- Sep 09, 2019
-
-
Nicola Tuveri authored
Description ----------- Upon `EC_GROUP_new_from_ecparameters()` check if the parameters match any of the built-in curves. If that is the case, return a new `EC_GROUP_new_by_curve_name()` object instead of the explicit parameters `EC_GROUP`. This affects all users of `EC_GROUP_new_from_ecparameters()`: - direct calls to `EC_GROUP_new_from_ecparameters()` - direct calls to `EC_GROUP_new_from_ecpkparameters()` with an explicit parameters argument - ASN.1 parsing of explicit parameters keys (as it eventually ends up calling `EC_GROUP_new_from_ecpkparameters()`) A parsed explicit parameter key will still be marked with the `OPENSSL_EC_EXPLICIT_CURVE` ASN.1 flag on load, so, unless programmatically forced otherwise, if the key is eventually serialized the output will still be encoded with explicit parameters, even if internally it is treated as a named curve `EC_GROUP`. Before this change, creating any `EC_GROUP` object using `EC_GROUP_new_from_ecparameters()`, yielded an object associated with the default generic `EC_METHOD`, but this was never guaranteed in the documentation. After this commit, users of the library that intentionally want to create an `EC_GROUP` object using a specific `EC_METHOD` can still explicitly call `EC_GROUP_new(foo_method)` and then manually set the curve parameters using `EC_GROUP_set_*()`. Motivation ---------- This has obvious performance benefits for the built-in curves with specialized `EC_METHOD`s and subtle but important security benefits: - the specialized methods have better security hardening than the generic implementations - optional fields in the parameter encoding, like the `cofactor`, cannot be leveraged by an attacker to force execution of the less secure code-paths for single point scalar multiplication - in general, this leads to reducing the attack surface Check the manuscript at https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.01785 for an in depth analysis of the issues related to this commit. It should be noted that `libssl` does not allow to negotiate explicit parameters (as per RFC 8422), so it is not directly affected by the consequences of using explicit parameters that this commit fixes. On the other hand, we detected external applications and users in the wild that use explicit parameters by default (and sometimes using 0 as the cofactor value, which is technically not a valid value per the specification, but is tolerated by parsers for wider compatibility given that the field is optional). These external users of `libcrypto` are exposed to these vulnerabilities and their security will benefit from this commit. Related commits --------------- While this commit is beneficial for users using built-in curves and explicit parameters encoding for serialized keys, commit b783beeadf6b80bc431e6f3230b5d5585c87ef87 (and its equivalents for the 1.0.2, 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 stable branches) fixes the consequences of the invalid cofactor values more in general also for other curves (CVE-2019-1547). The following list covers commits in `master` that are related to the vulnerabilities presented in the manuscript motivating this commit: - d2baf88c43 [crypto/rsa] Set the constant-time flag in multi-prime RSA too - 311e903d84 [crypto/asn1] Fix multiple SCA vulnerabilities during RSA key validation. - b783beeadf [crypto/ec] for ECC parameters with NULL or zero cofactor, compute it - 724339ff44 Fix SCA vulnerability when using PVK and MSBLOB key formats Note that the PRs that contributed the listed commits also include other commits providing related testing and documentation, in addition to links to PRs and commits backporting the fixes to the 1.0.2, 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 branches. This commit includes a partial backport of https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8555 (commit 8402cd5f75f8c2f60d8bd39775b24b03dd8b3b38) for which the main author is Shane Lontis. Responsible Disclosure ---------------------- This and the other issues presented in https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.01785 were reported by Cesar Pereida García, Sohaib ul Hassan, Nicola Tuveri, Iaroslav Gridin, Alejandro Cabrera Aldaya and Billy Bob Brumley from the NISEC group at Tampere University, FINLAND. The OpenSSL Security Team evaluated the security risk for this vulnerability as low, and encouraged to propose fixes using public Pull Requests. _______________________________________________________________________________ Co-authored-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com> (Backport from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9808 ) Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9809)
-
- Sep 07, 2019
-
-
Nicola Tuveri authored
This amends the entry added in a6186f39 with the relevant CVE. Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9800)
-
Billy Brumley authored
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org> Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9781)
-
- Aug 30, 2019
-
-
Pauli authored
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9738)
-
- Aug 29, 2019
-
-
Pauli authored
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9734) (cherry picked from commit 46a9cc9451213039fd53f62733b2ccd04e853bb2)
