We need to mark various bitfields as signed to follow the spec.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80698 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80697 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

naming each beta release to come later, but, in short,
I think it just will cause major confusion for the outside world


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80696 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

fixes I've been thinking about are somewhere deep in my mind I can't
find at the moment.  I'm ready to "throw in the towel" so that unix
1.3.0 can get out there, and get into reviewer's hot little hands.  I
know of a few groups that want to benchmark it, but really would prefer
to benchmark something released.  I really don't want to see us with
win32 tied to unix release schedule forever... it's pointless.

It's all just names anyhow.  Whether we call it a beta or a current
release it's just a name.  It's time we at least had a "release candidate"
to use the 1.2 terminology... I'm with Roy, I want to drop the x.ybz
designations.  I want x.y.z, a single numbering scheme.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80695 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

for graceful restarts.  Given that the only usage of SIGURG is now
protected by a #ifdef we don't really need the definition.  ... similarly
for BeOS, why define SIGBUS SIGSEGV?


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80694 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

properly marked for closure on fork().

PR:		2000
Submitted by:	J�rgen Keil <jk@tools.de>


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80693 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80692 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80690 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

Change to +0 my vote for inclusion APACI. I am still slightly tempted to -1,
but for no good reason other than the incredibly condescending comments
associated with it. This addition has been a classic exercise in social
and political ineptness. C'est la vie; it's good code. No release soon,
anyway, so I guess code freeze is over.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80688 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80687 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

since these flags must be present both for compile and link


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80686 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

or in a proxy request (this shouldn't return a 404 anyway, but a 400)


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80685 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80683 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80682 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80679 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80677 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80676 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80675 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80674 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80673 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80672 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80671 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

be marked const and save on per-child memory requirements.

WIN32 folks, Ben said you could handle this... you've got to compile
something and then run it to generate the tables.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80670 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80669 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80668 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

Obtained from:
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Add a new section where we just add Notes and Words Of Wisdom about
porting Apache to various platforms... Seemed to make better sense to
put it here rather than README (??)


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80666 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

Obtained from: Lars <lars@informatik.uni-siegen.de>
Submitted by:	Jim Jagielski
Reviewed by:
Add the SCO_SV port


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80665 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80664 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

testsuite...  Is there some other bug I'm not seeing Martin?  There was
some bogus code previously (namely the test uptr->port == port... 'cause
it was always true... thanks for spotting that).

The test_util_uri thing doesn't test bogus ports, or any other bogosities.
That would be a welcome addition.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80663 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80662 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80661 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

They force CC to use mixed case and underscores in the generated *.o files
(And I wonder why that is not the default in the POSIX subsystem)
Without these flags, no two global variables/functions may ever appear which
only differ in case.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80660 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80659 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80658 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80657 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80656 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

objects for the various platforms.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80655 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80654 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

to be included for Apache 1.3 or finally ignored. Please add your votes.  But
don't hurry. Take some time for a good decision, please.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80653 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

for the build types (debug vs. release)


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@80652 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68