- Jan 13, 2016
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
It seems like the convention for VMS exit codes is to combine the VMS C facility code (0x35a000) with a recoded exit code as follows: 0 => 1 1-255 => 8*code + 2 We also add 0x10000000, which is the control bit that has DCL not report the error on the terminal. That's just as well, since it would be quite nonsensical, for example: %C-W-NOMSG, Message number 0035A018 We could do all this by using the normal exit() function after having defined the macro _POSIX_EXIT. Unfortunately, this feature only exists in VMS C V7.1 and up. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
We missed this one because rc5 is disabled by default. Notified by The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
VMS being a record oriented operating system, it's uncertain how the 'pipe' passes binary data from one process to another. Experience shows that we get in trouble, and it's probably due to the pipe in itself being opened in text mode (variable length records). It's safer to pass data via an intermediary file instead. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
VMS uses a variant of openssl.cnf named openssl-vms.cnf. There's a Perl on VMS mystery where a open pipe will not SIGPIPE when the child process exits, which means that a loop sending "y\n" to it will never stop. Adding a counter helps fix this (set to 10, we know that none of the CA.pl commands will require more). Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Mathias Berchtold authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
-
Viktor Dukhovni authored
Well, I'm not actually changing time_t, just changing how time_t valued opt values are converted from string to time_t. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- Jan 12, 2016
-
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Create Makefile's from Makefile.in Rename Makefile.org to Makefile.in Rename Makefiles to Makefile.in Address review feedback from Viktor and Richard Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Viktor Dukhovni authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
The M_EVP_* macros related to EVP_CIPHER / EVP_CIPHER_CTX are not public, and are unused. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
They all stop including evp_locl.h, so we also take care of their adaptation to opaque EVP_CIPHER_CTX, as was promised in an earlier commit. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
We follow the method used for EVP_MD. Also, move all the internal EVP_CIPHER building macros from evp_locl.h to evp_int.h. This will benefit our builtin EVP_CIPHERs. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
EVP_CIPHER_CTX_flags was returning the flags of its associated EVP_CIPHER. However, EVP_CIPHER_CTX has flags of its own, so this function is quite confusing and therefore error prone. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Note: there's a larger number of implementations in crypto/evp/ that aren't affected because they include evp_locl.h. They will be handled in a separate commit. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
New functions: - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_encrypting() - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_iv() - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_iv_noconst() - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_original_iv() - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_buf_noconst() - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_num() - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_num() - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_cipher_data() - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_new_cipher_data() Note that the accessors / writers for iv, buf and num may go away, as those rather belong in the implementation's own structure (cipher_data) when the implementation would affect them (that would be the case when they are flagged EVP_CIPH_CUSTOM_IV or EVP_CIPH_FLAG_CUSTOM_CIPHER). Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Following the method used for EVP_MD_CTX and HMAC_CTX, EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init and EVP_CIPHER_CTX_cleanup are joined together into one function, EVP_CIPHER_CTX_reset, with EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init kept as an alias. EVP_CIPHER_CTX_cleanup fills no purpose of its own any more and is therefore removed. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Implement range-checking in all counts in apps. Turns out only a couple of cases were missing. And make the range-checking code more strict. Replace almost all opt_ulong() calls with opt_long() Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
It was assumed that the syntax FOO/Foo=PROCEDURE would create both an upper case and mixed case symbol in the GST. Not so, it requires having both FOO/Foo=PROCEDURE (to create the upper case alias) and Foo=PROCEDURE (to create the mixed case slot). We make sure that any symbol always occupies two slots (even those that don't exist) by filling up with SPARE when necessary. That will assure that any changes will still have the same symbols in the same slots no matter what (save a complete rewrite of the ordinals files). Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
It was assumed that a dummy with the type PRIVATE_PROCEDURE would simply occupy a slot but otherwise ignore the symbol. Not so, but there is SPARE for that purpose. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- Jan 11, 2016
-
-
Rich Salz authored
Fix the docs, and refactor some common code. Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Pascal Cuoq authored
Signed-off-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-