-
- Aug 20, 2019
-
-
Pauli authored
Improve handling of low entropy at start up from /dev/urandom by waiting for a read(2) call on /dev/random to succeed. Once one such call has succeeded, a shared memory segment is created and persisted as an indicator to other processes that /dev/urandom is properly seeded. This does not fully prevent against attacks weakening the entropy source. An attacker who has control of the machine early in its boot sequence could create the shared memory segment preventing detection of low entropy conditions. However, this is no worse than the current situation. An attacker would also be capable of removing the shared memory segment and causing seeding to reoccur resulting in a denial of service attack. This is partially mitigated by keeping the shared memory alive for the duration of the process's existence. Thus, an attacker would not only need to have called call shmctl(2) with the IPC_RMID command but the system must subsequently enter a state where no instances of libcrypto exist in any process. Even one long running process will prevent this attack. The System V shared memory calls used here go back at least as far as Linux kernel 2.0. Linux kernels 4.8 and later, don't have a reliable way to detect that /dev/urandom has been properly seeded, so a failure is raised for this case (i.e. the getentropy(2) call has already failed). Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9595) [manual merge]
-
- Aug 06, 2019
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
The macro TLS_MD_MASTER_SECRET_CONST is supposed to hold the ascii string "extended master secret". On EBCDIC machines it actually contained the value "extecded master secret" Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9430) (cherry picked from commit c1a3f16f735057b45df1803d58f40e4e17b233e5)
-
- Jul 31, 2019
-
-
Antoine Cœur authored
CLA: trivial Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9295)
-
- Jul 25, 2019
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Mingw config targets assumed that resulting programs and libraries are installed in a Unix-like environment and the default installation prefix was therefore set to '/usr/local'. However, mingw programs are installed in a Windows environment, and the installation directories should therefore have Windows defaults, i.e. the same kind of defaults as the VC config targets. A difficulty is, however, that a "cross compiled" build can't figure out the system defaults from environment the same way it's done when building "natively", so we have to fall back to hard coded defaults in that case. Tests can still be performed when cross compiled on a non-Windows platform, since all tests only depend on the source and build directory, and otherwise relies on normal local paths. CVE-2019-1552 Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9400)
-
- Jul 23, 2019
-
-
Pauli authored
The rand pool support allocates maximal sized buffers -- this is typically 12288 bytes in size. These pools are allocated in secure memory which is a scarse resource. They are also allocated per DRBG of which there are up to two per thread. This change allocates 64 byte pools and grows them dynamically if required. 64 is chosen to be sufficiently large so that pools do not normally need to grow. Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9428) (cherry picked from commit a6a66e4511eec0f4ecc2943117a42b3723eb2222)
-
- Jul 24, 2019
-
-
Bernd Edlinger authored
This avoids leaking bit 0 of the private key. Backport-of: #9363 Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9435)
-
- Jun 30, 2019
-
-
Antoine Cœur authored
CLA: trivial Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9275)
-
- Jun 09, 2019
-
-
Dr. Matthias St. Pierre authored
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9118)
-
- May 28, 2019
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
- May 27, 2019
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9017)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Disabled by default Fixes #8360 Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8370) (cherry picked from commit ac4033d658e4dc210ed4552b88069b57532ba3d7)
-
- May 21, 2019
-
-
Kurt Roeckx authored
Fixes: #8737 Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> GH: #8741 (cherry picked from commit 70b0b977)
-
- Feb 26, 2019
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- Feb 20, 2019
-
-
Billy Brumley authored
This commit adds a dedicated function in `EC_METHOD` to access a modular field inversion implementation suitable for the specifics of the implemented curve, featuring SCA countermeasures. The new pointer is defined as: `int (*field_inv)(const EC_GROUP*, BIGNUM *r, const BIGNUM *a, BN_CTX*)` and computes the multiplicative inverse of `a` in the underlying field, storing the result in `r`. Three implementations are included, each including specific SCA countermeasures: - `ec_GFp_simple_field_inv()`, featuring SCA hardening through blinding. - `ec_GFp_mont_field_inv()`, featuring SCA hardening through Fermat's Little Theorem (FLT) inversion. - `ec_GF2m_simple_field_inv()`, that uses `BN_GF2m_mod_inv()` which already features SCA hardening through blinding. From a security point of view, this also helps addressing a leakage previously affecting conversions from projective to affine coordinates. This commit also adds a new error reason code (i.e., `EC_R_CANNOT_INVERT`) to improve consistency between the three implementations as all of them could fail for the same reason but through different code paths resulting in inconsistent error stack states. Co-authored-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit e0033efc30b0f00476bba8f0fa5512be5dc8a3f1) Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8262)
