Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
README.httpauth 3.03 KiB
Newer Older
  • Learn to ignore specific revisions
  • Daniel Stenberg's avatar
    Daniel Stenberg committed
    
    1. PUT/POST without a known auth to use (possibly no auth required):
    
       (When explicitly set to use a multi-pass auth when doing a POST/PUT,
       libcurl should immediately go the Content-Length: 0 bytes route to avoid
       the first send all data phase, step 2. If told to use a single-pass auth,
       goto step 3.)
    
       Issue the proper PUT/POST request immediately, with the correct
       Content-Length and Expect: headers.
    
       If a 100 response is received or the wait for one times out, start sending
       the request-body.
    
       If a 401 (or 407 when talking through a proxy) is received, then:
    
       If we have "more than just a little" data left to send, close the
       connection. Exactly what "more than just a little" means will have to be
       determined. Possibly the current transfer speed should be taken into
       account as well.
    
    2. PUT/POST with multi-pass auth but not yet completely negotiated:
    
       Send a PUT/POST request, we know that it will be rejected and thus we claim
       Content-Length zero to avoid having to send the request-body. (This seems
       to be what IE does.)
    
    3. PUT/POST as the last step in the auth negotiation, that is when we have
       what we believe is a completed negotiation:
    
       Send a full and proper PUT/POST request (again) with the proper
       Content-Length and a following request-body.
    
       NOTE: this may very well be the second (or even third) time the whole or at
       least parts of the request body is sent to the server. Since the data may
       be provided to libcurl with a callback, we need a way to tell the app that
       the upload is to be restarted so that the callback will provide data from
       the start again.  This requires an API method/mechanism that libcurl
       doesn't have today. See below.
    
    Data Rewind
    
       It will be troublesome for some apps to deal with a rewind like this in all
       circumstances. I'm thinking for example when using 'curl' to upload data
       from stdin. If libcurl ends up having to rewind the reading for a request
       to succeed, of course a lack of this callback or if it returns failure, will
       cause the request to fail completely.
    
       The new callback is set with CURLOPT_IOCTLFUNCTION (in an attempt to add a
       more generic function that might be used for other IO-related controls in
       the future):
    
         curlioerr curl_ioctl(CURL *handle, curliocmd cmd, void *clientp);
    
       And in the case where the read is to be rewinded, it would be called with a
       cmd named CURLIOCMD_RESTARTREAD. The callback would then return CURLIOE_OK,
       if things are fine, or CURLIOE_FAILRESTART if not.
    
    Backwards Compatibility
    
       The approach used until now, that issues a HEAD on the given URL to trigger
       the auth negotiation could still be supported and encouraged, but it would
       be up to the app to first fetch a URL with GET/HEAD to negotiate on, since
       then a following PUT/POST wouldn't need to negotiate authentication and
       thus avoid double-sending data.
    
       Optionally, we keep the current approach if some option is set
       (CURLOPT_HEADBEFOREAUTH or similar), since it seems to work fairly well for
       POST on most servers.