- Jan 12, 2016
-
-
Viktor Dukhovni authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
The M_EVP_* macros related to EVP_CIPHER / EVP_CIPHER_CTX are not public, and are unused. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
They all stop including evp_locl.h, so we also take care of their adaptation to opaque EVP_CIPHER_CTX, as was promised in an earlier commit. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
We follow the method used for EVP_MD. Also, move all the internal EVP_CIPHER building macros from evp_locl.h to evp_int.h. This will benefit our builtin EVP_CIPHERs. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
EVP_CIPHER_CTX_flags was returning the flags of its associated EVP_CIPHER. However, EVP_CIPHER_CTX has flags of its own, so this function is quite confusing and therefore error prone. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Note: there's a larger number of implementations in crypto/evp/ that aren't affected because they include evp_locl.h. They will be handled in a separate commit. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
New functions: - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_encrypting() - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_iv() - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_iv_noconst() - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_original_iv() - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_buf_noconst() - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_num() - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_num() - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_cipher_data() - EVP_CIPHER_CTX_new_cipher_data() Note that the accessors / writers for iv, buf and num may go away, as those rather belong in the implementation's own structure (cipher_data) when the implementation would affect them (that would be the case when they are flagged EVP_CIPH_CUSTOM_IV or EVP_CIPH_FLAG_CUSTOM_CIPHER). Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Following the method used for EVP_MD_CTX and HMAC_CTX, EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init and EVP_CIPHER_CTX_cleanup are joined together into one function, EVP_CIPHER_CTX_reset, with EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init kept as an alias. EVP_CIPHER_CTX_cleanup fills no purpose of its own any more and is therefore removed. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Implement range-checking in all counts in apps. Turns out only a couple of cases were missing. And make the range-checking code more strict. Replace almost all opt_ulong() calls with opt_long() Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
-
Rich Salz authored
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
It was assumed that the syntax FOO/Foo=PROCEDURE would create both an upper case and mixed case symbol in the GST. Not so, it requires having both FOO/Foo=PROCEDURE (to create the upper case alias) and Foo=PROCEDURE (to create the mixed case slot). We make sure that any symbol always occupies two slots (even those that don't exist) by filling up with SPARE when necessary. That will assure that any changes will still have the same symbols in the same slots no matter what (save a complete rewrite of the ordinals files). Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
It was assumed that a dummy with the type PRIVATE_PROCEDURE would simply occupy a slot but otherwise ignore the symbol. Not so, but there is SPARE for that purpose. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- Jan 11, 2016
-
-
Rich Salz authored
Fix the docs, and refactor some common code. Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Pascal Cuoq authored
Signed-off-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Make LHASH_OF use static inline functions. Add new lh_get_down_load and lh_set_down_load functions and their typesafe inline equivalents. Make lh_error a function instead of a macro. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Alessandro Ghedini authored
Signed-off-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Dr. Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
-
Dr. Stephen Henson authored
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
Richard Levitte authored
Since danetest is to test DANE rather than specific algorithms, it's acceptable to require EC when testing it. Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
-
Viktor Dukhovni authored
These now take and return unsigned long, and get is constified. Updated related documentation and util/ssleay.num Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-