Commit a0d90673 authored by Daniel Stenberg's avatar Daniel Stenberg
Browse files

After having studied one of the coverity.com reports at length last night, I

decided it was a good idea to properly document my thoughts in a comment near
the code that was identified as a possible flaw. A false positive as far as I
can see.
parent 98b13037
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+7 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -4240,6 +4240,13 @@ operate(struct Configurable *config, int argc, argv_item_t argv[])
      for(i = 0;
          (url = urls?glob_next_url(urls):(i?NULL:strdup(url)));
          i++) {
        /* NOTE: In the condition expression in the for() statement above, the
           'url' variable is only ever strdup()ed if (i == 0) and thus never
           when this loops later on. Further down in this function we call
           free(url) and then the code loops. Static code parsers may thus get
           tricked into believing that we have a potential access-after-free
           here.  I can however not spot any such case. */

        int infd = STDIN_FILENO;
        bool infdopen;
        char *outfile;