Loading crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl +208 −46 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ # details see http://www.openssl.org/~appro/cryptogams/. # ==================================================================== # # July 2004 # # 2.22x RC4 tune-up:-) It should be noted though that my hand [as in # "hand-coded assembler"] doesn't stand for the whole improvement # coefficient. It turned out that eliminating RC4_CHAR from config Loading @@ -19,6 +21,8 @@ # to operate on partial registers, it turned out to be the best bet. # At least for AMD... How IA32E would perform remains to be seen... # November 2004 # # As was shown by Marc Bevand reordering of couple of load operations # results in even higher performance gain of 3.3x:-) At least on # Opteron... For reference, 1x in this case is RC4_CHAR C-code Loading @@ -26,6 +30,8 @@ # Latter means that if you want to *estimate* what to expect from # *your* Opteron, then multiply 54 by 3.3 and clock frequency in GHz. # November 2004 # # Intel P4 EM64T core was found to run the AMD64 code really slow... # The only way to achieve comparable performance on P4 was to keep # RC4_CHAR. Kind of ironic, huh? As it's apparently impossible to Loading @@ -33,10 +39,14 @@ # on either AMD and Intel platforms, I implement both cases. See # rc4_skey.c for further details... # April 2005 # # P4 EM64T core appears to be "allergic" to 64-bit inc/dec. Replacing # those with add/sub results in 50% performance improvement of folded # loop... # May 2005 # # As was shown by Zou Nanhai loop unrolling can improve Intel EM64T # performance by >30% [unlike P4 32-bit case that is]. But this is # provided that loads are reordered even more aggressively! Both code Loading @@ -50,6 +60,8 @@ # is not implemented, then this final RC4_CHAR code-path should be # preferred, as it provides better *all-round* performance]. # March 2007 # # Intel Core2 was observed to perform poorly on both code paths:-( It # apparently suffers from some kind of partial register stall, which # occurs in 64-bit mode only [as virtually identical 32-bit loop was Loading @@ -58,10 +70,32 @@ # fit for Core2 and therefore the code was modified to skip cloop8 on # this CPU. # May 2010 # # Intel Westmere was observed to perform suboptimally. Adding yet # another movzb to cloop1 improved performance by almost 50%! Core2 # performance is improved too, but nominally... # May 2011 # # The only code path that was not modified is P4-specific one. New # AMD code path is inspired by and Intel optimization is heavily # based on submission from Maxim Locktyukhin of Intel. Current # performance in cycles per processed byte (less is better) and # improvement coefficients relative to previous version of this # module are: # # Opteron 5.3/+0% # P4 6.5 # Core2 6.2/+15%(*) # Westmere 4.2/+60% # Sandy Bridge 4.2/+120% # Atom 9.3/+80% # # (*) Note that this result is ~15% lower than result for 32-bit # code, meaning that it's possible to improve it, but it's # more than likely at the cost of the others... $flavour = shift; $output = shift; if ($flavour =~ /\./) { $output = $flavour; undef $flavour; } Loading @@ -80,11 +114,7 @@ $len="%rsi"; # arg2 $inp="%rdx"; # arg3 $out="%rcx"; # arg4 @XX=("%r8","%r10"); @TX=("%r9","%r11"); $YY="%r12"; $TY="%r13"; { $code=<<___; .text Loading @@ -99,48 +129,173 @@ RC4: or $len,$len push %r12 push %r13 .Lprologue: mov $len,%r11 mov $inp,%r12 mov $out,%r13 ___ my $len="%r11"; # reassign input arguments my $inp="%r12"; my $out="%r13"; my @XX=("%r10","%rsi"); my @TX=("%rax","%rbx"); my $YY="%rcx"; my $TY="%rdx"; add \$8,$dat movl -8($dat),$XX[0]#d movl -4($dat),$YY#d $code.=<<___; xor $XX[0],$XX[0] xor $YY,$YY lea 8($dat),$dat mov -8($dat),$XX[0]#b mov -4($dat),$YY#b cmpl \$-1,256($dat) je .LRC4_CHAR mov OPENSSL_ia32cap_P(%rip),%r8d xor $TX[1],$TX[1] inc $XX[0]#b sub $XX[0],$TX[1] sub $inp,$out movl ($dat,$XX[0],4),$TX[0]#d test \$-8,$len test \$-16,$len jz .Lloop1 jmp .Lloop8 bt \$30,%r8d # Intel CPU Family 6 jc .L16x and \$7,$TX[1] lea 1($XX[0]),$XX[1] jz .Loop8 sub $TX[1],$len .Loop8_warmup: add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b movl ($dat,$YY,4),$TY#d movl $TX[0]#d,($dat,$YY,4) movl $TY#d,($dat,$XX[0],4) add $TY#b,$TX[0]#b inc $XX[0]#b movl ($dat,$TX[0],4),$TY#d movl ($dat,$XX[0],4),$TX[0]#d xorb ($inp),$TY#b movb $TY#b,($out,$inp) lea 1($inp),$inp dec $TX[1] jnz .Loop8_warmup lea 1($XX[0]),$XX[1] jmp .Loop8 .align 16 .Lloop8: .Loop8: ___ for ($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { $code.=<<___ if ($i==7); add \$8,$XX[1]#b ___ $code.=<<___; add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b mov $XX[0],$XX[1] movl ($dat,$YY,4),$TY#d ror \$8,%rax # ror is redundant when $i=0 inc $XX[1]#b movl ($dat,$XX[1],4),$TX[1]#d cmp $XX[1],$YY movl $TX[0]#d,($dat,$YY,4) cmove $TX[0],$TX[1] movl $TY#d,($dat,$XX[0],4) movl `4*($i==7?-1:$i)`($dat,$XX[1],4),$TX[1]#d ror \$8,%r8 # ror is redundant when $i=0 movl $TY#d,4*$i($dat,$XX[0],4) add $TX[0]#b,$TY#b movb ($dat,$TY,4),%al movb ($dat,$TY,4),%r8b ___ push(@TX,shift(@TX)); push(@XX,shift(@XX)); # "rotate" registers push(@TX,shift(@TX)); #push(@XX,shift(@XX)); # "rotate" registers } $code.=<<___; ror \$8,%rax add \$8,$XX[0]#b ror \$8,%r8 sub \$8,$len xor ($inp),%rax add \$8,$inp mov %rax,($out) add \$8,$out xor ($inp),%r8 mov %r8,($out,$inp) lea 8($inp),$inp test \$-8,$len jnz .Lloop8 jnz .Loop8 cmp \$0,$len jne .Lloop1 jmp .Lexit .align 16 .L16x: test \$-32,$len jz .Lloop1 and \$15,$TX[1] jz .Loop16_is_hot sub $TX[1],$len .Loop16_warmup: add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b movl ($dat,$YY,4),$TY#d movl $TX[0]#d,($dat,$YY,4) movl $TY#d,($dat,$XX[0],4) add $TY#b,$TX[0]#b inc $XX[0]#b movl ($dat,$TX[0],4),$TY#d movl ($dat,$XX[0],4),$TX[0]#d xorb ($inp),$TY#b movb $TY#b,($out,$inp) lea 1($inp),$inp dec $TX[1] jnz .Loop16_warmup mov $YY,$TX[1] xor $YY,$YY mov $TX[1]#b,$YY#b .Loop16_is_hot: lea ($dat,$XX[0],4),$XX[1] ___ sub RC4_loop { my $i=shift; my $j=$i<0?0:$i; my $xmm="%xmm".($j&1); $code.=" add \$16,$XX[0]#b\n" if ($i==15); $code.=" movdqu ($inp),%xmm2\n" if ($i==15); $code.=" add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b\n" if ($i<=0); $code.=" movl ($dat,$YY,4),$TY#d\n"; $code.=" pxor %xmm0,%xmm2\n" if ($i==0); $code.=" psllq \$8,%xmm1\n" if ($i==0); $code.=" pxor $xmm,$xmm\n" if ($i<=1); $code.=" movl $TX[0]#d,($dat,$YY,4)\n"; $code.