Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
KNOWN_BUGS 3.75 KiB
Newer Older
  • Learn to ignore specific revisions
  • These are problems known to exist at the time of this release. Feel free to
    join in and help us correct one or more of these! Also be sure to check the
    changelog of the current development status, as one or more of these problems
    may have been fixed since this was written!
    
    * Running 'make test' on Mac OS X gives 4 errors. This seems to be related
      to some kind of libtool problem:
      http://curl.haxx.se/mail/archive-2002-03/0029.html and
      http://curl.haxx.se/mail/archive-2002-03/0033.html
    
    
    Daniel Stenberg's avatar
    Daniel Stenberg committed
    * libcurl does not deal nicely with files larger than 2GB
    
    * GOPHER transfers seem broken
    
    * configure --disable-http is not fully supported. All other protocols seem
      to work to disable.
    
    
    * The -m parameter does not work when using telnet with curl on Windows.
    
    
    * If a HTTP server responds to a HEAD request and includes a body (thus
      violating the RFC2616), curl won't wait to read the response but just stop
      reading and return back. If a second request (let's assume a GET) is then
      immediately made to the same server again, the connection will be re-used
      fine of course, and the second request will be sent off but when the
      response is to get read, the previous response-body is what curl will read
      and havoc is what happens.
      More details on this is found in this libcurl mailing list thread:
      http://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2002-08/0000.html
    
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Q: My program blows up when I run lots of curl_easy_perform() calls on a
    single thread
    Q: My program dies when a single thread re-enters the win32 select() call
    via curl_easy_perform()
    Q: --- add your own flavour here ---
    
    Single Threaded Re-Entracy
    --------------------------
    
    There is a glitch / trick to using cURL on Win32 related to re-entrancy.
    This experience was gained on verion 7.9.4 using Windows NT SP3 in a banking
    environment (just in case you wanted to know).
    
    If you have already called curl_easy_perform(), and *somehow* you cause your
    single thread of execution to make another call to curl_easy_perform() - the
    windows socket() call used to create a new socket for the second connection
    can return with 10044 / 10043 error codes.
    
    The WSA errors we experienced are:
    WSAEPROTONOSUPPORT 
    (10043) 
    Protocol not supported. 
    The requested protocol has not been configured into the system, or no
    implementation for it exists. For example, a socket call requests a
    SOCK_DGRAM socket, but specifies a stream protocol. 
    
    WSAESOCKTNOSUPPORT 
    (10044) 
    Socket type not supported. 
    The support for the specified socket type does not exist in this address
    family. For example, the optional type SOCK_RAW might be selected in a
    socket call, and the implementation does not support SOCK_RAW sockets at
    all. 
    
    We have experienced this by creating a timer that ticks every 20ms, and on
    the tick making a curl_easy_perform() call.  The call usually completed in
    about 300ms.  And we expected (before this test) that the timer would NOT be
    fired during a call to curl_easy_perform(), howvever, while the first
    curl_easy_perform() is running a tick *is* fired by the windows API somehow,
    and we then call curl_easy_perform() again - thus single threaded
    re-entrancy is achieved.
    
    Notes:
    * We made sure that a new CURL structure was being used for each
    curl_easy_perform() request, and that the curl_global_init() had been called
    beforehand.  
    * I'm happy to answer any questions about this problem to try to track it
    down.
    * Once the socket() call started failing, there is no hope - it never works
    again.
    * Slowing the timer down to give each request enough time to complete solves
    this problem completely.
    
    If anyone has the source code to the WinNT implementation of socket() and
    can figure out WHY this can occur, more tracing can be performed.
    
            John Clayton <John.Clayton at barclayscapital.com>