Commits · 875078241d0f34cbdd0aee8afb9232ecedc01b60 · CYBER - Cyber Security / TS 103 523 MSP / TLMSP / TLMSP Apache Httpd · GitLab

Aug 28, 2011
- simple doc for MaxRanges. · 87507824
  Eric Covener authored Aug 28, 2011
  87507824
- add MaxRanges directive institute a default limit of 200 (post-merge where · fe1ee0a5
  Eric Covener authored Aug 28, 2011
  fe1ee0a5
- Fix iteration over string · b14e8a73
  Stefan Fritsch authored Aug 28, 2011
  b14e8a73
- Every 32 ranges, pass the prepared ranges down the filter chain. · 81439676
  Stefan Fritsch authored Aug 28, 2011
  81439676
- * Do a better estimation on how elements we should allocate: · b7df1544
  Ruediger Pluem authored Aug 28, 2011
  b7df1544
- * Silence compiler warning · 132589ab
  Ruediger Pluem authored Aug 28, 2011
  132589ab
- * Damm it. Missed another superflous whitespace. · 57d681b0
  Ruediger Pluem authored Aug 28, 2011
  57d681b0
- * More style police. No functional changes · 2abcc2c9
  Ruediger Pluem authored Aug 28, 2011
  2abcc2c9
- * Style police. No functional changes · baab6a2a
  Ruediger Pluem authored Aug 28, 2011
  baab6a2a
- Better safe than sorry: with OpenSSL 1.0, X509_STORE_CTX_get_current_cert() · f68e2921
  Kaspar Brand authored Aug 28, 2011
  f68e2921
- Fix the default OCSP responder timeout for client cert · 8752bf47
  Kaspar Brand authored Aug 28, 2011
  8752bf47
Aug 27, 2011
- merge some more adjacent ranges such as a-n,n+1-b, and · efb10270
  Eric Covener authored Aug 27, 2011
  efb10270
- reverting. got feedback that maybe we don't want to merge 4-5,1-2 into 1-5 · c5a97a06
  Greg Ames authored Aug 27, 2011
  c5a97a06
- merge totally reversed ranges like 4-5,1-2 into 1-5 · 2f01f6ff
  Greg Ames authored Aug 27, 2011
  2f01f6ff
- fix typo · ba010068
  Stefan Fritsch authored Aug 27, 2011
  ba010068
- remove obsolete macro · de45d5b5
  Stefan Fritsch authored Aug 27, 2011
  de45d5b5
- Updates. · 4d283bed
  Lucien Gentis authored Aug 27, 2011
  4d283bed
- If the sum of all ranges in a request is not smaller than the file, fall back · b0bad2da
  Stefan Fritsch authored Aug 27, 2011
  b0bad2da
- fix function name in log message · 064786d9
  Stefan Fritsch authored Aug 27, 2011
  064786d9
Aug 26, 2011
- Remove traces of byterange_ctx, it's not necessary anymore · b4df3a35
  Stefan Fritsch authored Aug 26, 2011
  b4df3a35
- not ruby · 0036d6fd
  Jim Jagielski authored Aug 26, 2011
  0036d6fd
- Final tuneage · 8236257d
  Jim Jagielski authored Aug 26, 2011
  8236257d
- one off · 3a4171ff
  Jim Jagielski authored Aug 26, 2011
  3a4171ff
- remove merge hit r1161778 · 234bb5c4
  Jim Jagielski authored Aug 26, 2011
  234bb5c4
- More merge fixes... · f422e35e
  Jim Jagielski authored Aug 26, 2011
  f422e35e
- Reset with latest · 1514e64b
  Jim Jagielski authored Aug 26, 2011
  1514e64b
- * Don't SEGFAULT if SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFile is not set. Just skip... · 4fe69a70
  Ruediger Pluem authored Aug 26, 2011
  4fe69a70
Aug 25, 2011
- Put parsed ranges into an array and perform merges on that array. · fc3b8852
  Stefan Fritsch authored Aug 25, 2011
  fc3b8852
- count ranges by simply counting commas · b4201233
  Stefan Fritsch authored Aug 25, 2011
  b4201233
- Remove the merging code from ap_set_byterange() again, · 389a0fb1
  Stefan Fritsch authored Aug 25, 2011
  389a0fb1
- fix new breakage introduced by r1161767 · d52c6998
  Stefan Fritsch authored Aug 25, 2011
  d52c6998
- avoid inserting the same bucket into bbout twice, causing an endless loop · a11b1463
  Stefan Fritsch authored Aug 25, 2011
  a11b1463
- 0 is OK · 62484cb8
  Jim Jagielski authored Aug 25, 2011
  62484cb8
- no longer used · 30cbc29f
  Greg Ames authored Aug 25, 2011
  30cbc29f
- Save a few cycles... do reason to set in_merge if we already have · 8f501285
  Jim Jagielski authored Aug 25, 2011
  8f501285
- Optimize... and break if we get eg 200-100 · 8690cb10
  Jim Jagielski authored Aug 25, 2011
  8690cb10
- Merge in byteranges · 931c384a
  Jim Jagielski authored Aug 25, 2011
  931c384a
- * Once the comparsion is true we never return here since we break from the loop. · 380fbe27
  Ruediger Pluem authored Aug 25, 2011
  380fbe27
- * We need to use > instead of >= as if end64 is the first byte of the next · da4eb161
  Ruediger Pluem authored Aug 25, 2011
  da4eb161
- * The first condition is not needed as pos >=0. If the first one is true · 812d4596
  Ruediger Pluem authored Aug 25, 2011
  812d4596