=" add $TY#b,$TX[0]#b\n"; $code.=" movl `4*($j+1)`($XX[1]),$TX[1]#d\n" if ($i<15); $code.=" movz $TX[0]#b,$TX[0]#d\n"; $code.=" movl $TY#d,4*$j($XX[1])\n"; $code.=" pxor %xmm1,%xmm2\n" if ($i==0); $code.=" lea ($dat,$XX[0],4),$XX[1]\n" if ($i==15); $code.=" add $TX[1]#b,$YY#b\n" if ($i<15); $code.=" pinsrw \$`($j>>1)&7`,($dat,$TX[0],4),$xmm\n"; $code.=" movdqu %xmm2,($out,$inp)\n" if ($i==0); $code.=" lea 16($inp),$inp\n" if ($i==0); $code.=" movl ($XX[1]),$TX[1]#d\n" if ($i==15); } RC4_loop(-1); $code.=<<___; jmp .Loop16_enter .align 16 .Loop16: ___ for ($i=0;$i<16;$i++) { $code.=".Loop16_enter:\n" if ($i==1); RC4_loop($i); push(@TX,shift(@TX)); # "rotate" registers } $code.=<<___; mov $YY,$TX[1] xor $YY,$YY # keyword to partial register sub \$16,$len mov $TX[1]#b,$YY#b test \$-16,$len jnz .Loop16 psllq \$8,%xmm1 pxor %xmm0,%xmm2 pxor %xmm1,%xmm2 movdqu %xmm2,($out,$inp) lea 16($inp),$inp cmp \$0,$len jne .Lloop1 jmp .Lexit Loading @@ -156,9 +311,8 @@ $code.=<<___; movl ($dat,$TX[0],4),$TY#d movl ($dat,$XX[0],4),$TX[0]#d xorb ($inp),$TY#b inc $inp movb $TY#b,($out) inc $out movb $TY#b,($out,$inp) lea 1($inp),$inp dec $len jnz .Lloop1 jmp .Lexit Loading @@ -169,13 +323,11 @@ $code.=<<___; movzb ($dat,$XX[0]),$TX[0]#d test \$-8,$len jz .Lcloop1 cmpl \$0,260($dat) jnz .Lcloop1 jmp .Lcloop8 .align 16 .Lcloop8: mov ($inp),%eax mov 4($inp),%ebx mov ($inp),%r8d mov 4($inp),%r9d ___ # unroll 2x4-wise, because 64-bit rotates kill Intel P4... for ($i=0;$i<4;$i++) { Loading @@ -192,8 +344,8 @@ $code.=<<___; mov $TX[0],$TX[1] .Lcmov$i: add $TX[0]#b,$TY#b xor ($dat,$TY),%al ror \$8,%eax xor ($dat,$TY),%r8b ror \$8,%r8d ___ push(@TX,shift(@TX)); push(@XX,shift(@XX)); # "rotate" registers } Loading @@ -211,16 +363,16 @@ $code.=<<___; mov $TX[0],$TX[1] .Lcmov$i: add $TX[0]#b,$TY#b xor ($dat,$TY),%bl ror \$8,%ebx xor ($dat,$TY),%r9b ror \$8,%r9d ___ push(@TX,shift(@TX)); push(@XX,shift(@XX)); # "rotate" registers } $code.=<<___; lea -8($len),$len mov %eax,($out) mov %r8d,($out) lea 8($inp),$inp mov %ebx,4($out) mov %r9d,4($out) lea 8($out),$out test \$-8,$len Loading Loading @@ -265,6 +417,7 @@ $code.=<<___; ret .size RC4,.-RC4 ___ } $idx="%r8"; $ido="%r9"; Loading @@ -285,12 +438,11 @@ RC4_set_key: xor %r11,%r11 mov OPENSSL_ia32cap_P(%rip),$idx#d bt \$20,$idx#d bt \$20,$idx#d # Intel CPU jnc .Lw1stloop bt \$30,$idx#d setc $ido#b mov $ido#d,260($dat) jmp .Lc1stloop bt \$30,$idx#d # Intel CPU Family 6 jnc .Lc1stloop jmp .Lw1stloop .align 16 .Lw1stloop: Loading Loading @@ -364,7 +516,7 @@ RC4_options: .Lopts: .asciz "rc4(8x,int)" .asciz "rc4(8x,char)" .asciz "rc4(1x,char)" .asciz "rc4(16x,int)" .asciz "RC4 for x86_64, CRYPTOGAMS by <appro\@openssl.org>" .align 64 .size RC4_options,.-RC4_options Loading Loading @@ -502,7 +654,17 @@ key_se_handler: ___ } $code =~ s/#([bwd])/$1/gm; sub reg_part { my ($reg,$conv)=@_; if ($reg =~ /%r[0-9]+/) { $reg .= $conv; } elsif ($conv eq "b") { $reg =~ s/%[er]([^x]+)x?/%$1l/; } elsif ($conv eq "w") { $reg =~ s/%[er](.+)/%$1/; } elsif ($conv eq "d") { $reg =~ s/%[er](.+)/%e$1/; } return $reg; } $code =~ s/(%[a-z0-9]+)#([bwd])/reg_part($1,$2)/gem; $code =~ s/\`([^\`]*)\`/eval $1/gem; print $code; Loading Loading
crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl +208 −46 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ # details see http://www.openssl.org/~appro/cryptogams/. # ==================================================================== # # July 2004 # # 2.22x RC4 tune-up:-) It should be noted though that my hand [as in # "hand-coded assembler"] doesn't stand for the whole improvement # coefficient. It turned out that eliminating RC4_CHAR from config Loading @@ -19,6 +21,8 @@ # to operate on partial registers, it turned out to be the best bet. # At least for AMD... How IA32E would perform remains to be seen... # November 2004 # # As was shown by Marc Bevand reordering of couple of load operations # results in even higher performance gain of 3.3x:-) At least on # Opteron... For reference, 1x in this case is RC4_CHAR C-code Loading @@ -26,6 +30,8 @@ # Latter means that if you want to *estimate* what to expect from # *your* Opteron, then multiply 54 by 3.3 and clock frequency in GHz. # November 2004 # # Intel P4 EM64T core was found to run the AMD64 code really slow... # The only way to achieve comparable performance on P4 was to keep # RC4_CHAR. Kind of ironic, huh? As it's apparently impossible to Loading @@ -33,10 +39,14 @@ # on either AMD and Intel platforms, I implement both cases. See # rc4_skey.c for further details... # April 2005 # # P4 EM64T core appears to be "allergic" to 64-bit inc/dec. Replacing # those with add/sub results in 50% performance improvement of folded # loop... # May 2005 # # As was shown by Zou Nanhai loop unrolling can improve Intel EM64T # performance by >30% [unlike P4 32-bit case that is]. But this is # provided that loads are reordered even more aggressively! Both code Loading @@ -50,6 +60,8 @@ # is not implemented, then this final RC4_CHAR code-path should be # preferred, as it provides better *all-round* performance]. # March 2007 # # Intel Core2 was observed to perform poorly on both code paths:-( It # apparently suffers from some kind of partial register stall, which # occurs in 64-bit mode only [as virtually identical 32-bit loop was Loading @@ -58,10 +70,32 @@ # fit for Core2 and therefore the code was modified to skip cloop8 on # this CPU. # May 2010 # # Intel Westmere was observed to perform suboptimally. Adding yet # another movzb to cloop1 improved performance by almost 50%! Core2 # performance is improved too, but nominally... # May 2011 # # The only code path that was not modified is P4-specific one. New # AMD code path is inspired by and Intel optimization is heavily # based on submission from Maxim Locktyukhin of Intel. Current # performance in cycles per processed byte (less is better) and # improvement coefficients relative to previous version of this # module are: # # Opteron 5.3/+0% # P4 6.5 # Core2 6.2/+15%(*) # Westmere 4.2/+60% # Sandy Bridge 4.2/+120% # Atom 9.3/+80% # # (*) Note that this result is ~15% lower than result for 32-bit # code, meaning that it's possible to improve it, but it's # more than likely at the cost of the others... $flavour = shift; $output = shift; if ($flavour =~ /\./) { $output = $flavour; undef $flavour; } Loading @@ -80,11 +114,7 @@ $len="%rsi"; # arg2 $inp="%rdx"; # arg3 $out="%rcx"; # arg4 @XX=("%r8","%r10"); @TX=("%r9","%r11"); $YY="%r12"; $TY="%r13"; { $code=<<___; .text Loading @@ -99,48 +129,173 @@ RC4: or $len,$len push %r12 push %r13 .Lprologue: mov $len,%r11 mov $inp,%r12 mov $out,%r13 ___ my $len="%r11"; # reassign input arguments my $inp="%r12"; my $out="%r13"; my @XX=("%r10","%rsi"); my @TX=("%rax","%rbx"); my $YY="%rcx"; my $TY="%rdx"; add \$8,$dat movl -8($dat),$XX[0]#d movl -4($dat),$YY#d $code.=<<___; xor $XX[0],$XX[0] xor $YY,$YY lea 8($dat),$dat mov -8($dat),$XX[0]#b mov -4($dat),$YY#b cmpl \$-1,256($dat) je .LRC4_CHAR mov OPENSSL_ia32cap_P(%rip),%r8d xor $TX[1],$TX[1] inc $XX[0]#b sub $XX[0],$TX[1] sub $inp,$out movl ($dat,$XX[0],4),$TX[0]#d test \$-8,$len test \$-16,$len jz .Lloop1 jmp .Lloop8 bt \$30,%r8d # Intel CPU Family 6 jc .L16x and \$7,$TX[1] lea 1($XX[0]),$XX[1] jz .Loop8 sub $TX[1],$len .Loop8_warmup: add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b movl ($dat,$YY,4),$TY#d movl $TX[0]#d,($dat,$YY,4) movl $TY#d,($dat,$XX[0],4) add $TY#b,$TX[0]#b inc $XX[0]#b movl ($dat,$TX[0],4),$TY#d movl ($dat,$XX[0],4),$TX[0]#d xorb ($inp),$TY#b movb $TY#b,($out,$inp) lea 1($inp),$inp dec $TX[1] jnz .Loop8_warmup lea 1($XX[0]),$XX[1] jmp .Loop8 .align 16 .Lloop8: .Loop8: ___ for ($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { $code.=<<___ if ($i==7); add \$8,$XX[1]#b ___ $code.=<<___; add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b mov $XX[0],$XX[1] movl ($dat,$YY,4),$TY#d ror \$8,%rax # ror is redundant when $i=0 inc $XX[1]#b movl ($dat,$XX[1],4),$TX[1]#d cmp $XX[1],$YY movl $TX[0]#d,($dat,$YY,4) cmove $TX[0],$TX[1] movl $TY#d,($dat,$XX[0],4) movl `4*($i==7?-1:$i)`($dat,$XX[1],4),$TX[1]#d ror \$8,%r8 # ror is redundant when $i=0 movl $TY#d,4*$i($dat,$XX[0],4) add $TX[0]#b,$TY#b movb ($dat,$TY,4),%al movb ($dat,$TY,4),%r8b ___ push(@TX,shift(@TX)); push(@XX,shift(@XX)); # "rotate" registers push(@TX,shift(@TX)); #push(@XX,shift(@XX)); # "rotate" registers } $code.=<<___; ror \$8,%rax add \$8,$XX[0]#b ror \$8,%r8 sub \$8,$len xor ($inp),%rax add \$8,$inp mov %rax,($out) add \$8,$out xor ($inp),%r8 mov %r8,($out,$inp) lea 8($inp),$inp test \$-8,$len jnz .Lloop8 jnz .Loop8 cmp \$0,$len jne .Lloop1 jmp .Lexit .align 16 .L16x: test \$-32,$len jz .Lloop1 and \$15,$TX[1] jz .Loop16_is_hot sub $TX[1],$len .Loop16_warmup: add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b movl ($dat,$YY,4),$TY#d movl $TX[0]#d,($dat,$YY,4) movl $TY#d,($dat,$XX[0],4) add $TY#b,$TX[0]#b inc $XX[0]#b movl ($dat,$TX[0],4),$TY#d movl ($dat,$XX[0],4),$TX[0]#d xorb ($inp),$TY#b movb $TY#b,($out,$inp) lea 1($inp),$inp dec $TX[1] jnz .Loop16_warmup mov $YY,$TX[1] xor $YY,$YY mov $TX[1]#b,$YY#b .Loop16_is_hot: lea ($dat,$XX[0],4),$XX[1] ___ sub RC4_loop { my $i=shift; my $j=$i<0?0:$i; my $xmm="%xmm".($j&1); $code.=" add \$16,$XX[0]#b\n" if ($i==15); $code.=" movdqu ($inp),%xmm2\n" if ($i==15); $code.=" add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b\n" if ($i<=0); $code.=" movl ($dat,$YY,4),$TY#d\n"; $code.=" pxor %xmm0,%xmm2\n" if ($i==0); $code.=" psllq \$8,%xmm1\n" if ($i==0); $code.=" pxor $xmm,$xmm\n" if ($i<=1); $code.=" movl $TX[0]#d,($dat,$YY,4)\n"; $code.