1. 19 Apr, 2002 10 commits
  2. 18 Apr, 2002 15 commits
  3. 17 Apr, 2002 12 commits
  4. 16 Apr, 2002 3 commits
    • Justin Erenkrantz's avatar
      Add warning message when selecting an experimental MPM. · 8460e2b7
      Justin Erenkrantz authored
      While this message will scroll by without their reading it, we can
      reasonably say that we warned them if they report errors.
      
      
      git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@94674 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
      8460e2b7
    • Brian Pane's avatar
      Added support for the threadpool MPM · c6f9454b
      Brian Pane authored
      
      git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@94673 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
      c6f9454b
    • Brian Pane's avatar
      Another experimental MPM derived from worker: · d23b8ff6
      Brian Pane authored
      The threadpool MPM implements Aaron Bannert's "time-space tradeoff"
      design managing idle workers.  Rather than putting accepted connections
      into a queue, the threadpool MPM keeps idle worker threads in a stack.
      Its dedicated listener thread retrieves an idle worker from the stack
      before accepting a connection.  If there are no idle workers, the
      listener blocks until a worker becomes available before doing an accept.
      
      In many ways, threadpool is also a variant of leader/follower.  They
      both maintain a stack of idle threads.  The difference is that threadpool
      has a dedicated listener thread, and leader/follower rotates the listening
      responsibility among its worker threads.  In my initial testing, the
      leader/follower MPM performs very well on multiprocessor Solaris 8 when
      listening on a single port, but poorly when listening on multiple ports.
      (I don't know why this is happening.  What I've found so far is that
      when you add a poll on the listen socket(s) before the accept in the
      leader/follower MPM, all the socket-related syscalls in the httpd get
      slower.  My hypothesis is that the thread scheduler is making an optimal
      decision about where (on what CPU) to run the newly awakened thread if
      its first syscall is an accept, and a nonoptimal decision if its first
      syscall is a poll.)  The threadpool MPM performs better with multiple
      listener ports, and in my testing so far it looks competitive with
      leader/follower when running with a single listener.
      
      
      git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@94672 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
      d23b8ff6