Skip to content
Commit 16382e19 authored by Jim Jagielski's avatar Jim Jagielski
Browse files

Considering that under 1.3 we have not felt the need to revert

back to r-t-c, and that 1.3 is used by a *lot* more people
and so stability must be even more of a concern, I fail
to see why we need to move to a r-t-c for the 2.0 branch to
"ensure" stability or for any of the other suggested reasons.

Certainly any issues with the 1.3 release problems will themselves
be moot since the release procedure for 2.x is very different.
r-t-c, IMO, will do little more than stifle development on
a tree that really requires *more* development.

PR:
Obtained from:
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/APACHE_2_0_BRANCH@97631 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
parent 330d650f
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment