Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>

mkdef.pl was issuing the following error:

 Use of uninitialized value within %tag in numeric eq (==) at
 util/mkdef.pl line 560, <IN> line 92

This was because it was treating a __cplusplus "#ifdef" check as a "tag"
but then skipping over the corresponding "#endif". Therefore after
processing a file it still had "left over" tags from processing the
previous file. It was also getting confused by "#if" checks that didn't
match is pre-defined styles.

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

build.info needed a slight update, one more include directory.

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>

They now default to " " as separator, but that can be overridden by
having a hash with parameters as last argument.  The only currently
recognised parameter is `separator'.

The special separator `undef' will force the result to become a list
rather than a concatenated string.

Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>

The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string
in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length
of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings.

Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to
an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of
a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where
the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this
could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also
occur.

These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) >
sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second
issue dependent on compiler behaviour.

These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data
is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions
in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these
functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore
applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from
untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be
vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed
as command line arguments.

Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc
received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to
trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl.

CVE-2016-0799

Issue reported by Guido Vranken.

Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Simplifies calling code.  Also fixed up any !ptr tests that were
nearby, turning them into NULL tests.

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Ben Laurie <ben@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Ben Laurie <ben@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Fixes github issue 463.  Building the app without OPENSSL_NO_SOCK
isn't supported, so only do OPENSSL_NO_OCSP.

Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

See also the discussion in https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/455



Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

The SRP user database lookup method SRP_VBASE_get_by_user had confusing
memory management semantics; the returned pointer was sometimes newly
allocated, and sometimes owned by the callee. The calling code has no
way of distinguishing these two cases.

Specifically, SRP servers that configure a secret seed to hide valid
login information are vulnerable to a memory leak: an attacker
connecting with an invalid username can cause a memory leak of around
300 bytes per connection.

Servers that do not configure SRP, or configure SRP but do not configure
a seed are not vulnerable.

In Apache, the seed directive is known as SSLSRPUnknownUserSeed.

To mitigate the memory leak, the seed handling in SRP_VBASE_get_by_user
is now disabled even if the user has configured a seed.

Applications are advised to migrate to SRP_VBASE_get1_by_user. However,
note that OpenSSL makes no strong guarantees about the
indistinguishability of valid and invalid logins. In particular,
computations are currently not carried out in constant time.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

If the local system doesn't have GNU C or clang, and not even
makedepend, the build will stop because the call of 'makedepend'
fails.  This changes so the build won't stop because of such failure.
The result will be empty .d files, and that's ok.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Signed-off-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>

This is also RT 4137

Signed-off-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

The ssl_set_masks() function no longer depends on the cipher. This
also means there is no need to set the masks for each cipher in
ssl3_choose_cipher.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

RT#4284

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

RT#4284

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>

Different assembler versions disagree on how to interpret #-1 as
argument to vmov.i64, as 0xffffffffffffffff or 0x00000000ffffffff.
So replace it with something they can't disagree on.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

The entire contents of <internal/bn_conf.h> are unwanted in the UEFI
build because we have to do it differently there. To support building
for both 32-bit and 64-bit platforms without re-running the OpenSSL
Configure script, the EDK2 environment defines THIRTY_TWO_BIT or
SIXTY_FOUR_BIT for itself according to the target platform.

The current setup is broken, though. It checks for OPENSSL_SYS_UEFI but
before it's actually defined, since opensslconf.h hasn't yet been
included.

Let's fix that by including opensslconf.h. And also let's move the
bn_conf.h doesn't even need to *exist* in the UEFI build environment.

This is also GH PR736.

Signed-off-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>

Removing code, where memory was getting allocated for an unused variable

Signed-off-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>

Signed-off-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>

These flags are limitting needlessly, are often patched by packagers,
and should be specified on the configuration command line by anyone
who desires for it to be specific rather than forced by us.

This work was already done with mingw when those configs were worked
on, now it gets applied to the remaining configs.

Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

In the earlier change, where static libraries get built with position
independent code, OPENSSL_PIC was removed by mistake.  This adds it
back.

Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>