Commit 477fd459 authored by Dr. Stephen Henson's avatar Dr. Stephen Henson
Browse files

PR: 1835 

Submitted by: Damien Miller <djm@mindrot.org>
Approved by: steve@openssl.org

Fix various typos.
parent 30b1b28a

MacOS/GetHTTPS.src/ErrorHandling.hpp

+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ OSErr AppendErrorMessageToHandle(Handle inoutHandle); 






//	A bunch of evil macros that would be uneccessary if I were always using C++ !

//	A bunch of evil macros that would be unnecessary if I were always using C++ !



#define SetErrorMessageAndBailIfNil(theArg,theMessage)								\

{																					\

crypto/asn1/a_bytes.c

+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ ASN1_STRING *d2i_ASN1_type_bytes(ASN1_STRING **a, const unsigned char **pp, 


	if (tag >= 32)

		{

		i=ASN1_R_TAG_VALUE_TOO_HIGH;;

		i=ASN1_R_TAG_VALUE_TOO_HIGH;

		goto err;

		}

	if (!(ASN1_tag2bit(tag) & type))

crypto/bn/bntest.c

+2 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ int test_mod_exp(BIO *bp, BN_CTX *ctx) 
		BN_bntest_rand(b,2+i,0,0); /**/



		if (!BN_mod_exp(d,a,b,c,ctx))

			return(00);

			return(0);



		if (bp != NULL)

			{
@@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ int test_exp(BIO *bp, BN_CTX *ctx) 
		BN_bntest_rand(b,2+i,0,0); /**/



		if (!BN_exp(d,a,b,ctx))

			return(00);

			return(0);



		if (bp != NULL)

			{

crypto/des/times/usparc.cc

+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ solaris 2.5.1 usparc 167mhz?? - SC4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5 


For the ultra sparc, SunC 4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5, running 'des_opts'

gives a speed of 475,000 des/s while 'speed' gives 417,000 des/s.

I belive the difference is tied up in optimisation that the compiler

I believe the difference is tied up in optimisation that the compiler

is able to perform when the code is 'inlined'.  For 'speed', the DES

routines are being linked from a library.  I'll record the higher

speed since if performance is everything, you can always inline

crypto/ripemd/README

+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~bosselae/ripemd160.html 
This is my implementation of RIPEMD-160.  The pentium assember is a little

off the pace since I only get 1050 cycles, while the best is 1013.

I have a few ideas for how to get another 20 or so cycles, but at

this point I will not bother right now.  I belive the trick will be

this point I will not bother right now.  I believe the trick will be

to remove my 'copy X array onto stack' until inside the RIP1() finctions the

first time round.  To do this I need another register and will only have one

temporary one.  A bit tricky....  I can also cleanup the saving of the 5 words