Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
T
TLMSP curl
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
CYBER - Cyber Security
TS 103 523 MSP
TLMSP
TLMSP curl
Commits
86f91687
Commit
86f91687
authored
15 years ago
by
Yang Tse
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
mention last changes
parent
f7690db3
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
Tags
curl-7_12_0
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
CHANGES
+12
-0
12 additions, 0 deletions
CHANGES
with
12 additions
and
0 deletions
CHANGES
+
12
−
0
View file @
86f91687
...
...
@@ -6,6 +6,18 @@
Changelog
Yang Tse (14 Sep 2009)
- Revert Joshua Kwan's patch committed 11 Sep 2009.
Some systems poll function sets POLLHUP in revents without setting
POLLIN, and sets POLLERR without setting POLLIN and POLLOUT. In some
libcurl code execution paths this could trigger busy wait loops with
high CPU usage until a timeout condition aborted the loop.
The reverted patch addressed the above issue for a very specific case,
when awaiting c-ares to resolve. A libcurl-wide fix for Curl_poll now
superceeds this one.
Guenter Knauf (11 Sep 2009)
- Joshua Kwan provided a patch to pass POLLERR / POLLHUP back to c-ares.
This fixes a loop problem with high CPU usage.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment