Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
T
TLMSP curl
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
CYBER - Cyber Security
TS 103 523 MSP
TLMSP
TLMSP curl
Commits
e94c46c0
Commit
e94c46c0
authored
21 years ago
by
Daniel Stenberg
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Removed John Clayton's really odd bug since its never been reported again and
it was quite a long time since he experienced that one.
parent
9d311ff2
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
docs/KNOWN_BUGS
+0
-60
0 additions, 60 deletions
docs/KNOWN_BUGS
with
0 additions
and
60 deletions
docs/KNOWN_BUGS
+
0
−
60
View file @
e94c46c0
...
...
@@ -55,63 +55,3 @@ may have been fixed since this was written!
and havoc is what happens.
More details on this is found in this libcurl mailing list thread:
http://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2002-08/0000.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q: My program blows up when I run lots of curl_easy_perform() calls on a
single thread
Q: My program dies when a single thread re-enters the win32 select() call
via curl_easy_perform()
Q: --- add your own flavour here ---
Single Threaded Re-Entracy
--------------------------
There is a glitch / trick to using cURL on Win32 related to re-entrancy.
This experience was gained on verion 7.9.4 using Windows NT SP3 in a banking
environment (just in case you wanted to know).
If you have already called curl_easy_perform(), and *somehow* you cause your
single thread of execution to make another call to curl_easy_perform() - the
windows socket() call used to create a new socket for the second connection
can return with 10044 / 10043 error codes.
The WSA errors we experienced are:
WSAEPROTONOSUPPORT
(10043)
Protocol not supported.
The requested protocol has not been configured into the system, or no
implementation for it exists. For example, a socket call requests a
SOCK_DGRAM socket, but specifies a stream protocol.
WSAESOCKTNOSUPPORT
(10044)
Socket type not supported.
The support for the specified socket type does not exist in this address
family. For example, the optional type SOCK_RAW might be selected in a
socket call, and the implementation does not support SOCK_RAW sockets at
all.
We have experienced this by creating a timer that ticks every 20ms, and on
the tick making a curl_easy_perform() call. The call usually completed in
about 300ms. And we expected (before this test) that the timer would NOT be
fired during a call to curl_easy_perform(), howvever, while the first
curl_easy_perform() is running a tick *is* fired by the windows API somehow,
and we then call curl_easy_perform() again - thus single threaded
re-entrancy is achieved.
Notes:
* We made sure that a new CURL structure was being used for each
curl_easy_perform() request, and that the curl_global_init() had been called
beforehand.
* I'm happy to answer any questions about this problem to try to track it
down.
* Once the socket() call started failing, there is no hope - it never works
again.
* Slowing the timer down to give each request enough time to complete solves
this problem completely.
If anyone has the source code to the WinNT implementation of socket() and
can figure out WHY this can occur, more tracing can be performed.
John Clayton <John.Clayton at barclayscapital.com>
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment