- Jan 28, 2018
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
There were a small number that inherited no BASE, the now inherit BASE_unix. Reviewed-by:
Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by:
Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5177)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Ideally, each config target should inherit a base to get their platform specific defaults. Unfortunately, that is currently not the case, so we duplicate the Unixly defaults from the BASE_unix template into the DEFAULT template. Reviewed-by:
-
Richard Levitte authored
Default values belong in the DEFAULT config target template, in Configurations/00-base-templates.conf. This isn't a complete move, but takes care of the most blatant examples. Reviewed-by:
-
Richard Levitte authored
Support the following "make variables": AR (GNU compatible) ARFLAGS (GNU Compatible) AS (GNU Compatible) ASFLAGS (GNU Compatible) CC (GNU Compatible) CFLAGS (GNU Compatible) CXX (GNU Compatible) CXXFLAGS (GNU Compatible) CPP (GNU Compatible) CPPFLAGS (GNU Compatible) CPPDEFINES List of CPP macro definitions. Alternative for -D CPPINCLUDES List of CPP inclusion directories. Alternative for -I HASHBANGPERL Perl invocation to be inserted after '#!' in public perl scripts. LDFLAGS (GNU Compatible) LDLIBS (GNU Compatible) RANLIB Program to generate library archive index RC Program to manipulate Windows resources RCFLAGS Flags for $(RC) RM (GNU Compatible) Setting one of these overrides the corresponding data from our config targets. However, flags given directly on the configuration command line are additional, and are therefore added to the flags coming from one of the variables above or the config target. Fixes #2420 Reviewed-by: -
Richard Levitte authored
C preprocessor flags get separated from C flags, which has the advantage that we don't get loads of macro definitions and inclusion directory specs when linking shared libraries, DSOs and programs. This is a step to add support for "make variables" when configuring. Reviewed-by:
-
- Jan 26, 2018
-
-
Bernd Edlinger authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Benjamin Kaduk authored
Make the sigalg name in comments reflect one that actually exists in the draft standard. Reviewed-by:
Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5174)
-
Benjamin Kaduk authored
The latest TLS 1.3 draft split the RSA-PSS signature schemes into two versions that indicate the OID of the RSA key being used. This forced us to rename the preprocessor defines for the sigalg values, and the ssl-trace code was not adopted to match, since it was not enabled int the default build. Belatedly update the ssl_sigalg_tbl in the trace code to match. Reviewed-by:
-
Benjamin Kaduk authored
The check for a duplicate value was reading one entry past where it was supposed to, getting an uninitialized value. Reviewed-by:
-
- Jan 25, 2018
-
-
Benjamin Kaduk authored
We don't need to send this extension in normal operation since we are our own X.509 library, but add some test cases that force the extension to be sent and exercise our code to process the extension. Reviewed-by:
-
Benjamin Kaduk authored
The new extension is like signature_algorithms, but only for the signature *on* the certificate we will present to the peer (the old signature_algorithms extension is still used for signatures that we *generate*, i.e., those over TLS data structures). We do not need to generate this extension, since we are the same implementation as our X.509 stack and can handle the same types of signatures, but we need to be prepared to receive it, and use the received information when selecting what certificate to present. There is a lot of interplay between signature_algorithms_cert and signature_algorithms, since both affect what certificate we can use, and thus the resulting signature algorithm used for TLS messages. So, apply signature_algorithms_cert (if present) as a filter on what certificates we can consider when choosing a certificate+sigalg pair. As part of this addition, we also remove the fallback code that let keys of type EVP_PKEY_RSA be used to generate RSA-PSS signatures -- the new rsa_pss_pss_* and rsa_pss_rsae_* signature schemes have pulled the key type into what is covered by the signature algorithm, so we should not apply this sort of compatibility workaround. Reviewed-by:
-
Benjamin Kaduk authored
These functions can now take both "sig+hash" strings and algorithm-specific identifiers like "rsa_pss_pss_sha256" that indicate a particular entry from the TLS signature algorithm registry. Also clarify that only the "_list" form allows for the new-style names (the non-"list" interfaces take sig and hasn NIDs, which cannot access all of the new-style schemes). Reviewed-by:
