A review of the SOL003 LCM interface demonstrates that the approach taken for documenting the methods and resources is DIFFERENT than the approach taken for the SOL002 VNF indicators interface. This is probably due to different authors writing the OpenAPIs. However, the OpenAPIs should have a common "look and feel" and should only differ in content and not in documentation style across the OpenAPIs for the various GSs. PREFERRED approach: method /resource ex: POST /subscriptions (from SOL003 VNF LCM OpenAPI) DO NOT PREFER approach in SOL002 VNF Indicator OpenAPI ex: Query multiple indicators (though reference to OpenAPI symbol GET /indicators is ok) The Description field in the SOL002 VNF indicator OpenAPI should be copied from the text describing the appropriate method for a given resource. The following text for the VNF Indicator "Get a list of indicators. Support of attribute based filtering via query parameters." is not directly copied from the GS NFV-SOL002. Best to avoid introducing new text that does not appear in the GS. Use instead "This resource represents VNF indicators. The client can use this resource to query multiple VNF indicators." Do we need to copy the attribute-based filtering text?