=" add $TY#b,$TX[0]#b\n"; $code.=" movl `4*($j+1)`($XX[1]),$TX[1]#d\n" if ($i<15); $code.=" movz $TX[0]#b,$TX[0]#d\n"; $code.=" movl $TY#d,4*$j($XX[1])\n"; $code.=" pxor %xmm1,%xmm2\n" if ($i==0); $code.=" lea ($dat,$XX[0],4),$XX[1]\n" if ($i==15); $code.=" add $TX[1]#b,$YY#b\n" if ($i<15); $code.=" pinsrw \$`($j>>1)&7`,($dat,$TX[0],4),$xmm\n"; $code.=" movdqu %xmm2,($out,$inp)\n" if ($i==0); $code.=" lea 16($inp),$inp\n" if ($i==0); $code.=" movl ($XX[1]),$TX[1]#d\n" if ($i==15); } RC4_loop(-1); $code.=<<___; jmp .Loop16_enter .align 16 .Loop16: ___ for ($i=0;$i<16;$i++) { $code.=".Loop16_enter:\n" if ($i==1); RC4_loop($i); push(@TX,shift(@TX)); # "rotate" registers } $code.=<<___; mov $YY,$TX[1] xor $YY,$YY # keyword to partial register sub \$16,$len mov $TX[1]#b,$YY#b test \$-16,$len jnz .Loop16 psllq \$8,%xmm1 pxor %xmm0,%xmm2 pxor %xmm1,%xmm2 movdqu %xmm2,($out,$inp) lea 16($inp),$inp cmp \$0,$len jne .Lloop1 jmp .Lexit Loading @@ -156,9 +311,8 @@ $code.=<<___; movl ($dat,$TX[0],4),$TY#d movl ($dat,$XX[0],4),$TX[0]#d xorb ($inp),$TY#b inc $inp movb $TY#b,($out) inc $out movb $TY#b,($out,$inp) lea 1($inp),$inp dec $len jnz .Lloop1 jmp .Lexit Loading @@ -169,13 +323,11 @@ $code.=<<___; movzb ($dat,$XX[0]),$TX[0]#d test \$-8,$len jz .Lcloop1 cmpl \$0,260($dat) jnz .Lcloop1 jmp .Lcloop8 .align 16 .Lcloop8: mov ($inp),%eax mov 4($inp),%ebx mov ($inp),%r8d mov 4($inp),%r9d ___ # unroll 2x4-wise, because 64-bit rotates kill Intel P4... for ($i=0;$i<4;$i++) { Loading @@ -192,8 +344,8 @@ $code.=<<___; mov $TX[0],$TX[1] .Lcmov$i: add $TX[0]#b,$TY#b xor ($dat,$TY),%al ror \$8,%eax xor ($dat,$TY),%r8b ror \$8,%r8d ___ push(@TX,shift(@TX)); push(@XX,shift(@XX)); # "rotate" registers } Loading @@ -211,16 +363,16 @@ $code.=<<___; mov $TX[0],$TX[1] .Lcmov$i: add $TX[0]#b,$TY#b xor ($dat,$TY),%bl ror \$8,%ebx xor ($dat,$TY),%r9b ror \$8,%r9d ___ push(@TX,shift(@TX)); push(@XX,shift(@XX)); # "rotate" registers } $code.=<<___; lea -8($len),$len mov %eax,($out) mov %r8d,($out) lea 8($inp),$inp mov %ebx,4($out) mov %r9d,4($out) lea 8($out),$out test \$-8,$len Loading Loading @@ -265,6 +417,7 @@ $code.=<<___; ret .size RC4,.-RC4 ___ } $idx="%r8"; $ido="%r9"; Loading @@ -285,12 +438,11 @@ RC4_set_key: xor %r11,%r11 mov OPENSSL_ia32cap_P(%rip),$idx#d bt \$20,$idx#d bt \$20,$idx#d # Intel CPU jnc .Lw1stloop bt \$30,$idx#d setc $ido#b mov $ido#d,260($dat) jmp .Lc1stloop bt \$30,$idx#d # Intel CPU Family 6 jnc .Lc1stloop jmp .Lw1stloop .align 16 .Lw1stloop: Loading Loading @@ -364,7 +516,7 @@ RC4_options: .Lopts: .asciz "rc4(8x,int)" .asciz "rc4(8x,char)" .asciz "rc4(1x,char)" .asciz "rc4(16x,int)" .asciz "RC4 for x86_64, CRYPTOGAMS by <appro\@openssl.org>" .align 64 .size RC4_options,.-RC4_options Loading Loading @@ -502,7 +654,17 @@ key_se_handler: ___ } $code =~ s/#([bwd])/$1/gm; sub reg_part { my ($reg,$conv)=@_; if ($reg =~ /%r[0-9]+/) { $reg .= $conv; } elsif ($conv eq "b") { $reg =~ s/%[er]([^x]+)x?/%$1l/; } elsif ($conv eq "w") { $reg =~ s/%[er](.+)/%$1/; } elsif ($conv eq "d") { $reg =~ s/%[er](.+)/%e$1/; } return $reg; } $code =~ s/(%[a-z0-9]+)#([bwd])/reg_part($1,$2)/gem; $code =~ s/\`([^\`]*)\`/eval $1/gem; print $code; Loading