fragment will contain all but the last byte of the Finished message, with the second fragment containing the final byte. During the handshake and prior to the client sending the CCS the MITM injects a plaintext Finished message fragment to the server containing all but the final byte of the Finished message. The message sequence number should be the one expected to be used for the real Finished message. OpenSSL will recognise that the received fragment is for the future and will buffer it for later use. After the client sends the CCS it then sends its own Finished message in two fragments. The MITM causes the first of these fragments to be dropped. The OpenSSL server will then receive the second of the fragments and reassemble the complete Finished message consisting of the MITM fragment and the final byte from the real client. The advantage to the attacker in injecting a Finished message is that this provides the capability to modify other handshake messages (e.g. the ClientHello) undetected. A difficulty for the attacker is knowing in advance what impact any of those changes might have on the final byte of the handshake hash that is going to be sent in the "real" Finished message. In the worst case for the attacker this means that only 1 in 256 of such injection attempts will succeed. It may be possible in some situations for the attacker to improve this such that all attempts succeed. For example if the handshake includes client authentication then the final message flight sent by the client will include a Certificate. Certificates are ASN.1 objects where the signed portion is DER encoded. The non-signed portion could be BER encoded and so the attacker could re-encode the certificate such that the hash for the whole handshake comes to a different value. The certificate re-encoding would not be detectable because only the non-signed portion is changed. As this is the final flight of messages sent from the client the attacker knows what the complete hanshake hash value will be that the client will send - and therefore knows what the final byte will be. Through a process of trial and error the attacker can re-encode the certificate until the modified handhshake also has a hash with the same final byte. This means that when the Finished message is verified by the server it will be correct in all cases. In practice the MITM would need to be able to perform the same attack against both the client and the server. If the attack is only performed against the server (say) then the server will not detect the modified handshake, but the client will and will abort the connection. Fortunately, although OpenSSL is vulnerable to Finished message injection, it is not vulnerable if *both* client and server are OpenSSL. The reason is that OpenSSL has a hard "floor" for a minimum MTU size that it will never go below. This minimum means that a Finished message will never be sent in a fragmented form and therefore the MITM does not have one of its pre-requisites. Therefore this could only be exploited if using OpenSSL and some other DTLS peer that had its own and separate Finished message injection flaw. The fix is to ensure buffered messages are cleared on epoch change. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
DTLS can handle out of order record delivery. Additionally since handshake messages can be bigger than will fit into a single packet, the messages can be fragmented across multiple records (as with normal TLS). That means that the messages can arrive mixed up, and we have to reassemble them. We keep a queue of buffered messages that are "from the future", i.e. messages we're not ready to deal with yet but have arrived early. The messages held there may not be full yet - they could be one or more fragments that are still in the process of being reassembled. The code assumes that we will eventually complete the reassembly and when that occurs the complete message is removed from the queue at the point that we need to use it. However, DTLS is also tolerant of packet loss. To get around that DTLS messages can be retransmitted. If we receive a full (non-fragmented) message from the peer after previously having received a fragment of that message, then we ignore the messag...
-
Matt Caswell authored
The enable-zlib option was broken by the recent "const" changes. Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Most of the time, this isn't strictly needed. However, in the default extern model (called relaxed refdef), symbols are treated as weak common objects unless they are initialised. The librarian doesn't include weak symbols in the (static) libraries, which renders them invisible when linking a program with said those libraries, which is a problem at times. Using the strict refdef model is much more like standard C on all other platforms, and thereby avoid the issues that come with the relaxed refdef model. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- Aug 21, 2016
-
-
Andy Polyakov authored
RT#4628 Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
RT#4628 Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Thanks to Brian Smith for reporting this. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Add mutable versions of X509_get0_notBefore and X509_get0_notAfter. Rename X509_SIG_get0_mutable to X509_SIG_getm. Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
-
- Aug 20, 2016
-
-
FdaSilvaYY authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1475)
-
Kurt Roeckx authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> MR: #3176
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by: Dr. Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
-
- Aug 19, 2016
-
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Update certificate and CRL time routines to match new standard. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-