separate reads performed - one for the header and one for the body of the
handshake record.

CVE-2014-3571

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>

Conflicts:
	ssl/s3_pkt.c

Reviewed-by: Emilia Kasper <emilia@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit e793809ba50c1e90ab592fb640a856168e50f3de)

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4a4d4158)

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4138e388)

Conflicts:
	CHANGES

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit cb62ab4b)

OpenSSL clients would tolerate temporary RSA keys in non-export
ciphersuites. It also had an option SSL_OP_EPHEMERAL_RSA which
enabled this server side. Remove both options as they are a
protocol violation.

Thanks to Karthikeyan Bhargavan for reporting this issue.
(CVE-2015-0204)
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>

(cherry picked from commit 4b4c1fcc)

Conflicts:
	CHANGES
	doc/ssl/SSL_CTX_set_options.pod
	ssl/d1_srvr.c
	ssl/s3_srvr.c

Fix bug where an OpenSSL client would accept a handshake using an
ephemeral ECDH ciphersuites with the server key exchange message omitted.

Thanks to Karthikeyan Bhargavan for reporting this issue.

CVE-2014-3572
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>

(cherry picked from commit b15f8769)

Conflicts:
	CHANGES
	ssl/s3_clnt.c

By using non-DER or invalid encodings outside the signed portion of a
certificate the fingerprint can be changed without breaking the signature.
Although no details of the signed portion of the certificate can be changed
this can cause problems with some applications: e.g. those using the
certificate fingerprint for blacklists.

1. Reject signatures with non zero unused bits.

If the BIT STRING containing the signature has non zero unused bits reject
the signature. All current signature algorithms require zero unused bits.

2. Check certificate algorithm consistency.

Check the AlgorithmIdentifier inside TBS matches the one in the
certificate signature. NB: this will result in signature failure
errors for some broken certificates.

3. Check DSA/ECDSA signatures use DER.

Reencode DSA/ECDSA signatures and compare with the original received
signature. Return an error if there is a mismatch.

This will reject various cases including garbage after signature
(thanks to Antti Karjalainen and Tuomo Untinen from the Codenomicon CROSS
program for discovering this case) and use of BER or invalid ASN.1 INTEGERs
(negative or with leading zeroes).

CVE-2014-8275
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>

(cherry picked from commit 208a6012)

Conflicts:
	crypto/dsa/dsa_vrf.c

Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>

(these are needed for certificate fingerprint fixes)
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 86edf13b)

According to X6.90 null, object identifier, boolean, integer and enumerated
types can only have primitive encodings: return an error if any of
these are received with a constructed encoding.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>

(cherry picked from commit f5e4b6b5)

Conflicts:
	crypto/asn1/asn1_err.c

Causes more problems than it fixes: even though error codes
are not part of the stable API, several users rely on the
specific error code, and the change breaks them. Conversely,
we don't have any concrete use-cases for constant-time behaviour here.

This reverts commit 1bb01b1b

.

Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit d45282fc)

Signed-off-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

listed after TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV.

RT: 3575
Reviewed-by: Emilia Kasper <emilia@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>

When we're configured with no-ssl3 and we receive an SSL v3 Client Hello, we set
the method to NULL.  We didn't used to do that, and it breaks things.  This is a
regression introduced in 62f45cc2

.  Keep the old
method since the code is not able to deal with a NULL method at this time.

CVE-2014-3569, PR#3571

Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 392fa7a9)

Reviewed-by: Geoff Thorpe <geoff@openssl.org>

so the Win32 compile picks it up correctly.

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit e2e5326e)

The different -I compiler parameters will take care of the rest...

Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8202802f)

Conflicts:
	crypto/evp/evp_enc.c

Reviewed-by: Dr Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 55c7a4cf)

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 40155f40)

Conflicts:
	e_os.h

Reviewed-by: Ben Laurie <ben@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 87d388c9)

The 1**0 test will fail for FIPS capable builds because it uses the
old BIGNUM code in the 1.2 FIPS module which can't be fixed.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Dr Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Bodo Möller <bodo@openssl.org>

CVE-2014-3568

Reviewed-by: Emilia Kasper <emilia@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

CVE-2014-3567

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 90e53055939db40cf0fac1ad0c59630280aeee86)

Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>

handling out of #ifndef OPENSSL_NO_DTLS1 section.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Steve Henson <steve@openss.org>

Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>

Reencode DigestInto in DER and check against the original: this
will reject any improperly encoded DigestInfo structures.

Note: this is a precautionary measure, there is no known attack
which can exploit this.

Thanks to Brian Smith for reporting this issue.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>

Accidentally omitted from commit 455b65df



Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit fdc35a9d)