Skip to content
  1. Sep 08, 1999
    • Dr. Stephen Henson's avatar
      This is preliminary support for an "RSA null" cipher. Unfortunately when · 4a61a64f
      Dr. Stephen Henson authored
      OpenSSL is compiled with NO_RSA, no RSA operations can be used: including
      key generation storage and display of RSA keys. Since these operations are
      not covered by the RSA patent (my understanding is it only covers encrypt,
      decrypt, sign and verify) they can be included: this is an often requested
      feature, attempts to use the patented operations return an error code.
      
      This is enabled by setting RSA_NULL. This means that if a particular application
      has its own legal US RSA implementation then it can use that instead by setting
      it as the default RSA method.
      
      Still experimental and needs some fiddling of the other libraries so they have
      some options that don't attempt to use RSA if it isn't allowed.
      4a61a64f
    • Ulf Möller's avatar
      6882a964
  2. Sep 07, 1999
  3. Sep 06, 1999
  4. Sep 05, 1999
    • Bodo Möller's avatar
      Reinitialize conf to NULL whenver ca application is started. · a32640b0
      Bodo Möller authored
      Submitted by: Lennart Bang
      a32640b0
    • Andy Polyakov's avatar
      SHA clean-up Intel assembler companion. · 69fb1c3f
      Andy Polyakov authored
      I've chosen to nest two functions in order to save about 4K. As a result
      s1-win32.asm doesn't look right (nested PROC/ENDP SEGMENT/ENDS) and it's
      probably impossible to compile. I assume I have to reconsider... But not
      today...
      69fb1c3f
    • Andy Polyakov's avatar
      SHA clean-up and (LP64) tune-up. · 7f7c318c
      Andy Polyakov authored
      "Clean-up" stands for the fact that it's using common message digest
      template ../md32_common.h and sha[1_]dgst.c are reduced down to
      '#define SHA_[01]' and then '#include "sha_locl.h"'. It stands "(LP64)"
      there because it's 64 bit platforms which benefit most from the tune-up.
      The updated code exhibits 40% performance improvement on IRIX64
      (sounds too good, huh? I probably should double check if it's not
      some cache trashing that was holding it back before), 28% - on
      Alpha Linux and 12% - Solaris 7/64.
      7f7c318c
  5. Sep 04, 1999
  6. Sep 03, 1999
  7. Sep 01, 1999
  8. Aug 28, 1999
  9. Aug 27, 1999
  10. Aug 25, 1999
  11. Aug 24, 1999
  12. Aug 23, 1999
  13. Aug 22, 1999
  14. Aug 19, 1999
  15. Aug 18, 1999
  16. Aug 17, 1999