Commit a6ed5dd6 authored by Ulf Möller's avatar Ulf Möller
Browse files

That was misleading. The problem won't happen with 0.9.6a anyway.

parent 1417f2dc
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+3 −5
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ OpenSSL - Frequently Asked Questions

* Why does the linker complain about undefined symbols?
* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: command not found"?
* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: 1 no implemented" or similar?
* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: 1 no implemented"?
* Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Alpha True64 Unix?
* Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail with "ar: command not found"?
* Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Win32 with VC++?
@@ -324,13 +324,11 @@ You didn't install "bc", the Unix calculator. If you want to run the
tests, get GNU bc from ftp://ftp.gnu.org or from your OS distributor.


* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: 1 no implemented" or similar?
* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: 1 no implemented"?

On some SCO installations or versions, bc has a bug that gets triggered
when you run the test suite (using "make test").  The message returned is
"bc: 1 not implemented".  You may run into something similar on FreeBSD
(version 4.2 has been reported), where the message is "Failed! bc: tmp.bntest
3: print statement" or something similar.
"bc: 1 not implemented".

The best way to deal with this is to find another implementation of bc
and compile/install it.  GNU bc (see http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html