-
- Feb 14, 2019
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
The original 1.1.1 design was to use SSL_CB_HANDSHAKE_START and SSL_CB_HANDSHAKE_DONE to signal start/end of a post-handshake message exchange in TLSv1.3. Unfortunately experience has shown that this confuses some applications who mistake it for a TLSv1.2 renegotiation. This means that KeyUpdate messages are not handled properly. This commit removes the use of SSL_CB_HANDSHAKE_START and SSL_CB_HANDSHAKE_DONE to signal the start/end of a post-handshake message exchange. Individual post-handshake messages are still signalled in the normal way. This is a potentially breaking change if there are any applications already written that expect to see these TLSv1.3 events. However, without it, KeyUpdate is not currently usable for many applications. Fixes #8069 Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8096) (cherry picked from commit 4af5836b)
-
- Feb 02, 2019
-
-
Bernd Edlinger authored
The commit 5dc40a83c74be579575a512b30d9c1e0364e6a7b forgot to add a short description to the CHANGES file. Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8144) (cherry picked from commit b2aea0e3d9a15e30ebce8b6da213df4a3f346155)
-
- Feb 01, 2019
-
-
Michael Tuexen authored
When computing the end-point shared secret, don't take the terminating NULL character into account. Please note that this fix breaks interoperability with older versions of OpenSSL, which are not fixed. Fixes #7956 Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7957) (cherry picked from commit 09d62b33)
-
- Dec 07, 2018
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
It turns out that the strictness that was implemented in EVP_PKEY_asn1_new() (see Github openssl/openssl#6880) was badly placed for some usages, and that it's better to do this check only when the method is getting registered. Fixes #7758 Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7847) (cherry picked from commit a8600316)
-
- Nov 24, 2018
-
-
Richard Levitte authored
Also adds missing copyright boilerplate to util/mktar.sh Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7696) (cherry picked from commit b42922ea2f605fd6c42faad1743fb27be5f7f1f3)
-
- Nov 20, 2018
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7664)
-
- Oct 17, 2018
-
-
Antoine Salon authored
Replace ECDH_KDF_X9_62() with internal ecdh_KDF_X9_63() Signed-off-by: Antoine Salon <asalon@vmware.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7345) (cherry picked from commit ffd89124)
-
- Oct 16, 2018
-
-
Dr. Matthias St. Pierre authored
In pull request #4328 the seeding of the DRBG via RAND_add()/RAND_seed() was implemented by buffering the data in a random pool where it is picked up later by the rand_drbg_get_entropy() callback. This buffer was limited to the size of 4096 bytes. When a larger input was added via RAND_add() or RAND_seed() to the DRBG, the reseeding failed, but the error returned by the DRBG was ignored by the two calling functions, which both don't return an error code. As a consequence, the data provided by the application was effectively ignored. This commit fixes the problem by a more efficient implementation which does not copy the data in memory and by raising the buffer the size limit to INT32_MAX (2 gigabytes). This is less than the NIST limit of 2^35 bits but it was chosen intentionally to avoid platform dependent problems like integer sizes and/or signed/unsigned conversion. Additionally, the DRBG is now less permissive on errors: In addition to pushing a message to the openssl error stack, it enters the error state, which forces a reinstantiation on next call. Thanks go to Dr. Falko Strenzke for reporting this issue to the openssl-security mailing list. After internal discussion the issue has been categorized as not being security relevant, because the DRBG reseeds automatically and is fully functional even without additional randomness provided by the application. Fixes #7381 Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7382) (cherry picked from commit 3064b55134434a0b2850f07eff57120f35bb269a)
-
- Sep 11, 2018
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- Sep 10, 2018
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7167)
-
Paul Yang authored
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7160)
-
- Aug 21, 2018
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7019)
-
- Aug 15, 2018
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6741)
-
- Aug 14, 2018
-
-
Matt Caswell authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6949)
-
- Aug 07, 2018
-
-
Patrick Steuer authored
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6870)
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com> Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6880)
-