Lucky me, I had prepared for this :-).

identities disabled.

Don't have a constant that you're going to assign to, that's just
plain stupid (I was the stupidhead here...).

linux-x86_64 target.

Now we have directory reading capabilities for VMS as well, and all
of it in a fairly general manner.

_stricmp() on that platform, use the appropriate header file for it,
<string.h>.
o_str.h: we only want to get size_t, which is defined in <stddef.h>.

Philippe Bougeret <philippe.bougeret@freesbee.fr> notified us about Windows
not having a <strings.h>

ec_curve.c (unify comments, etc).

Submitted by: Nils Larsch
Reviewed by: Bodo Moeller, Geoff Thorpe

Add a note as to how these functions do not always return the key size, and
how one can deal with that.

PR: 907

C code yet...

module name both SHA-256 and SHA-512 are supported.

performance improvement. Make module more gcc friendly and clarify
copyright issues for division routine.

PR: 499

there's no need for a larger BUFSIZE any more...

PR: 904

PR: 904

The changes have been mailed to <crypt@bis.doc.gov> as well.

PR: 903

PR: 905

- Remove unused and unuseful debug cruft.
- Remove unnecessary 'top' fudging from BN_copy().
- Fix a potential memory leak and simplify the expansion logic in
  BN_bin2bn().

Submitted by: Nils Larsch
Reviewed by: Geoff Thorpe

comment-noise to managable levels and inverting the sense of the "uptodate"
boolean (which was counter-intuitive the way I'd left it).

prototypes, etc. Also, some fairly significant edits were made to the text
(who wrote this crap anyway? oh wait ...), removing stuff which is
overkill, rewriting stuff that was opaque, correcting things that were just
downright false, etc.

ignore.

    Yet another question: some time ago you changed BN_set_word.
    Why didn't you change BN_get_word as well?

Quite. I'm also removing the older commented-out implementations to improve
readability. This complex stuff seems to date from a time when the types
didn't match up well.

Submitted by: Nils Larsch, Geoff Thorpe

the only function that uses it) because it would trip up an assertion in
bn_div_words() when first invoked. This also adds BN_div_word() testing to
bntest.

Submitted by: Nils Larsch
Reviewed by: Geoff Thorpe

that isn't yet committed.  It wasn't meant to be committed already, so
I'm removing it for now.