- Aug 31, 2016
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Because some targets execute perl code that might die, we risk incomplete lists. Make it so dying doesn't happen when we're listing targets. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
These tests take a very long time on some platforms, and arent't always strictly necessary. This makes it possible to turn them off. The necessary binaries are still built, though, in case someone still wants to do a manual run. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
crypto/bn/*: x86[_64] division instruction doesn't handle constants, change constraint from 'g' to 'r'. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Note: some shells do not like the command verb to be quoted, so we avoid it unless it's actually necessary. RT#4665 Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Remove NULL check on parameter, and use NULL not ! on buffer. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- Aug 30, 2016
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
The previous commit revealed a long standing problem where CertStatus processing was broken in DTLS. This would have been revealed by better testing - so add some! Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
The function tls_construct_cert_status() is called by both TLS and DTLS code. However it only ever constructed a TLS message header for the message which obviously failed in DTLS. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Build file templates would be looked up like this if the user gave us an additional directory to look for configuration files and build file templates: $OPENSSL_LOCAL_CONFIG_DIR/$OSTYPE-Makefile.tmpl $SOURCEDIR/Configurations/$OSTYPE-Makefile.tmpl $OPENSSL_LOCAL_CONFIG_DIR/Makefile.tmpl $SOURCEDIR/Configurations/Makefile.tmpl So for example, if the user created his own Makefile.tmpl and tried to use it with a unixly config, it would never be user because we have a unix-Makefile.tmpl in our Configurations directory. This is clearly wrong, and this change makes it look in this order instead: $OPENSSL_LOCAL_CONFIG_DIR/$OSTYPE-Makefile.tmpl $OPENSSL_LOCAL_CONFIG_DIR/Makefile.tmpl $SOURCEDIR/Configurations/$OSTYPE-Makefile.tmpl $SOURCEDIR/Configurations/Makefile.tmpl Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
We've done away with Makefile as source of information and now use configdata.pm exclusively. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Make sure the information is kept for reconfiguration too. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- Aug 29, 2016
-
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- Aug 26, 2016
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Because of a perl operator priority mixup, the --openssldir argument wasn't honored. Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
The definition of STITCHED_CALL relies on OPENSSL_NO_ASM. However, when a configuration simply lacks the assembler implementation for RC4 (which is where we have implemented the stitched call), OPENSSL_NO_ASM isn't implemented. Better, then, to rely on specific macros that indicated that RC4 (and MD5) are implemented in assembler. For this to work properly, we must also make sure Configure adds the definition of RC4_ASM among the C flags. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
- Aug 25, 2016
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
EC DRBG support was added in 7fdcb457 in 2011 and then later removed. However the CHANGES entry for its original addition was left behind. This just removes the spurious CHANGES entry. Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
msan detected an uninit read. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
User can make Windows openssl.exe to treat command-line arguments and console input as UTF-8 By setting OPENSSL_WIN32_UTF8 environment variable (to any value). This is likely to be required for data interchangeability with other OSes and PKCS#12 containers generated with Windows CryptoAPI. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
OpenSSL versions before 1.1.0 didn't convert non-ASCII UTF8 PKCS#12 passwords to Unicode correctly. To correctly decrypt older files, if MAC verification fails with the supplied password attempt to use the broken format which is compatible with earlier versions of OpenSSL. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
To avoid possible race conditions don't switch password format using global state in crypto/pkcs12 Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Found by Coverity. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
- Aug 24, 2016
-
-
Viktor Dukhovni authored
It should not have been removed. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Andy Polyakov authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Ensure it is clear to the user why there has been an error. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
The new curves test did not take into account no-ec2m Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
If not, fall back to our own code, using the given mutex Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
For increments, the relaxed model is fine. For decrements, it's recommended to use the acquire release model. We therefore go for the latter. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Note: we trust any other compiler that fully implements GNU extension to define __GNUC__ RT#4642 Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-