-
Benjamin Kaduk authored
Our historical SSL{,_CTX}_set_sigalgs() APIs take an array of NID pairs (hash and signature), and our parser for manually specifying unified sigalgs (that do not necessarily correspond to an actual signature+hash pair) was transiting via (the implementation of) this historical API. The TLS 1.3 draft-23 has introduced signature schemes that have identical signature type and hash type, differing only in the (RSA) public key OID, which prevents the rsa_pss_pss_* schemes from being properly identified and sent on the wire. To fix the issue, parse sigalg strings directly into SIGALG_LOOKUP objects, and pass around an array of uint16 wire protocol values instead of NID pairs. The old interface is retained for API compatibility but will become less and less useful with time. Reviewed-by: -
Benjamin Kaduk authored
We now have a split in the signature algorithms codepoint space for whether the certificate's key is for rsaEncryption or a PSS-specific key, which should let us get rid of some special-casing that we previously needed to try to coax rsaEncryption keys into performing PSS. (This will be done in a subsequent commit.) Send the new PSS-with-PSS-specific key first in our list, so that we prefer the new technology to the old one. We need to update the expected certificate type in one test, since the "RSA-PSS+SHA256" form now corresponds to a public key of type rsaEncryption, so we should expect the server certificate type to be just "RSA". If we want to get a server certificate type of "RSA-PSS", we need to use a new signature algorithm that cannot be represented as signature+hash, so add a test for that as well. Reviewed-by:
-
Benjamin Kaduk authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Benjamin Kaduk authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Bernd Edlinger authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Bernd Edlinger authored
Reviewed-by:
-
- Jan 24, 2018
-
-
Christian Heimes authored
The getters for min and max proto version wrongly passed NULL instead of 0 as third argument to SSL_ctrl() and SSL_CTX_ctrl(). The third argument is not used, but the error results in a compiler warning: warning: passing argument 3 of ‘SSL_CTX_ctrl’ makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] int v = SSL_CTX_get_max_proto_version(self->ctx); See https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4364 Signed-off-by:
Christian Heimes <christian@python.org> Reviewed-by:
Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Reviewed-by:
Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5128)
-
Steffan Karger authored
When using the SSL_CTX_get_min_min_version macro while compiling with -Wall, my compiler rightfully complains about this construction: warning: passing argument 3 of ‘SSL_CTX_ctrl’ makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] These macro's should use 0, instead of NULL, for the third argument, like most other SSL_CTX_ctrl 'get' wrappers do. CLA: trivial Signed-off-by:
Steffan Karger <steffan.karger@fox-it.com> Reviewed-by:
-
David Cooper authored
Reviewed-by:
-
David Cooper authored
Correct error return value in OCSP_basic_sign(). Reviewed-by:
-
David Cooper authored
Reviewed-by:
-
David Cooper authored
Make editorial changes suggested by Rich Salz and add the -rsigopt option to the man page for the ocsp command. Reviewed-by:
-
David Cooper authored
Add a -rsigopt option to the ocsp command that allows signature parameters to be provided for the signing of OCSP responses. The parameters that may be provided to -rsigopt are the same as may be provided to -sigopt in the ca, req, and x509 commands. This PR also defines a OCSP_basic_sign_ctx() function, which functions in the same way as OCSP_basic_sign(), except that it accepts a EVP_MD_CTX rather than a key and digest. The OCSP_basic_sign_ctx() function is used to implement the -rsigopt option in the ocsp command. Reviewed-by:
-
Todd Short authored
Reviewed-by:
Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
Probably this is the CCS between the first and second ClientHellos. It should be ignored. Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
Fixes #4283 Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
Fixes some bugs identified during testing. Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
This enables sending and receiving of the TLSv1.3 cookie on the server side as appropriate. Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Matt Caswell authored
This just adds the various extension functions. More changes will be required to actually use them. Reviewed-by:
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by:
-
